Race neutralised for a few moments because of hail.
Cyclingnews forum response:
Cyclingnews forum response:

Whenever a rider is seriously injured or dies in a crash, we get posts stating we need to do more about safety. Yet when commissars are proactive in neutralising a race for safety reasons people complain. You can't have it both ways.
not hail, melting snow apparently.Race neutralised for a few moments because of hail.
Cyclingnews forum response:
![]()
You won't find me being hypocritical about this stuff. Some people are all about safety all the time, others not so. There'll always be someone complaining.Whenever a rider is seriously injured or dies in a crash, we get posts stating we need to do more about safety. Yet when commissars are proactive in neutralising a race for safety reasons people complain. You can't have it both ways.
I have never whined for "need to do more about safety"Whenever a rider is seriously injured or dies in a crash, we get posts stating we need to do more about safety. Yet when commissars are proactive in neutralising a race for safety reasons people complain. You can't have it both ways.
it never works out anyway. They just get going whenever they want.Everyone should start together, and then be released according to the gaps before the neutralisation.
Care to explain what you're objecting to and why, rather than expecting me to read your mind?Also....dude come on
But what safety reasons are there today?
And it's not the same people who complain in both cases, so you can't say it like that.
Because you're blaming the riders, and that's very easy to do from your keyboard warrior battle position.Care to explain what you're objecting to and why, rather than expecting me to read your mind?