New site design

Page 38 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jun 22, 2009
7
0
0
fergnago said:
No the new site is Adrian Karsten


or david duffield... talks the talk and promised so much, but ultimately misses the breaks and key moves... again and again... so that you're screaming at the telly! "duffers - NO - get it right!". he rarely did.
 
Mar 16, 2009
19
0
8,530
Please remove spoilers

I've come to the conclusion that the only way to appeal to the 'wise' owners and runners of this site and their determination to spoil the enjoyment of the coverage of our sport, is to appeal to the advertisers.

All this frustration cannot be going un-noticed, surely they can't find the site any better.

1. drop each one an email asking them to stop advertising on a website that is spoiling our sport.

2. Never click an advert on this site - SO Visit each adverter by googling them.

P.S. Can some one point me to all the archived site content, with the results of past races, photos and race reports.

cheers
 
May 5, 2009
296
0
0
Andy.G said:
I REALLY miss the old 'open up the gallery' of the photos of the day ... these thumbs are waaaaaay too small....
I LOVE CYCLINGNEWS.COM - I go NOWHERE ELSE.
... just kill the spoilers for the TdF ... pleeeeeease.

I agree. By the way, does anybody know how to set up a Poll in the Forum?...
 
Jun 22, 2009
82
0
0
Archive results

Right, talk to the ad people privately, that should do it, but that would have to be done by a large number of the old faithful to get results. The CEO won't budge until Rome burns, at least I am pretty sure about that. Once he gives in, the rest will follow right in line. They all follow the company line to keep their jobs.

On the archive, its here...
http://autobus.cyclingnews.com/archiveindex.php?id=archives

BBR
 
Mar 29, 2009
27
0
0
ninjaslim said:
I've come to the conclusion that the only way to appeal to the 'wise' owners and runners of this site and their determination to spoil the enjoyment of the coverage of our sport, is to appeal to the advertisers.

All this frustration cannot be going un-noticed, surely they can't find the site any better.

1. drop each one an email asking them to stop advertising on a website that is spoiling our sport.

2. Never click an advert on this site - SO Visit each adverter by googling them.

P.S. Can some one point me to all the archived site content, with the results of past races, photos and race reports.

cheers

Does anyone have some quick links to the contact addresses for the advertisers? Maybe a compiling a quick list would help get things started.
 
Jun 17, 2009
63
0
0
advertisers

awesometown said:
Does anyone have some quick links to the contact addresses for the advertisers? Maybe a compiling a quick list would help get things started.

There was a list. I used it, but I think the post was removed (censored). I am sure off the forum there is plenty of information to be had, you just have to work out people email address etc.

The posts today are good today, I feel we are loosing steam, I guess 35 - 40,000 must be the core readership? That's good to know. I haven't counted, but I think iit is about 900 to 5 (five people like the new site????)
 
Jun 16, 2009
18
0
0
awesometown said:
Does anyone have some quick links to the contact addresses for the advertisers? Maybe a compiling a quick list would help get things started.

I compiled a list and posted it, but it was deleted by the editors so I don't want to put it up again. However, it only took me a short time to get the information. All of the advertisers have websites and in most cases there is a "Contact Us" or "About Us" link somewhere on the page. Just Google the company or their product to get to their homepage.

I should also reiterate that I was not specifically trying to bash Cyclingnews. I think the advertisers should hear from us whether we like or dislike the redesign.
 
awesometown said:
Does anyone have some quick links to the contact addresses for the advertisers? Maybe a compiling a quick list would help get things started.

Well, let's just start.

----------------------- cut here --------------------

To expand this list, copy and paste what is here now, and add the contact email address (or appropriate web form http address) for any additional cyclingnews.com advertisers.

* Fizik http://www.fizik.com/info_contact.aspx
* Wiggle wiggle.co.uk sales@wiggle.co.uk
* Speedplay http://www.speedplay.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.contact
* Vittoria http://vittoria.com/index.php?option=com_performs&Itemid=143
* BMC (U.S.A.) http://www.bmc-racing.com/en/us/home/contact/
* BMC (U.K.) http://www.bmc-racing.com/en/uk/home/contact/
* Moots info@moots.com

It takes a few minutes to identify sponsors and look up the contact info - there is no point in everyone doing that. So please take a few minutes and add some more to this list, and copy/paste the entire list into a reply to this message.

When writing to the sponsor, it probably wouldn't hurt to mention that you understand the need to fix the back end here so that information is retained in a database rather than millions of html files, but the issues we have are with the new front end (spoilers, usability, stage 1 = stage 9, etc.)
----------------------- cut here --------------------

Sorry, cyclingnews, but your sponsors really need to understand how disappointed your regular visitors are, and how it will affect the bottom line for everyone.
 
