I would presume he would have medical documentation that he presented to the NFL that he was one of the hyper rare individuals who could have an anaphylaxis reaction to either mRNA vaccines. If not, he's lying, still. Same with the clotting.
Next, I know someone who has a history of several allergies, and raised concern about anaphylaxis to all three vaccines here in the US. It turns out, a LOT of people are prone to anaphylaxis from
many things, but that doesn't translate directly to mRNA vaccines. So if Rodgers tries to blow smoke saying he's severely allergic to bee stings, peanuts, egg yokes, penicillin, prickly pair, and other things, that does not translate into a link to mRNA vaccines. He'd have to have a medically documented severe reaction to (straight off Moderna's website and fact sheet, Pfizer is similar, but not entirely, if someone wants to look them up): SM-102, polyethylene glycol [PEG] 2000 dimyristoyl glycerol [DMG], cholesterol, and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine [DSPC]), tromethamine, tromethamine hydrochloride, acetic acid, sodium acetate trihydrate, and sucrose.
Even then, there is debate on the issue, with some websites saying it's acceptable to receive the vaccine in a medical facility, and be closely monitored. If the person has a reaction, there is staff seconds away ready to administer epinephrine, oxygen, or other drugs, or even in the absolute rarest of situations, be taken to the ER.
How rare is it? According to the CDC, in initial studies, there were 21 cases were determined to be anaphylaxis in over 2 million injections. Put another way, less than one in a million. It may actually be lower. In phase 3 trials for Pfizer, less than 1% of people suffered a severe reaction in the entire pool, while some of those people had received a placebo. By pure numbers, that's one in two million people.
Then there's the issue of clotting. Nearly every case with the J&J vaccine of clotting was in women on birth control, of which nearly all birth control medication has a higher % of clotting than the J&J vaccine otherwise. A surprising amount of things can cause a higher level of clotting reported in the J&J vaccine. Clotting can be life threatening, but not like it was 30 years ago. The patient must be monitored, but rapid treatment works well. Even with all this, the statistics are so very low, you're far more likely to be hit by lightening, killed in a dog attack, eaten by a shark, or killed in a plane crash than get a clot from the J&J vaccine. It's insanely low.
Not only would Rodgers have lead with this, the NFL would have likely mentioned it as well. Right now, I don't buy what Rodgers says, and if he magically shows up with documents, it's going to appear a bit like a post-dated cycling TUE.
So, what do you suppose the odds are that not only does Rodgers fall into the one in two million stat with the mRNA vaccines, but also has such a severe history of clotting....
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck...
As of January 3, 2021, a total of 20,346,372 cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and 349,246 associated deaths have been reported in the United States.
www.cdc.gov
https://www.fda.gov/media/144638/do...d-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine#additional