Actually Merckx, I would have worded your last statement a little different. I prefer:
"So even after Novitzky delivers the goods, SCA could be an independent path to another forced doping confession" <-- bonus. ...just saying
In my opinion Novitzky will prove to the GJ that miracle boy used peds, therefore:
1: USADA will be obligated to open a case against him - and on a side note prevent la from racing triathlons and mountain bikes .. ***
2: From what Hog states, perjury is not pursued after a civil case. Hog has already pointed out other laws he may have breached in SCA trial
http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?p=401806#post401806
3: This one has had me thinking for ages. Now ASO is a company(IE shareholders involved!), their aim any financial year is maximum profit. Therefore, is ASO obligated to take action to recoup what is theirs? *** or is that a can of worms they don't want to open?
Therefore: Is ASO, like a vulture, waiting to sue him? I presume an entity can sue from another country! cheers
*** let me know if I am getting carried away!