Interesting lineup for the Finnish women, Kyllönen, Matintalo, Niskanen and Pärmäkoski. They really don’t have strong distance skate skiers, apart from Niskanen and Pärmäkoski, and those two are better in classic. There hope is that they won’t lose too much in the first half and then they’ll try to make up whatever deficit they have.
The Russians have Stupak, Nepryaeva, Sorina, and Stepanova. The same lineup that won in Lillehammer in December. I am wondering if having Rygalina instead of Sorina would have been a better pick, because she was 8th in the skiathlon and had the third fastest time in the skate part. Perhaps they think that 5km is a bit too short for her. Having a youngster as your anchor in the Olympics could be seen as risky as well, but Stepanova has shown strong resolve and is tactically very astute for someone with her youth and inexperience. I am also wondering what the weather will do in the second half of the Olympics. If it continues to get warmer, it could be tricky conditions. Though I suppose it would be worse if it snowed, because wax technicians have said that’s the most difficult part of the area, if new snow comes in it totally changes the complexion of the snow, even when it clears out and it’s sunny. Also interested in seeing how Nepryaeva has recovered from that tough result yesterday. Hopefully it only motivates her to give everything tomorrow and get herself a second medal at these Olympics.
Sweden going with Dahlqvist, Andersson, Karlsson, and Sundling. That is the logical quarter, and while I first thought why Karlsson as the skate skier and not Andersson, I think now that because Andersson had a better race yesterday and finished more than 30 seconds ahead of Karlsson. Karlsson looked dead at the finish yesterday. She was on the snow for a while. Can she recover physically and mentally? Sundling as the finisher makes sense, she’s the best sprinter in the world at the moment, and it seemed like she could have gone another heat or two in the sprint race. I don’t think lasting the 5km will be too difficult, although you never know at altitude and that sort of snow and toughness of the course. Perhaps Ribom as the first leg skier instead of Dahlqvist was a better option, but Dahlqvist is still in decent form.
There’s the Norwegians with their quartet. They are obviously hoping that Weng doesn’t lose too much time and that Johaug has a strong leg. Putting Haga in fourth may seem strange, but without Heidi Weng and Kalvå, they really didn’t have too many choices. They are hoping that she’s given a lead and can maintain it, but apart from Johaug, the Norwegian women are just not skiing well at the moment. They could be out of the medals completely. That said, any team could be out of the medals if they miss the wax or someone loses a big chunk of time. On that altitude and those courses, it can happen.
The Germans I expect to challenge for a medal as well. They have two strong classic skiers, Sauerbrey and Hennig, Carl is a solid skier, and then Krehl, who is their weakest skier in that quarter, but again, if all 4 can put down a good performance they definitely have shot at the medals.
The last team with a chance are the Americans. They’re just hoping that Swirbul doesn’t lose a lot of time on the opening leg. If she loses 30 seconds or more, than that will be very hard. They perhaps should have put Diggins in third to maybe ensure a high position before the last leg and hope that McCabe can hang on, but it’s still a decent team with a chance.