- Aug 5, 2009
- 15,733
- 8,443
- 28,180
This goes to shows how meaningless week #1 results are. After that win, the Raiders lost 4 in a row before their "big" win against Tennessee in week #6. Then basically they lost the rest of their games. OTOH, NE experienced the opposite winning 14 games, the division & AFC championship.Let's not also forget early in the season the Raiders beat the Patriots. In New England.
49ers beat Seattle in week one but couldn't compete with them in the two late season games...........This goes to shows how meaningless week #1 results are. After that win, the Raiders lost 4 in a row before their "big" win against Tennessee in week #6. Then basically they lost the rest of their games. OTOH, NE experienced the opposite winning 14 games, the division & AFC championship.
I remember that opening win by the Raiders & thought they're off to great start & Carroll looks to be a good hire. Man, what an illusion that was. Lol.
Like to see them ditch the Thursday games permanently but they won't. Coaches hate them and players probably aren't too keen either. If they do go to 18 games, retaining the Thursday games is ridiculous. They could easily fill the gap with a few late Saturday games where the rest period between games is a better option. They could use the mid week to screen NFL related content.18 game seasons are both inevitable, and a bad idea. They would certainly need a 2nd bye week, plus to expand both the roster, and practice squads. But even then it's a bad idea, as QBs are likely to go down even more frequently than they do now. Imagine weeks, 17, 18, 20 when a winning team loses their QB, and are led into the playoffs with their version of Jarrett Stidham. Or tough guys like Josh Allen has a foot so badly broken he can't play. Plus the longer the season gets, the more likely players will sit, like they do in the NBA, where teams strategize losses, just to get to the "tournament" of the playoffs healthy. Fans will be upset if they are in a city like Arizona, looking forward to seeing someone like Lamar, or Allen come there and play for maybe the only time in their career, only to find out it's a "rest" game for that star.
I think what the NFL needs to do is plan to expand another 8 teams. Yep, eight. Four in Europe (England, Germany, Spain, France, or two in one of those countries, UK and Germany seem most popular), and four in the US (plenty of cities possible: St. Louis, San Antonio, Portland, Oklahoma City, San Diego, Salt Lake City, maybe even Toronto). AND have a second bye week. This bye week could do two things. Help teams travel to/from Europe. But also have one bye week the week before a Thursday night game. All this would take are a few billionaires to buy a franchise. And since the NFL basically prints money they are so successful, it wouldn't be a bad investment for any potential owner.
18 games is absurd. 17 games is absurd. Even when the league expanded in 1978 from 14 to 16 games, I don't think that was good, IMO.18 game seasons are both inevitable, and a bad idea. They would certainly need a 2nd bye week, plus to expand both the roster, and practice squads. But even then it's a bad idea, as QBs are likely to go down even more frequently than they do now. Imagine weeks, 17, 18, 20 when a winning team loses their QB, and are led into the playoffs with their version of Jarrett Stidham. Or tough guys like Josh Allen has a foot so badly broken he can't play. Plus the longer the season gets, the more likely players will sit, like they do in the NBA, where teams strategize losses, just to get to the "tournament" of the playoffs healthy. Fans will be upset if they are in a city like Arizona, looking forward to seeing someone like Lamar, or Allen come there and play for maybe the only time in their career, only to find out it's a "rest" game for that star.
I think what the NFL needs to do is plan to expand another 8 teams. Yep, eight. Four in Europe (England, Germany, Spain, France, or two in one of those countries, UK and Germany seem most popular), and four in the US (plenty of cities possible: St. Louis, San Antonio, Portland, Oklahoma City, San Diego, Salt Lake City, maybe even Toronto). AND have a second bye week. This bye week could do two things. Help teams travel to/from Europe. But also have one bye week the week before a Thursday night game. All this would take are a few billionaires to buy a franchise. And since the NFL basically prints money they are so successful, it wouldn't be a bad investment for any potential owner.
I could write a long post on this.
