The breadth, the depth, the corruptive influence, the moral turpitude, the criminality, and the sheer professionalism of the Pharmstrong doping ring is an order of magnitude grander than anything else ever uncovered. Nothing else comes close.
One would imagine certain characteristics are common to all doping programs, such as the cheating (the PEDs themselves), the lying (cover-ups), the (international) drug smuggling, and maybe even the money laundering (even on those points, Pharmstrong's was perpetrated with far more élan than the rest). But how many others were involved in extorting the complicity of the unwilling? Orchestrating the personal destruction of those unwilling to comply (or daring to j'accuse)? Witness intimidation/tampering? Bribery and/or extortion of sporting officials?
How many were so bold as to defraud a government agency for tens of millions of dollars with the full intention of violating the terms of the agreement under which the monies were paid?
How many others have traded on their stature as a "legitimate" sporting hero to set themselves up as the figurehead for a worldwide charitable movement and then siphoned off hundreds of millions of donated dollars to purposes only at best tangentially related to the cause?
I don't give a fig about the doping or the lying. Competitive cyclists were caught doping all the way back to the 1860s, so the doping is SSDD. And one would presume they've been lying about it every bit as long as they've been doping. What I find so morally reprehensible is the damage Pharmstrong caused to the sport's integrity, and how he spurned the opportunity to get it started healing.
One would imagine certain characteristics are common to all doping programs, such as the cheating (the PEDs themselves), the lying (cover-ups), the (international) drug smuggling, and maybe even the money laundering (even on those points, Pharmstrong's was perpetrated with far more élan than the rest). But how many others were involved in extorting the complicity of the unwilling? Orchestrating the personal destruction of those unwilling to comply (or daring to j'accuse)? Witness intimidation/tampering? Bribery and/or extortion of sporting officials?
How many were so bold as to defraud a government agency for tens of millions of dollars with the full intention of violating the terms of the agreement under which the monies were paid?
How many others have traded on their stature as a "legitimate" sporting hero to set themselves up as the figurehead for a worldwide charitable movement and then siphoned off hundreds of millions of donated dollars to purposes only at best tangentially related to the cause?
I don't give a fig about the doping or the lying. Competitive cyclists were caught doping all the way back to the 1860s, so the doping is SSDD. And one would presume they've been lying about it every bit as long as they've been doping. What I find so morally reprehensible is the damage Pharmstrong caused to the sport's integrity, and how he spurned the opportunity to get it started healing.