Jun 17, 2009
63
0
0
Advertisers list

sfgrandprix said:
I compiled a list and posted it, but it was deleted by the editors so I don't want to put it up again. However, it only took me a short time to get the information. All of the advertisers have websites and in most cases there is a "Contact Us" or "About Us" link somewhere on the page. Just Google the company or their product to get to their homepage.

I should also reiterate that I was not specifically trying to bash Cyclingnews. I think the advertisers should hear from us whether we like or dislike the redesign.

I used your list, thank you before it was deleted. I also was very kind to cyclingnews, this was a friend after all. I do think advertisers do need to read this forum. They can make up their own minds. My problems may not be other peoples problems. I only came on a forum because I was so dissapointed, I did not set out to trash cyclingnews. I think various staffers did that for themselves and now have been told not to return email, with is the best really as they did not have any trainning in how to respond to so many negative posting. I am nearly washed up with this and will soon stop posting. What will be will be. I know I gave it my best shot, and it was to save a friend of at least 10 years. I don't think I will ever return to cyclingnews, I will find somewhere else, it might not be the same....it could be better, but I feel we have seen the last of simple websites that set out to help users not hinder the navigation. Final shot. If the stupid flash stuff at the top go. Spoilers go. two columns come back and the content returns to pre 15th June and is easy to find...then I will take a look. Spoilers was not a problem to me...but now it is, because it was forced on me...and I do not like it.
 
Mar 11, 2009
664
1
0
:D I like the tags that are listed at the bottom of this thread.

"death of a legend, new site design, sucks balls, terrible"
 
Jun 16, 2009
18
0
0
pedrospeeps said:
I used your list, thank you before it was deleted. I also was very kind to cyclingnews, this was a friend after all. I do think advertisers do need to read this forum. They can make up their own minds. My problems may not be other peoples problems. I only came on a forum because I was so dissapointed, I did not set out to trash cyclingnews. I think various staffers did that for themselves and now have been told not to return email, with is the best really as they did not have any trainning in how to respond to so many negative posting. I am nearly washed up with this and will soon stop posting. What will be will be. I know I gave it my best shot, and it was to save a friend of at least 10 years. I don't think I will ever return to cyclingnews, I will find somewhere else, it might not be the same....it could be better, but I feel we have seen the last of simple websites that set out to help users not hinder the navigation. Final shot. If the stupid flash stuff at the top go. Spoilers go. two columns come back and the content returns to pre 15th June and is easy to find...then I will take a look. Spoilers was not a problem to me...but now it is, because it was forced on me...and I do not like it.

I totally agree, and I think your posts have been some of the best, not abusive or petty in any way. In fact there have been quite a few comments from very intelligent and thoughtful people who are not angry or spiteful but instead are genuinely concerned. Many of them seem to have extensive professional experience in web design and are taking time out of their busy schedules to provide honest advice without any compensation.

The response, unfortunately, has been simply abysmal. Greg is working on the bug fixes and we all appreciate that, he and Susan seem to be aware of the situation and I get the sense they are as frustrated as the rest of us. Stefan and especially Daniel, sorry to say, have come across as incompetent jerks.

Does anyone know whatever happened to Gerard Knapp? When he sold the company to Future Publishing, he wrote that he would be staying on. Is he still there? I can't imagine he would be a party to this disaster.
 
Mar 3, 2009
377
0
0
All,

We should be rolling out another lot of fixes to bugs later today, so I hope to be updating you on that this evening. For now, here's some answers to a few more questions.

I can assure you we're reading all of your feedback and while we're not able to respond to everything it is being taken onboard. To that end, please keep the feedback coming. If you've experienced any issues that haven't already been mentioned, please let us know either via the forum or an e-mail to redesign@cyclingnews.com.

maxlite said:
For example all results whether they were road/mtb/track/cross came up in order of event date in ONE list now you have to click on specific cat.... you just miss things.

The homepage will be the same as the old one - with events from all disciplines on it.


mikere said:
What happened to race maps and profiles?????

These features will return once we have the bugs preventing them from being posted ironed out.

Bala Verde said:
Hi Greg,

I was wondering (again, don't know if someone posted it already) if the "tech layout" is going to resemble the old design a little more. The problem is, that if I want to see an overview of all the 'reviewed pro bikes' in a season, let's say all of the ones in 2009, I have no idea how I can find them in one neat list.

I now see a 'pro bike feautures' list, containing 5 of the latest reviews, but how do I get an overview of all of them done in 2009?

(It could be that I haven't figured out how to navigate there... but then, enlighten me :D

PRO BIKES and INDEXING OLD SITE

PRO BIKES NEW SITE

cheers

PS> it would be a nice addition to have the 'titles' of the specs in bold. Instead of seeing (Cancellara's TT bike)

Front tyre: Veloflex tubular

Front tyre: Veloflex tubular

There's currently no archiving system on the tech default page at all. It was one of the post-launch tasks, which is still on the agenda but pushed down the line a little as we've prioritised other things mentioned in the reader feedback we've received. But yes, there will be more of a system behind it.