There is truth to this. Most teams are owned by good 'ol boys club of rich, white, old men. The fact that the Rooneys (and Al Davis, Mark too) hired minorities years ago, and pushed for this rule, is great and all, but it only goes so far when stuff like Philip Rivers (or Jeff Saturday) getting automatic interviews/hires. But Flores also removed himself from being considered for the Raiders HC position after just an exploratory call, for whatever the reason. If he says he knew he wouldn't get the job, he may be right. But it's pretty unlikely with the Raiders it was because of his skin color.
There are counter arguments to all this:
First, the Rooney rule is now rules, plural. They are more robust than ever before, teams must interview at least two minority coaches in person, at least once each. A video interview doesn't cut it. The rule now also applies to coordinators. So it is moving in the right direction. Flores (and others) will likely say not fast enough, or broad enough, and they may may have a valid argument, but there has been progress.
The hiring (and interviewing) of minority coaches is also cyclical. Some years better than other. The NFL will argue it's better than it was 5, 10, 20 years ago, and they would be right. But that doesn't make this year look good, and people like Flores have a right to point this year out.
Next, the article (Flores?) said "black" and that is true. But Robert Saleh was hired by the Titans. He's Lebanese-American, and a Muslim, and doesn't shy away from this or pretend to be "white". This certainly qualifies as a minority hire. Also, Mike McDaniel is biracial, and he fights against labels of any sort, won't refer to his race at all, period. But despite being somewhat pale , he also has been a known supporter of African American heritage and related causes, if quietly so. I think if he pushed it, he could have gotten a HC job, likely the Cardinals, maybe the Raiders. But he withdrew and signed on as the Chargers OC. My guess is as much as anything to take a year or two off, as he will certainly get a HC offer next year, or the year after, and likely have a choice of teams to coach.
This last point cannot be lost. I lived in Oakland years ago. I was a minority white kid living in a poor area. No one bothered me, and while I was never really racist at my core, I learned a lot there, learned to see things in a different way, and be color blind. My ex was about 1/6th black, you could kind of tell. In some pasty white racist areas, she got called things. Before her I dated a girl who was 1/2 black, and identified herself as being black. What she had to deal with, even in "progressive" areas, even what may seem simple people trying to figure out what she identified as, was at best annoying or insensitive, at worst bordering on bias and bigotry. Like McDaniel, she hated labels. I can't say, "I get it, man". Being white I won't ever truly get it. A friend of my ex, who was dark-skinned African American black once said to me, "you don't really get black culture. But you're not a racist." I took that as a compliment. As she was right.
So it's really easy for some white person (me, an NFL owner, the league of white executives) to make comments and posts like this. But we are far from any sort of arbiter, or final expert authority on this issue, and never will be.
Haven’t they also said they want games played every day of the week? That’d need Alpe’s expansion team idea, but there aren’t enough good and especially great or elite players to go around. The NFL isn’t like the quality of say baseball who has many games, high player rosters, a dedicated feeder program with the minor leagues, and the vast majority of players having a longer career. You’d just get a bunch of teams that aren’t very good and not many people will watch those games. That’s not even counting how brutal the logistics would be for teams having to go back and forth across the Atlantic.Like to see them ditch the Thursday games permanently but they won't. Coaches hate them and players probably aren't too keen either. If they do go to 18 games, retaining the Thursday games is ridiculous. They could easily fill the gap with a few late Saturday games where the rest period between games is a better option. They could use the mid week to screen NFL related content.
