- Aug 13, 2009
- 12,855
- 1
- 0
Jean-Luc Picard said:That's NOT what I'm calling for. We know he broke the doping codes. He accepts that. But there is a hell of a lot more to discuss. It would be a post guilty debate, a kinda TRC. But it would also touch of the hot topics that both parties still hotly dispute, like the evidence over continued doping on the comeback, and the nature of how the USADA offered deals. It would probably largely be about if the sport has changed. I think it would be healthy since there is STILL a lot of lingering issues out there that periodically return. Still feels unresolved.
Anyway, I hope both sides would not chicken out if they really are confident.
There is no debate, no hot dispute. Only lance trying to spin his way out of it.
All the riders who told the truth have said the same thing, they were not offered a deal until after they testified. Lance was given the same chance to come in a tell the truth.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/150499171/USADA-invite-to-Lance-Armstrong
He told them to Fork off.
The experts agree that Lance doped in his comeback.
Despite Lance's lying and smearing of USADA they are still open to talking to him.....but he is too chicken to do it