86TDFWinner said:
As for Roll, do you think he knew from the jump that Wonderboy was doping?
TexPat said:
Bob Roll was simply another mouthpiece for the swindle. He can get stuffed.
Hey kids, let's step back into the Time Machine again!
Back in 2011, Sports Illustrated had just released their long-awaited, much-anticipated, exposé about the underbelly of the Armstrong myth.
(Damn, looking back at that thread now, the trolling was off the hook, and no one was quite sure just when, or if, the truth about Armstrong would ever be fully exposed. Only three years ago. My-oh-my, how things have changed.)
Also back then, the Versus sports network use to have their own web presence (before getting gobbled up by NBC). As luck would have it, Bob Roll posted his own, personal, rebuttal to the SI piece, in a short video. Despicable, really. He knew, better than most,
exactly what had fueled Lance to all those "victories." The guy should've been run out of the sport a long time ago for his complicity in selling the myth.
The Versus site is no longer there, and I couldn't find the clip online (after only the very briefest of searches). But that's OK!
Back when it came out, someone was kind enough to transcribe it for us.
As I posted the other day about CVV—the internet really does suck for some of these jokers.
Enjoy.
Granville57 said:
Enough of this idiocy.
Is Bobke so truly pathetic that he thinks we are all complete and total morons?
I transcribed Bob Roll's ridiculous response to the SI article so that we can be clear about what he said and parse those words if need be. No wonder very few people want to speak openly about doping when this kind of myth-reinforcement is what they have to contend with. Congratulations, Bob. I hope you get subpoenaed too. Try telling your fairy tales to the Grand Jury.
Here it is, verbatim:
“Well, in recent weeks, the rumor mill has been grinding away...and it was said that Sports Illustrated had a huge exposé on the career of Lance Armstrong, most specifically the recent allegations—I guess they’re about a year-old by now—of Floyd Landis.
“And I found the expectations to be riding high that this uh, article by Sports Illustrated was going to be a huge,
new set of revelations. Unfortunately, very disappointingly, Sports Illustrated didn’t have
any new information, and they have rehashed all of the testimony, and all of the statements we’ve heard before, from all of the principal players.
“Nothing new under the sun, and I think that Sports Illustrated might have confused the Yellow Jersey for “yellow journalism.” A horrible story.
“I’m not sure if the authors were payed by the word but they should spread the wealth around because they didn’t use their words, they used the words of people we’ve already heard from. And uh…nothing new on that front. Very disappointing that Sports Illustrated would uh, try to sell some papers because of this. Another round of accusations that Lance Armstrong and the U.S. Postal and Discovery teams…it doesn’t seem as if there’s anything new under the sun there.
“We’ll have to wait and see what uh, Jeff Novitsky and the “FDA” can come up with. But so far, after a <chuckle>
long,
researched and
rumored article, nothing from <chuckle> Sports Illustrated. They need to go back to the drawing board and uh, look for some facts that maybe we could talk about.”
Alpe d'Huez said:
That Bobke vid was pretty pathetic. I'm not going to waste the bandwidth commenting anymore on it. He must take us all for fools.
D-Queued said:
He obviously takes himself for a fool.