Yes, that's what I mean about not ditching the Thursday games, They want TV dominance. There should be two bye weeks already and why is the gap between the SB and the Conference Championship the only one with a two week gap ! Once again probably about TV. They could easily extend the season by a month and have extra byes. They seem okay with making the rosters bigger and the salary cap increasing so to me the extra rest is a no brainer. But of course they won't want to move the SB date etc...........if they don't go with a second bye just have a two week mid season break. More has to be done with scheduling. Giving teams multiple short week games consecutively before the playoffs and then having to play another short week with the first wildcard games is just poor scheduling.Haven’t they also said they want games played every day of the week? That’d need Alpe’s expansion team idea, but there aren’t enough good and especially great or elite players to go around. The NFL isn’t like the quality of say baseball who has many games, high player rosters, a dedicated feeder program with the minor leagues, and the vast majority of players having a longer career. You’d just get a bunch of teams that aren’t very good and not many people will watch those games. That’s not even counting how brutal the logistics would be for teams having to go back and forth across the Atlantic.
I still like my 19 game season with the 17, 18, and 19 being against the opposite conferences same season rank from the year before. With 3 bye weeks all at the same time for everyone and during those weeks the NFL plays highlights.
Curious...why the 9ers with a big fan base down under? Why not the Seahawks, Rams or Chargers?Had a feeling the 49ers would be the opponent as they have a big fan base in Australia
No idea ! maybe because of the Jarryd Hayne hysteria in 2015 at least with the newer fans but with the older fans not so much. Hayne was a star in Rugby League so when he went to the NFL it was big news in Australia but he didn't even last two seasonsCurious...why the 9ers with a big fan base down under? Why not the Seahawks, Rams or Chargers?
dailysnark.com
The king of WR offensive penalties. I remember he had two in one game against the 49ers and Pete Carroll was giving him the death stare............![]()
Lions Fan Involved In Altercation With D.K. Metcalf Files A $100 Million Lawsuit
The Detroit Lions fans who was involved in an alteration with D.K. Metcalif during a December game as filed a $100 million defamation lawsuit against the wide receiver, the Steelers, former NFL wide receiver Chad Johnson and several companies, The Detroit Metro Times reports. He is also suing...dailysnark.com
Like I said before, if I was the fan I would have fell forward over the barrier.
Even the highlights made me sleepy.........NFC won, is all I rememberWTH? Justin Fields turns down a Pro Bowl invite? Lol
![]()
Jets QB Justin Fields reportedly declines Pro Bowl slot, cites offseason training
Fields cited offseason training as the reason he would not be participatingwww.cbssports.com
And no talk about the Pro Bowl tonight? Game is going to be played indoors at the prestigious Moscone Center. It's sure to be a barn burner with Sanders playing. Lol
Here's an interesting article on that. The NFL is eyeing some private companies that, in conjunction with NASA, are designing "boomless" supersonic commercial jets. Currently, NY to London takes a little over 7 hrs. The Concord back in it's day made it in about 3 hrs.With all this travel, if they keep going overseas the NFL is going to need to bring back the Concorde, or wait a few years until new supersonic jets are viable.
Here's the thing though, Darnold isn't exactly a statue, and extends plays within the pocket very well, and while Maye can be a dual threat for sure, plenty of the time he's beat defenses with his arm. But I also think as I said before, the Patriots are going to have to utilize Maye's ability to run as part of their gameplan, which will at least force Seattle to spy him on most plays, making it a bit more challenging on Seattle's DBs, if Maye can effectively run. They stop this, the Pats will have a hard time sustaining drives, and scoring.This will will be the first SB involving a pure pocket passer vs dual-threat since SB LV where you had Mahomes vs Brady (and Brady came out on top in that matchup).
Maybe he extends plays within the pocket but he presents absolutely no running threat whatsoever. Only 95 yds rushing this year? Only 9 yds on 3 carries in the playoffs? And just a little over 1000 yds rushing in his entire career? Aren't those Peyton Manning type numbers? LolHere's the thing though, Darnold isn't exactly a statue, and extends plays within the pocket very well, and while Maye can be a dual threat for sure, plenty of the time he's beat defenses with his arm. But I also think as I said before, the Patriots are going to have to utilize Maye's ability to run as part of their gameplan, which will at least force Seattle to spy him on most plays, making it a bit more challenging on Seattle's DBs, if Maye can effectively run. They stop this, the Pats will have a hard time sustaining drives, and scoring.
