http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/nygaard-breaking-traditions-with-luxembourg-presentation
Two things bother me about his statements in the article.
First off calling Canc and BOTH Schlecks for "legends". Fabian I'm cool with, but I'd defintely sayd there's quite a bit to go yet for the Schlecks to be worthy of the "legend" title - like winning a couple of GTs for example and maybe riding with a bit more consistency?
Second bit that annoys me is the "when I was introduced to Becca in May 2010". Wasn't one of the loyalty problems on Saxo that riders and personal where being approached already in late 2009? And doesn't it sound weird that one of the last people to be recruited would be the man to run the whole thing?
Maybe I'm wrong?
Two things bother me about his statements in the article.
First off calling Canc and BOTH Schlecks for "legends". Fabian I'm cool with, but I'd defintely sayd there's quite a bit to go yet for the Schlecks to be worthy of the "legend" title - like winning a couple of GTs for example and maybe riding with a bit more consistency?
Second bit that annoys me is the "when I was introduced to Becca in May 2010". Wasn't one of the loyalty problems on Saxo that riders and personal where being approached already in late 2009? And doesn't it sound weird that one of the last people to be recruited would be the man to run the whole thing?
Maybe I'm wrong?