That was a bit hilarious for the Russians. Bolshunov has this won though bar any injuries or covid, but fight for 2nd and 3rd could be decent with Cologna, Manificat and the Russians. De Fabiani was miles off today so he's out of it
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Well the snow isn't the problem. The medium mountain ranges get enough of it. Places Like Oberhof have great infrastrucure Folie artificial snow and so. And let's Not forget that You can have all The snow in Winter You want, 8-9 month of The time You have to traon Off snow anyway. The oroblem is that only a fraction of the population lives in these areas that have a winter sport tradition. 95 percent plus of the Population lives in areas with no Wintersport tradition and hardly any snow. And the population in the mountain areas is decreasing, so you get less kids.I know, and I wasn’t expecting them to have meters of snow, but at least respectable amounts. There’s possibilities in Schonach (Schwarzwald), areas around Freiburg, Oberwiesenthal and Oberhof in the East, Garmisch, Traunstein, Oberammergau, Oberstdorf, etc in Bavaria...I know that most of those areas aren’t as high as, but there’s plenty of opportunities. I think there are more than one or two issues facing German winter sports.
Given how well he skied in the classic race today Momo could end up fighting for a podium spot, he's always great on the Alpe Cermis ascent. The same could be said about Spitsov, who could be the 2nd Russian on the final podium.
I have to say that the route is crap and that the Fis/Norge mafia did everything they could to help Klaebo. Bonus seconds only in the sprint and in the one distance race that really suits him (Val di Fiemme mass start classic).
IT is a shame. Every race these dasys is either a sprint or a 10/15km Race. So boring. FIS thinks short races are the way for xc skiing to stay attractive and compete with a Biathlon. A horrible approach IMO .Yeah this is another route that was geared towards Klæbo. I miss the days of a prologue, a skiathlon, a 20 km classic mass start (they even had a 30km mass start only 5 years ago), the Cortina to Dobbiaco/Toblach was fascinating as well...FIS has really messed up the traditional routes and it’s really monotone and stale right now, two sprints and all the distance races are 15km except for the final stage. They had a great opportunity to change the route last year as it wasn’t championship season but it’s obvious they don’t care about that. They want loops, short races and skate sprints.
And why those 10/15km mass starts at he TdS when neither of them actually gets used at the Wc or the Olympics?IT is a shame. Every race these dasys is either a sprint or a 10/15km Race. So boring. FIS thinks short races are the way for xc skiing to stay attractive and compete with a Biathlon. A horrible approach IMO .
IT is a shame. Every race these dasys is either a sprint or a 10/15km Race. So boring. FIS thinks short races are the way for xc skiing to stay attractive and compete with a Biathlon. A horrible approach IMO .
Yea but the problem is it becomes self-perpetuating. So long as the calendar is so heavily weighted towards sprinting, why would you ever focus on becoming a strong distance athlete? And as long as the budget disparity is allowed to continue unchecked, then of course nations outside of those with the huge budget advantages are going to look at the disciplines where there are more variables, whether that be gravitating towards a different sport entirely, like biathlon where the disadvantage in ski speed can be countered with shooting, or focusing on sprint events which have a greater element of luck determining the outcome, whether that be because of demolition derby courses like Gatineau being greenlit or because a wrecking ball on skis like Mattias Strandvall ends up wiping out a major contender in the first heat, whereas in the distance events, especially when they're conservatively raced, the big guns can always come back from misfortune.In one way I can understand the annoyance but at the same time, the sprints are probably the most competitive races they have , especially without the Norwegians. Its the same guys of course but it greatly increases the nations who can compete. Across both genders, you have strong potential winners from Sweden, Norway, Russia, Switzerland, Slovenia, US, France, Italy in the sprint races, and there's more countries who can get into the top 6. We don't really have that in the longer distance ones where it's pretty much just the first 3 countries who'll share the wins between them.
It doesn't help when you have the de facto international broadcast led by a complete imbecile who has neither patience to allow a race to develop, nor can remember what happened five minutes ago or understand what he sees on a timing screen in an individual start, so insists incessantly that the way to improve the sport (and he maintains this argument in NoCo and biathlon too) is to have more short head to head events so he doesn't have to think too hard.
And yet, what are the mass starts that we remember most vividly in recent years? You'll find a lot more people recall Johan Olsson disappearing with 40km left to go in Holmenkollen or Hans Christer Holund's win in Seefeld fondly or vividly than Alex Harvey in Lahti or Northug in Falun.I had exactly the same discussion with the commentator 20 minutes ago.
But...are really mass start events more interesting for the viewers? Especially the new and neutral ones? What a mass start XC event is giving us? 10 years ago it was basically Lineker paraphrasing "80 people are skiing for 2 hours and Northug wins at the end" Yeah, sure. If I see that sort of race twice in a row I will be massively inspired to watch once again for more than 5 minutes.
He defended that the theory of "fun mass starts" by saying that we have to remember that it was not always Northug winning and we had like 30 people in the line.
Then I asked whether he finds sprint stages in cycling with 150 people attacking the line or the mountain ones with people finishing on their own (it's not like we often see that, but however). Still waiting for his reply.