As for your PS, since I handle CN's tech content you've caught the right person - will ensure this is done.
 
Jun 23, 2009
1
0
0
Sucks on Iphone

The new site is really terrible. I usually viewed Cycling news on my iphone, but now it is so slow and congested. My finger usually hits the wrong story and I have to wait for it to load so I can bail out and try agin. You need to make the headlines bigger and easier to select, along with fixing all the other stuff people are complaining about.
You guys took a giant step backward. The old site was SO much better
 
Jun 23, 2009
3
0
0
I think the new design rocks.

The old site's nav was rubbish. Now all the disciplines have equal billing.

I do MTB, road, track and TT, and I like to follow all of them. In the new site its much easier to find the content.

I am a webmonkey myself, and the main problem with changing anything is that people will bleat because they liked the old way. Even tho it was rubbish.

I was about to give up on CN it was gettign so bad to look at.

Well done guys. Its a great start.
Are you using a CMS or something that has been custom built from the ground up?
 
Jun 23, 2009
168
0
0
I am new to the forum. I have read cyclingnews almost every day for as long as I can remeber. The old website had achieved something very rare - extremely simple navigation and exceptional content. I could log onto the site and leave with a good idea about what was going on. Everything was easy to find and was always well written.

The new site has taken my favourite thing on the internet and destroyed it. I am close to just not bothering anymore. There is way too much clutter and I have no idea what is new. I find I leave the site with little memory of what I was reading as I have filtered out everything as it is so busy. I sincerely hope you listen to your readers and move back towards the old format.

The new forum is interesting, though, and currently is the only reason I am coming back to the site.
 
Jun 19, 2009
1
0
0
new website

Hello, pardon me if this is a little convoluted but it is my first time on this forum. I have checked out Cyclingnews.com for many years and just loved the content and format. I especially loved the maps of stages with the accompanying stage profiles but since the website format change I don't seem to be able to find the profiles. If anyone can help me I would sure appreciate it as it really identified the stages with the high cols, and therefore the stages that I liked most of all.
Incidentally, I am going to France this September to the area just east of Grenoble specifically to climb Galibier, Telegraphe, Croix de Fer, l'Alpe d'Huez and even a little more south and west to Mt. Ventoux.
 
Mar 11, 2009
74
0
0
Personally I think the new design is fine. Sure it took a bit of getting used to, i.e. how to find what you want quickly, ease of navigation etc., but that happens (with me anyway) with any site that has been redesigned. Now after a week or so of daily surfing of the site I think that it is a definite improvement (not that the previous design was bad). Well done.
 
May 9, 2009
5
0
0
Bad design, end of

Look at the feedback and tell me I'm wrong. Yeah you're going to get people moaning with any change, but that shouldn't blinker you to that fact that a new design can be a mistake.

You seem hate your users with passion. You wanna use that passion for good instead, you could make a fortune.

BTW Ad Block Plus + Flashblock make the experience of coming onto the site ever so slightly less zingy and unpleasant to look at.

Andy
 
Jun 16, 2009
13
0
0
Results

Greg Johnson said:
All,

We should be rolling out another lot of fixes to bugs later today, so I hope to be updating you on that this evening. For now, here's some answers to a few more questions.

I can assure you we're reading all of your feedback and while we're not able to respond to everything it is being taken onboard. To that end, please keep the feedback coming. If you've experienced any issues that haven't already been mentioned, please let us know either via the forum or an e-mail to redesign@cyclingnews.com.



The homepage will be the same as the old one - with events from all disciplines on it.




These features will return once we have the bugs preventing them from being posted ironed out.



There's currently no archiving system on the tech default page at all. It was one of the post-launch tasks, which is still on the agenda but pushed down the line a little as we've prioritised other things mentioned in the reader feedback we've received. But yes, there will be more of a system behind it.

As for your PS, since I handle CN's tech content you've caught the right person - will ensure this is done.


Thanks for that Greg, will be good to have events from all disciplines on home page
 
Jun 23, 2009
128
0
0
The things I'm missing

Where are the full results???? I am not only interested who made the top ten.
Not everything new is better.

:confused: :confused: :confused:
 
meisenberg@biggear.com said:
The new site is really terrible. I usually viewed Cycling news on my iphone, but now it is so slow and congested. My finger usually hits the wrong story and I have to wait for it to load so I can bail out and try agin. You need to make the headlines bigger and easier to select, along with fixing all the other stuff people are complaining about.
You guys took a giant step backward. The old site was SO much better

That reminds me. I loved being able to load the complete live report onto my iPhone during the Giro, and read it at my leisure, even without maintaining a live connection (like on an airplane). That's a really critical feature!

The bigger point is that plain html works great with all browsers. And, no, needing a change on the back end is not an excuse to have to have flash and anything other than basic html on the front end.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.