DFA123 said:But what exactly could Quintana have done to prevent Froome gaining time today or in Luchon?
Miburo said:He already made many mistakes. Letting froome go on the peyresourde is a blunder. Then the next day, not even attempting one attack.
He's gonna lose at least 1 minute to froome in the ITT, personally i think it'll be even more. GL getting it back
Miburo said:Tell me, which GC contender made a serious mistake on the flat this year?
Contador crash? Porte flat? Not really a mistake.
Quintana was never forced in a bad spot, nothing happened and then now...
Zinoviev Letter said:DFA123 said:But what exactly could Quintana have done to prevent Froome gaining time today or in Luchon?
Nothing. But we are now past the Pyrenees, more than halfway through the Tour, and he is the only rider in the top 10 other than TJ Van Gaarderen not to have attempted even the smallest attack or even to have deliberately put his nose into the wind. He is not just riding more conservatively than Froome is or than usually attacking riders like Martin he is riding more conservatively than absolutely everybody.
DFA123 said:But what exactly could Quintana have done to prevent Froome gaining time today or in Luchon? I don't really see how he could prevent that. Look at Froome's form at the moment - the power he has available. Do you think Quintana had any realistic chance of dropping him on a climb as gentle as Arcalis, or attacking a big group on the Peyresourde and staying away on the descent?Zinoviev Letter said:DFA123 said:Agreed. Unless Froome can maintain this ridiculous form for three weeks, which is pretty questionable, I think this is still Quintana's race to lose. He knows that he has the ability to put time on Froome in the third week, and is even stronger this year than previous editions. If Froome does maintain this form, it's irrelevant. Quintana couldn't win whatever he tried.AlexNYC said:The thing is, racing conservatively might be his only path to victory against Froome and a super strong Sky. Obviously, he might still lose, but probably would lose by a larger margin, and without an option to win, if he did what so many fans are asking him to do.
It is not as binary a choice as that. 35 seconds of accumulated small losses to Froome's non-traditional attacks introduce a sort of ambiguity, as does the loss of a major MTF. Quintana could be the strongest in the mountains and still lose. He could drop Froome cleanly and only gain 30 seconds. And that's without taking into account possible TT losses which he would also have to make up. He could drop Froome cleanly in two stages, ride away from him twice and still end up behind. That wouldn't be inevitable, it would be a loss that his conservatism contributed to.
Miburo said:He already made many mistakes. Letting froome go on the peyresourde is a blunder. Then the next day, not even attempting one attack.
He's gonna lose at least 1 minute to froome in the ITT, personally i think it'll be even more. GL getting it back
And if that's the case, then there's also no point in critizising Quintana since Froome is currently unbeatable. Nairo will give it his best where he's expected to, in the mountains in the third week. He honestly can't beat Froome any other way so why bother?LeSensei said:Miburo said:He already made many mistakes. Letting froome go on the peyresourde is a blunder. Then the next day, not even attempting one attack.
He's gonna lose at least 1 minute to froome in the ITT, personally i think it'll be even more. GL getting it back
1 minute is being really like really optimistic.
Froome's dominance today was no coincidence - he singlehandedly catched Sagan with the wind on his face. Fabian tried to close the gap himself and had to give up. Froome is in monster form, and I think this year they might hit that 3rd week sweetspot. Movistar have been fooled, they thought this would be all over the same again as in 2015 and 2013; what they haven't realised is that moment came in Pyrenees with Froome still short of form. Now the chance is gone.
Besides Froome today reached the finish line almost euphorically sprinting against Sagan. Quintana on the other hand, back of the group and complaining later on about the stage, allegedly very tired.
+1. If Froome has really timed his peak for the third week, and he's been this strong while undercooked, then chapeau.SergeDeM said:[
And if that's the case, then there's also no point in critizising Quintana since Froome is currently unbeatable. Nairo will give it his best where he's expected to, in the mountains in the third week. He honestly can't beat Froome any other way so why bother?
Only croatia was better than portugal.saganftw said:Zinoviev Letter said:DFA123 said:But what exactly could Quintana have done to prevent Froome gaining time today or in Luchon?
Nothing. But we are now past the Pyrenees, more than halfway through the Tour, and he is the only rider in the top 10 other than TJ Van Gaarderen not to have attempted even the smallest attack or even to have deliberately put his nose into the wind. He is not just riding more conservatively than Froome is or than usually attacking riders like Martin he is riding more conservatively than absolutely everybody.
thats how portugal won the euros...nairo just needs to find i bit of Eder in him
LeSensei said:Miburo said:He already made many mistakes. Letting froome go on the peyresourde is a blunder. Then the next day, not even attempting one attack.
He's gonna lose at least 1 minute to froome in the ITT, personally i think it'll be even more. GL getting it back
1 minute is being really like really optimistic.
Froome's dominance today was no coincidence - he singlehandedly catched Sagan with the wind on his face. Fabian tried to close the gap himself and had to give up. Froome is in monster form, and I think this year they might hit that 3rd week sweetspot. Movistar have been fooled, they thought this would be all over the same again as in 2015 and 2013; what they haven't realised is that moment came in Pyrenees with Froome still short of form. Now the chance is gone.
Besides Froome today reached the finish line almost euphorically sprinting against Sagan. Quintana on the other hand, back of the group and complaining later on about the stage, allegedly very tired.
This looks like trolling but...portugal11 said:Well... merckx is right, this guy only knows how to climb. He isn't a good time trialist, he loose time in wind stages. He loose time in muritos. He barely attack when he is a couple of seconds behind the leader. He doesn't have charisma, panache. Will he ever win a tour?
SergeDeM said:This looks like trolling but...portugal11 said:Well... merckx is right, this guy only knows how to climb. He isn't a good time trialist, he loose time in wind stages. He loose time in muritos. He barely attack when he is a couple of seconds behind the leader. He doesn't have charisma, panache. Will he ever win a tour?
Not so fast. He IS a good time trialist. He's getting better all the time and he won't lose minutes. He's just proved that even without teammates he can still be at the front on a windy stage, so another false statement right there. He will attack just like he has before, but aimlessly attacking ahead of time is foolish. Charisma, panache? Those are just words for saying you subjectively like a rider or not.
Agree this is a trolling post. No need to get your panties in a bunch. Here is the reality. We are 11 stages in.portugal11 said:Well... merckx is right, this guy only knows how to climb. He isn't a good time trialist, he loose time in wind stages. He loose time in muritos. He barely attack when he is a couple of seconds behind the leader. He doesn't have charisma, panache. Will he ever win a tour?
gospina said:Everyone else is 2nd fiddle. It's Froome vs Nairo only.
Not even close.PremierAndrew said:Why do people assume that Quintana didn't leave a lot of energy on the roads today?
He knew he had to be at the front, and towards the end, he wasn't. Why? Could be down to inability to fight for position within the peloton with his physique. But much more likely that he was tired, needed a breather, and drifted further back.
Froome might have used a lot of energy with his attack, but so did Quintana most likely
portugal11 said:Well... merckx is right, this guy only knows how to climb. He isn't a good time trialist, he loose time in wind stages. He loose time in muritos. He barely attack when he is a couple of seconds behind the leader. He doesn't have charisma, panache. Will he ever win a tour?