- Mar 10, 2009
- 7,268
- 1
- 0
sometriguy said:Yeah, 2nd best time... wow he sucks bad
relatively he does. He was 18s ahead of Wiggins at check 1. Check 2 he is only 7s ahead.
sometriguy said:Yeah, 2nd best time... wow he sucks bad
he fadded like 6 seconds over 10km, that is nothing.... lance lost like 30... get a lifeissoisso said:Did you not read, or did you not comprehend?
Fading means he's not doing nearly as well as he was. In the first 18kms he gained 20 seconds. In the next seven kms he lost 22.
El Imbatido said:See how P & P described that "kloden was loosing valuable seconds" as Wiggo's time ticked by but for lance they just brushed it off as if it didnt matter.
sometriguy said:he fadded like 6 seconds over 10km, that is nothing.... lance lost like 30... get a life
LinkAge said:andy lost only 5 sec to LA after 28.5 km..
strange...
yeah, iam the troll.... and there it is, contador fading!!!! LMFAOissoisso said:So you're attacking me because you don't like what's happening. That's mature
Also, your figures are wrong.
You're going on my "irrational trolls to ignore" list.
Publicus said:Contador is crushing this thing.
clydesdale said:To be fair, he was 33 back after check two and climbed faster than Lance. Not a shocker.
seldon71 said:Klödi ok, not great - not bad. Still he loses to Moreau who also had rain in descent.
issoisso said:He's going to lose time on the wet descent, but so will everyone else that matters on GC, so the stage is going very well for him.
max_powers said:Contador could use an electric shift button on that rig, several of them, like one for the drops when standing. Get to work Sram
Don't say thing like that he may put you on his "irrational trolls to ignore" list"Publicus said:So far you are batting a 1.000 on your Contador predictions.![]()
what happens if the battery fails on electronic dura ace... i don't trust itEl Imbatido said:Conta will most likely be on a diff team next year and they might not use sram![]()
Publicus said:So far you are batting a 1.000 on your Contador predictions.![]()