He is getting better race after race. He can win PR.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I do think he has lost his explosive kick and sprint. Time to loose some weight after Roubaix to get gc Wout at the Giro?He looked, at one time, like he was going backwards (Paterberg, Koppenberg, Taaienberg combo).
But he just didn't weaken while others got weaker in the end.
I don't see him ever win RVV, he is just getting too sluggish on the climbs. But he still has that formidable powerful motor, and when well-trained, well-fed and well-rested, he shouldn't worry about the final hour of monuments. He's made for 260K but not those explosive uphill cobbles (anymore). I hope he gets a win at Roubaix, at least once in his career.
Rode well and seemed to get better and better in relative level through the race. Just don’t think it suits him in the Pogacar era as in the Boonen Cancellara era of super hard riding for position between the climbs but lesser pace uphill he would have thrived far more.IMO, WVA can be proud of himself; he surprised me, at least, today, he rode smart too. I want WVA or Pedersen to win Roubaix. I wouldn’t mind it at all.
WVA deserves to go out with a bang and definitely deserves to have a cobble monument on his resume to reflect his strength throughout his career.
Absolutely agree—WVA rode very smart, didnt ride out of his comfort zone to many times and stayed to his limit and gambled like he should, it paid of at the end for him, which indeed is a promising sign.Rode well and seemed to get better and better in relative level through the race. Just don’t think it suits him in the Pogacar era as in the Boonen Cancellara era of super hard riding for position between the climbs but lesser pace uphill he would have thrived far more.
Good signs that he can be a massive threat next Sunday and has got ascendant firm rather than slipping away at the biggest time as in seasons past where he was flying in E3/GW only to fade in RVV/PR.
I was really disappointed by that attitude of van der poel.and the fact that Van der Poel just cares more about Van Aert losing than winning himself.
I would respectfully say that this could be seen the other way around.I was really disappointed by that attitude of van der poel.
To achieve the best result he could.Wout did all of the work to the lead in and MVP disrespected him at the line. low class move to me for what?
If you're Wout and you're smart and you see Mathieu racing that way you should attack him, because that means he's ***. Otherwise van der Poel rarely shies away from taking a turn. In fact, the race thread is full of criticism of him for stupidly doing too much work.if that were true, these guys wouldn't take turns pulling when all of us know they don't have to, to improve their positions ahead of chases. There are peloton dynamics at play. Let's say he loses pogi's wheel, sits in behind wout to finish because everyone can see he's wasted. And finishes on that wheel. Then the post race comments about being sick and crashed and such makes a little more sense. If I'm wout, I think a little differently about him.
Making arguments without ad hominem attacks is much more effectiveIf you're Wout and you're smart and you see Mathieu racing that way you should attack him, because that means he's **cked. Otherwise van der Poel rarely shies away from taking a turn. In fact, the race thread is full of criticism of him for stupidly doing too much work.
This sounds like all the whining from American gravel racers whenever someone gets a good result from using tactics instead of riding everyone off their wheel.
It's the same discussion I've heard a hundred times in a different context. I found it relevant.Making arguments without ad hominem attacks is much more effective