- Apr 7, 2011
- 4,886
- 439
- 16,580
please eat your own dish and don't forget to share with the other norwegian loserskanari said:Who cares? As long as Sweden have 0 gold medals everything is fine here...
python said:please eat your own dish and don't forget to share with the other norwegian losers
kalla phenomenal !
I wouldn't say it's over-confident to expect gold in the relay when we have won every (!) relay since 2009, mostly with a huge gap.python said:i am sure that the norwegians will analyse what happened rationally and will be back on the top.
but when i was reading the norwegian pre-olympic media with all the medal counts and the over-confident hype, i will admit, i wished for a lesson, for a more cool-headed assessment characteristic of nordic people.
let's see if another lesson will be delivered tomorrow. something tells me, it may
Bavarianrider said:I've gotta say Nystads performance is what suprises me most today. Only 9 seconds slower as Kalla
Bavarianrider said:Let's not forget Niskanen. She had a similar performance to Kalla.
Herman and Lahetmaki were not that fast.
It won't be that warm tomorrow. Some 3 degrees cooler. Should help the norwegian waxers.
python said:not only it will be cooler, but the loops are relatively easier than anything they've raced on so far. so, the norwegian men imo are almost certain to have a better showing than their ladies today...
but my point is different. i acknowledge that their skis weren't the best today. but we now have witnessed something like 3-4 races in a row (including the biathlon) were the explanation was simplistically the same - bad skis. i have followed the complex sport for too long buy it as the ONLY reason.
i did follow the weather... though predominantly warm, it has varied from day to day. some courses were melted by sun, some were more shady...plus, having one expert waxing team fail so consistently from day to day while other teams seamed to have found the solution - is again too simple. if so simple, it could only be explained by the incompetence or a sabotage. neither apply.
we should not exclude mistakes with peaking, altitude timing and perhaps something else that i can not mention here.
Well..It is probably more complex than that. But you only have to go back to 2011 where Sweden failed their waxing throughout most of the championship to find something similar.python said:not only it will be cooler, but the loops are relatively easier than anything they've raced on so far. so, the norwegian men imo are almost certain to have a better showing than their ladies today...
but my point is different. i acknowledge that their skis weren't the best today. but we now have witnessed something like 3-4 races in a row (including the biathlon) were the explanation was simplistically the same - bad skis. i have followed the complex sport for too long buy it as the ONLY reason.
i did follow the weather... though predominantly warm, it has varied from day to day. some courses were melted by sun, some were more shady...plus, having one expert waxing team fail so consistently from day to day while other teams seamed to have found the solution - is again too simple. if so simple, it could only be explained by the incompetence or a sabotage. neither apply.
we should not exclude mistakes with peaking, altitude timing and perhaps something else that i can not mention here.
but you still explain everything with the ski prep, which i clearly don't buy.MrRoboto said:Well..It is probably more complex than that. But you only have to go back to 2011 where Sweden failed their waxing throughout most of the championship to find something similar.
Norway didn't have the best skis in the beginning of the 2010 olympics either, but they got better after a few races.
No, I said that you don't have to go far back to see a top notch waxing team consistently fail throughout a championship. I didn't explain anything but comment what you said.python said:but you still explain everything with the ski prep, which i clearly don't buy.
Sure it wasn't 10?Bavarianrider said:So Norway has spent 5 million Euros on a programm called "Best Skies in Sochi"
i said a lot more than just about waxing. you chose to comment ONLY on waxing...MrRoboto said:I didn't explain anything but comment what you said.
Sure it wasn't 10?
Through the whole of that last leg I was thinking Denise was going to ride Lahteenmäki's coat-tails all the way to the finish and try and make as short a period decisive as possible to play to her strengths. I think that however Kalla's being so strong caused Denise to go to the front earlier than she would have liked, and as a result she didn't have enough left in the final sprint. A shame for them to only get bronze, but you'd say that 1) Kalla deserved that gold medal, she was absolutely sensational today; 2) Saarinen and Niskanen having made so much of the race with their legs, the Finns are more than good enough value for silver, and 3) if you'd offered the four of them bronze this morning, they'd have taken it without a second thought.Bavarianrider said:Let's not forget Niskanen. She had a similar performance to Kalla.
Herman and Lahetmaki were not that fast.
It won't be that warm tomorrow. Some 3 degrees cooler. Should help the norwegian waxers.
Definitely there's more than just waxing in it, form not being perfect definitely has to be taken into account, plus we must also consider the psychological effect on the squad that Astrid Jacobsen's bereavement will have had.python said:i said a lot more than just about waxing. you chose to comment ONLY on waxing...
sure it is absolutely fine to comment on what you feel, but again, imo, it is too simplistic NOT seeing the superform of others (like cologna, kalla...) and the relative lack of form (like northug, roenning...)
 
		
		 
		
		 
		
		
 
				
		