For sure, quite the race it's turned out to be. Also, so much for all the "this will be a boring season with Contador at the helm".
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Merckx said:Thats true, I hadn't really noticed that. Their squad has been noticeably weak at P-N.
Dekker_Tifosi said:He is the same age as Contador, 26. And, he is not a climber, in a sense that, on the real steep climbs, he breaks down. Luckily for him, this Paris Nice is a perfect fit for him, with most climbs not average above 5%. Perfect for his style.
LL Sanchez has great difficulty with steep climbs and real high mountains (2000m). He will never become a great rider for general classifications in the biggest races, but races like Paris Nice, are just perfect.
Dekker_Tifosi said:He is the same age as Contador, 26. And, he is not a climber, in a sense that, on the real steep climbs, he breaks down. Luckily for him, this Paris Nice is a perfect fit for him, with most climbs not average above 5%. Perfect for his style.
LL Sanchez has great difficulty with steep climbs and real high mountains (2000m). He will never become a great rider for general classifications in the biggest races, but races like Paris Nice, are just perfect.
I think it is the Pro-Tour / drive for internationalism in cycling that has messed things up. The Tour of California is great for Californians, and great for people who want to sell bicycles, but give me Paris-Nice any day. Why not just race in Europe?ATBScott said:So - I sent a letter in to the staff at cyclingnews.com, and Greg informed me of the new forum, and I thought I would post the same here and see what people thought: Basically what I wrote in the letter:
I'm looking forward to following Paris-Nice starting this weekend. I was perusing the start list on Cyclingnews.com, and it seems to me that, while still committing quality riders to the event, that Paris-Nice does not have the "firepower" as far as team strength and "big name" riders that was lined up in California for the Amgen Tour of California. True, there are still some awfully big guns at this race - some of them competed in California and names like Contador, Schleck, Flecha or Quick Step's Chavanel can't be dismissed, but overall I was surprised that this big event did not seem to have the depth of talent that I have seen in year's past. Is this because of injuries, Paris-Nice not being as prestigious as in previous years, or is there some other political positioning on the team's part? Perhaps a little retribution to the organizers of some French events for their willingness to operate outside the Protour rules?
It'd be interesting to hear thoughts!
MrCoppi said:I think it is the Pro-Tour that has messed things up. The Tour of California is great for Californians, and great for people who want to sell bicycles, but it would never be as hotly contested were it not for the pro-tour status. Give me Paris-Nice any day.