- Apr 20, 2009
- 45
- 0
- 0
jbeyer said:Maybe I am the odd one of the lot, but I REALLY despise the new design.
Ditto, BIG thumbs down. It was perfect before.
jbeyer said:Maybe I am the odd one of the lot, but I REALLY despise the new design.
Right on!!!Rouleur said:Cyclingnews editorial guys, I think you have not understood the main selling point of your site. Simple to use with the information at your finger tips and easy to read and navigate. Just like Wikipedia, you had a simple uncluttered layout and were easy to use, that's why it worked.
JOCKEYWILSON said:I assume you've adopted the bike radar format? That is not a good thing. The old site was great in so far as you could read all the news on one page. You did not have to navigate about.
The simplicity of the old site was it's beauty. People seem to confuse complex functionality and multiple menus with design flair. Think about the design classics of the modern era they are classics because of their simplicity.
I'm afraid it's far from being a triumph.
Rouleur said:Cyclingnews editorial guys, I think you have not understood the main selling point of your site. Simple to use with the information at your finger tips and easy to read and navigate. Just like Wikipedia, you had a simple uncluttered layout and were easy to use, that's why it worked.
Thoughtforfood said:People hate change. I will get used to the changes. So will almost everyone else.
turtle13 said:Do not want!
I do not want to see spoilers for race info. I have always liked being able to see the live report, stage details (where did they go?) and other information about races without seeing results, just in case I want to see TV/video first.
ElChingon said:I hope to see this thread referenced in the "Whats hot on the Forum" blurb![]()