It's a bit silly that he thinks he can't ride the Tour as a preparation, when you see how well that worked for MVDP last year.Yes.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
It's a bit silly that he thinks he can't ride the Tour as a preparation, when you see how well that worked for MVDP last year.Yes.
Yes, but VLAB maybe don't want to waste a TdF space for WVA.It's a bit silly that he thinks he can't ride the Tour as a preparation, when you see how well that worked for MVDP last year.
Here we go again; Van Aert signaling he's Belgian number 1. It'll end up like Leuven and Ala takes a surprise gold for France.In short, he doesn't want to ride the Tour to prepare for the OG.
For some browsers, there is a handy add-on that translates text you selected in a pop-up on any website, into the language of your choice. So you don't have to copy/paste it into another translation website.
Even though Vanthourenhout is a big WVA fan, he won't make that mistake again. Don't believe he'll make WVA the sole leaderHere we go again; Van Aert signaling he's Belgian number 1. It'll end up like Leuven and Ala takes a surprise gold for France.
Not to diss his recovery but my wife's unusually low heart rate max and natural power provides weird numbers like this. Good to see him doing it now!Wva doing 220w at what is some people's resting heart rate.
Exactly my point. In fact I'd be very, very disappointed if he doesn't race if Vingegaard doesnt. I completely understand him not wanting to bury himself again and be *** on for having goals himself along the way as well, but now that Jonas may be out of the picture and Wout not able to ride in Italy, it makes no sense for me to skip TdF.Can't imagine him not riding the tour now. Especially if Vingegaard's not going. That means he probably woun't have to domistique anything and can pick a few days to go for stages and use the rest to prepare for OG.
Indeed, we don’t want you skipping the TdFExactly my point. In fact I'd be very, very disappointed if he doesn't race if Vingegaard doesnt. I completely understand him not wanting to bury himself again and be *** on for having goals himself along the way as well, but now that Jonas may be out of the picture and Wout not able to ride in Italy, it makes no sense for me to skip TdF.
(as Mod)
I am frequently challenged to act on trolling in these pages, and that is always going to be a judgement as to what the poster's intention is. So is there any defence that is going to be offered for the "Belgian Pozzato" line by this stage? It was original, and therefore possibly funny, at one time: Is anyone going to claim that, by now it is anything other than an attempt to wind up his fanbase, and therefore trolling?
Even if not deemed funny, I don't think that's sufficient to reduce the moniker to only being a(n intended) wind-up. In short, it calls for the lowering of his status. As long as he is treated as one of the Big Six while not winning any big races, I think that's a fair point. In addition, it has also been used to describe (and blame him for) his racing style.(as Mod)
I am frequently challenged to act on trolling in these pages, and that is always going to be a judgement as to what the poster's intention is. So is there any defence that is going to be offered for the "Belgian Pozzato" line by this stage? It was original, and therefore possibly funny, at one time: Is anyone going to claim that, by now it is anything other than an attempt to wind up his fanbase, and therefore trolling?
It's kinda cruel but still relevant as his palmares has not changed nor lived up to the Big Six tag.(as Mod)
I am frequently challenged to act on trolling in these pages, and that is always going to be a judgement as to what the poster's intention is. So is there any defence that is going to be offered for the "Belgian Pozzato" line by this stage? It was original, and therefore possibly funny, at one time: Is anyone going to claim that, by now it is anything other than an attempt to wind up his fanbase, and therefore trolling?
I very much agree that nicknames shouldn’t be banned and would create a slippery slope and inconsistency. If the conversation turns brutal then maybe intervene but I’ve never even really seen that issue with nicknames.
I have never used that as a nickname for Valverde.Rick was quite quick in stopping Netserk's cute 'Cancer' nickname for Valverde before it started spreading (or metastasising) to other users.
I have never used that as a nickname for Valverde.
No. A comparison is not a nickname, a description is not a nickname. A nickname is a substitute for the proper name of a specific object.That's just a plain lie.