I agree that XC compared to biathlon is a bit limited, but I do agree and think that lack of variety is slowly killing the sport. IIRC Norway tour from last year was a really great race and the key for developing the sport is stage races with many different formats inside. Like the first editions of Tour De Ski
And yet, what are the mass starts that we remember most vividly in recent years? You'll find a lot more people recall Johan Olsson disappearing with 40km left to go in Holmenkollen or Hans Christer Holund's win in Seefeld fondly or vividly than Alex Harvey in Lahti or Northug in Falun.
I agree there needs to be more variety, and the thing is there's plenty of scope for it in skiing. It's just that they think that an even balance of sprints and this nebulous concept of "distance" which applies to anything not in sprint format is a good balance.
If they want to do a time trial event on a weekday to set up a pursuit in the other technique on a weekend in place of the old skiathlon, then I'm down with that too. Biathlon has by and large decided that a way to retain the old formats is to hold those on weekdays to give the more crowd pleasing relays and head to head races (pursuit, mass start) the best TV time, maybe XC should be doing that? A 15/10 individual start on Friday, then the 15/10 pursuit on the Saturday in the opposite technique from the Friday race and then something else on Sunday would be a good idea for a weekend that could vary things. The mini-tours seem to work with a sprint, a time trial and a pursuit. Or you could mix it up and have a sprint on Friday, a genuinely long mass start race on Saturday (say a 30/20) and then a time trial over a shorter distance (10/5?) to finish the weekend on the Sunday to put some suspense into the individual start format and attract some fans to follow it.
After all, the FIS have repeatedly defended the use of the mass start over individual start by saying the German audience doesn't understand individual start. Not only have they now alienated the German audiences and the country become peripheral to the sport anyway, but the Germans of course go nuts for biathlon, which has more individual start events than XC and in fact the only format that appears at every event is in individual start!
And if you are in conversation with Patrick Winterton and he is defending the repetitious Mass Starts, it might be worth reminding him that last season at the Lillehammer relays, he was actively telling us all that it was a good thing that there was heavy snow at the start because it would mean a close race... then he spent 3/4 of the race complaining that nothing was happening and suggesting we shake up the relay format by making it shorter to give sprinters more chance because it was boring. Why was it boring? Because the heavy snow was meaning nobody could get away and it was no different to a mass start race where everybody stays together as a group.
Eurosport International so using the English commentary feeds. I had a silent commentary-less feed for the women's 10k though, which was an infinite improvement. I can just imagine what Winterton will have been like for a 1-2 by his beloved Americans and a win for his favourite women's skier (at least now Kikkan Randall has retired). Usually he's telling us how it's such a brilliant thing for the sport to have the Americans prominent, punctuated by Mike Dixon occasionally interjecting a "come on, Jess!" when she's attacking the great Norwegian machine. It's done more to incite me against Diggins than anything she herself has done or has any control over, to the point where I almost feel sorry for the fact I want just about anybody to beat her. They're hideously biased in favour of the US team in both sports they cover, and are huge fans of Northug and Klæbo so believe that sprints and mass start races are the recipe for excitement because it is most likely to result in the conclusion they like. Dixon is at least a bit more of a traditionalist, and defends individual races, classic technique and, in biathlon, the Individual because he feels it important to uphold some traditions of the sport, for which Winterton usually mocks him and criticises him for "never embracing change" or "standing against fun" because he likes the relay format as it is rather than Winterton's preferred 1x 5k, 1x 3k, 1x 2k, 1x 1k format "because that still gives something for the endurance skiers while letting the sprinters have their fun".Regarding commentators, is Patrick Winterton English version UK commentator? If so, I tend not to watch wintersports on English Eurosport as many of them are horrible. Even the ski-jumping one. Same goes to cycling, where I find them boring for majority of the race/stage,
Eurosport International so using the English commentary feeds. I had a silent commentary-less feed for the women's 10k though, which was an infinite improvement. I can just imagine what Winterton will have been like for a 1-2 by his beloved Americans and a win for his favourite women's skier (at least now Kikkan Randall has retired). Usually he's telling us how it's such a brilliant thing for the sport to have the Americans prominent, punctuated by Mike Dixon occasionally interjecting a "come on, Jess!" when she's attacking the great Norwegian machine. It's done more to incite me against Diggins than anything she herself has done or has any control over, to the point where I almost feel sorry for the fact I want just about anybody to beat her. They're hideously biased in favour of the US team in both sports they cover, and are huge fans of Northug and Klæbo so believe that sprints and mass start races are the recipe for excitement because it is most likely to result in the conclusion they like. Dixon is at least a bit more of a traditionalist, and defends individual races, classic technique and, in biathlon, the Individual because he feels it important to uphold some traditions of the sport, for which Winterton usually mocks him and criticises him for "never embracing change" or "standing against fun" because he likes the relay format as it is rather than Winterton's preferred 1x 5k, 1x 3k, 1x 2k, 1x 1k format "because that still gives something for the endurance skiers while letting the sprinters have their fun".
David Goldstrom on the ski jumping is less biased, but a lot more clueless.