You are imho one of the more knowledgeable posters on this thread so I say this with all due respect, but it seems like a massive stretch to say Klaebo would have 'smoked' a skier who many consider the greatest of all time based on what he did at Trondheim? The competition was frankly very thin there; 4 other Norwegians plus Chanavat in the sprint final, he won the skiathlon by only .7 over Andrew Musgrave, a fine skier but hardly a Dario Cologna, and in classic individual start was just 21 seconds ahead of noted Norwegian skiing legend Henrik Doennestad in 3rd. Those were excellent performances by him but those fields were very weak sauce. Just my .02 of course but I'm not seeing that.
In the sprint races there is no doubt in my mind that Klæbo is on a complete different level than Northug and that peak Klæbo should beat peak Northug close to 9 out of 10 times. The difference between them in sprint quality are massive, Klæbo has about the same number of sprint races NOT won in 7 seasons as Northug actually won.
In the skiathlon, the distance going from 30 kilometer to 20 kilometer nowadays should be a benefit for Klæbo versus peak Northug. By that I mean his sprint after 20 km is probably slighlty better than hus sprint after 30 km (or 50 km), while for Northug it didnt seem to matter how long the race was. Northug never set the pace and dropped people in mass start races, so there is no reason to believe he would’ve upped the pace in the Trondheim race (and the pace was high, as seen when only 4 guys remained in the end) and it would’ve comed down to the last kilometer. On a 20k race in the form Klæbo showed, Im sure he would beat Northug in that sprint. Yes, he only beat Musgrave with 0.7 but I think it’s meaningless to look at time gaps in a finish like this. Klæbo decided it over the last hill top and didnt have to properly sprint to the finish line. With Northug it would be a sprint between them and Im sure Klæbo would’ve won a high speed sprint as the one in Trondheim.
The 10 km would also be close of course, Northug had a couple of outstanding interval start races. Again I think the shorter distance would benefit Klæbo and that he would edge Northug in a short classic race.
It’s a bit puffy to say that Klæbo wouldve “smoked” Northug, but Northugs strongest quality was that he was faster than his opponents, and if he would’ve faced a faster guy his strengths that won him all the gold medals would’ve only given him silver. And Klæbo is faster.
Compring Northug and Klæbo I think Northug deserves to be given a clear edge on 50 km races and on individual skating races. Northugs maybe biggest legacy is the relay last legs with 5 WC relays in a row. I dont think Northug ever would drop Klabo in a 10k skate and that Klabo as the faster guy wouldve beaten him atleast 4 out of those 5 times if they had started together.
Northug has 8 titles and I think Klæbo couldve won some of those races if he was there racing Northug.
- The sprint in Falun no doubt.
- The 50 km in Vancouver I’m also pretty sure Klæbo couldve won. The course wasn’t that hard, the pace was not impressive and it was a massive group in the end.
-The 50 km in Falun also, the snow made it impossible to make it a very hard race.
-The 50 km in Liberec was also a slow race with a big pack, Klæbo has never done a 50 k like this but it should’ve been possible to survive.
-The 30 and 50 k in Holmenkollen could be a possibility too. It wasn’t raced that hard and the Norwegians had superior skis, especially in the 50k.
-The 15 km in Val di Fiemme is the one Klæbo definitively wouldn’t have replicated.
If you put Northug in the Championship races of 2018-2023:
Peyonchang:
- 30k: could’ve survived, but Krueger won with a tactical solo that would’ve also hindered Northug
- 15k: Cologna was amazing this day, i think not.
- 50k: no chance, Niskanen and Bolshunov was outstanding
Seefeld:
- 30k: Northug could’ve survived, but he never faced a pace and such a reduced group early in any of his championship races.
- 15k: maybe
- 50k: no chance to compete with Holund in such a race.
Oberstdorf:
-30k: He could've survived. but once again a early selection we never saw in Northug era.
- 15k: no chance, course was hard and Holund outstanding
- 50k: he could be there
Beijing:
No chance in any of those races in those courses and with the slow snow.
Planica:
30k: no chance against Krueger in my opinion.
15k: with a Val di Fiemme race he would be close.
50k: here he shouldve had a good chance.
In general my feeling is that the mass start races have been much faster and much more selective since 2018 (from cirka 2012 to 2017 it got more and more normal with selective racing in mass starts). Mostly because of Bolshunov (and Niskanen in classic part of skithlons and classic mass start races) and some outstanding performances by Holund and Krueger.