This.Dekker_Tifosi said:Quintana aint got jack ****. Just doesn't have it and won't get it later this race either. Too bad really. Maybe just a off-year?
Now I really don't believe he did the Giro at 80% as some claim.
hrotha said:I'm shocked, SHOCKED, that Quintana is not at his absolute best after racing the Giro.
He obviously wasn't at top form at the Giro. He was getting reeled in by Reichenbach on climbs, getting dropped by 2nd tier GC contenders like Pinot and Zakarin and couldn't even put more than four minutes into a non-elite climber like Dumoulin. It looks like though instead of peaking for the Tour, he's ended up just riding both at around 90%, which is a bit of fail strategy wise. But, there was only one way to find out how it would go, and now he has found out.Tonton said:This.Dekker_Tifosi said:Quintana aint got jack ****. Just doesn't have it and won't get it later this race either. Too bad really. Maybe just a off-year?
Now I really don't believe he did the Giro at 80% as some claim.
hrotha said:I don't think it was a mistake in that sense. Like DT, I think the Giro was his actual top goal of the season. I think they wanted to avoid another loss to Froome in a straight fight and they figured Froome might be more assailable in 2018 anyways. The Friars are always willing to wait, after all, in the mistaken assumption that Quintana has all the time of the world and that a Tour victory will inevitably just happen eventually.
Exactly. If Giro was the main aim, it makes no sense to even be at the Tour. It seems much more likely that they saw what happened with the Vuelta last year and thought that Quintana could peak at a second consecutive GT - like Valverde has done in the past.hfer07 said:hrotha said:I don't think it was a mistake in that sense. Like DT, I think the Giro was his actual top goal of the season. I think they wanted to avoid another loss to Froome in a straight fight and they figured Froome might be more assailable in 2018 anyways. The Friars are always willing to wait, after all, in the mistaken assumption that Quintana has all the time of the world and that a Tour victory will inevitably just happen eventually.
If I follow your rationale, then I question why Nairo went for the double, when he could have done much better Il Giro & la Vuelta, well Knowing this Tour was the least suitable to his abilities.....
I give him credit for trying , but at this point he has to set priorities & goals above dreams.... BTW, what is Movistar/Unzue going to do about Nairo's current GC stand? are they going to fight for top 5? - That's ridiculous!!!![]()
Let's not forget he's finished 1st, 2nd and 3rd in the last three GTs. He's still comfortably the 2nd best GT rider in the world based on results.Isaak-Gabriel said:Maybe an early swan song, I guess he achieved his peak too early in his career. He's a top climber since 2013 and it seems Nairo can't go higher, a bit sad.
Spot on, but I think his full potential on climbs is done, IMHO he can't gain some % of power anymore, even in the Blockhaus I thought he could do a better time.DFA123 said:Let's not forget he's finished 1st, 2nd and 3rd in the last three GTs. He's still comfortably the 2nd best GT rider in the world based on results.Isaak-Gabriel said:Maybe an early swan song, I guess he achieved his peak too early in his career. He's a top climber since 2013 and it seems Nairo can't go higher, a bit sad.
It's certainly possible, at his age, that he's not going to improve a whole lot more.Isaak-Gabriel said:Spot on, but I think his full potential on climbs is done, IMHO he can't gain some % of power anymore, even in the Blockhaus I thought he could do a better time.DFA123 said:Let's not forget he's finished 1st, 2nd and 3rd in the last three GTs. He's still comfortably the 2nd best GT rider in the world based on results.Isaak-Gabriel said:Maybe an early swan song, I guess he achieved his peak too early in his career. He's a top climber since 2013 and it seems Nairo can't go higher, a bit sad.
Yeah I feel exactly the same.Rollthedice said:Dekker_Tifosi said:Quintana aint got jack ****. Just doesn't have it and won't get it later this race either. Too bad really. Maybe just a off-year?
Now I really don't believe he did the Giro at 80% as some claim.
He was at his best but his best is not the best.
He was still second at the Giro. That sh!t ain't easy!Dekker_Tifosi said:Yeah I feel exactly the same.Rollthedice said:Dekker_Tifosi said:Quintana aint got jack ****. Just doesn't have it and won't get it later this race either. Too bad really. Maybe just a off-year?
Now I really don't believe he did the Giro at 80% as some claim.
He was at his best but his best is not the best.
Hopefully.IndianCyclist said:this stage puts to rest the following statement 'Nairo goes better in the 2nd GT'
I agree with you Escarabajo. Anyway it's difficult to win a GT each year, cycling isn't mathematics and Nairo can't be always at his best. He's a great professional rider with lot of work ethic, sometimes we are too harsh.Escarabajo said:Isaak-Gabriel, this year is very hard to tell if he reached his peak early because of his silly Giro-Tour double idea. This year would be a bad measure.
Escarabajo said:He was still second at the Giro. That **** ain't easy!Dekker_Tifosi said:Yeah I feel exactly the same.Rollthedice said:Dekker_Tifosi said:Quintana aint got jack ****. Just doesn't have it and won't get it later this race either. Too bad really. Maybe just a off-year?
Now I really don't believe he did the Giro at 80% as some claim.
He was at his best but his best is not the best.
DFA123 said:It's certainly possible, at his age, that he's not going to improve a whole lot more.Isaak-Gabriel said:Spot on, but I think his full potential on climbs is done, IMHO he can't gain some % of power anymore, even in the Blockhaus I thought he could do a better time.DFA123 said:Let's not forget he's finished 1st, 2nd and 3rd in the last three GTs. He's still comfortably the 2nd best GT rider in the world based on results.Isaak-Gabriel said:Maybe an early swan song, I guess he achieved his peak too early in his career. He's a top climber since 2013 and it seems Nairo can't go higher, a bit sad.
The main conclusion I would draw from the last year or so, is that Quintana isn't a rider with an amazing base who can turn up and outclimb everyone at any time of year (whichkind of looked the case at times previously). To win GTs and drop everyone in the mountains enough to gain significant time, he really needs to peak and be at his best - there's too big a difference in level between his absolute best and his general season form.
hfer07 said:hrotha said:I don't think it was a mistake in that sense. Like DT, I think the Giro was his actual top goal of the season. I think they wanted to avoid another loss to Froome in a straight fight and they figured Froome might be more assailable in 2018 anyways. The Friars are always willing to wait, after all, in the mistaken assumption that Quintana has all the time of the world and that a Tour victory will inevitably just happen eventually.
If I follow your rationale, then I question why Nairo went for the double, when he could have done much better Il Giro & la Vuelta, well Knowing this Tour was the least suitable to his abilities.....
I give him credit for trying , but at this point he has to set priorities & goals above dreams.... BTW, what is Movistar/Unzue going to do about Nairo's current GC stand? are they going to fight for top 5? - That's ridiculous!!!![]()
Agree 100%, but what doesn't make sense is betting on the future when they don't know what the course will be like, vs. this Tour, with so little ITT, which on the paper is well suited for Quintana.hrotha said:I don't think it was a mistake in that sense. Like DT, I think the Giro was his actual top goal of the season. I think they wanted to avoid another loss to Froome in a straight fight and they figured Froome might be more assailable in 2018 anyways. The Friars are always willing to wait, after all, in the mistaken assumption that Quintana has all the time of the world and that a Tour victory will inevitably just happen eventually.
