Paris-Nice

Page 6 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jun 26, 2009
171
0
0
Here are the riders of Team Astana to be present in France for the race Paris-Nice :

* Alberto CONTADOR (SPA)
* Dimitri FOFONOV (KAZ)
* Maxim GOUROV (KAZ)
* Daniel NAVARRO (SPA)
* Benjamin NOVAL (SPA)
* Gorazd STANGELJ (SLO)
* Oscar PEREIRO (SPA)
* Andriy GRIVKO (UKR)

Astana Cycling Team
Communication Department
 
Jun 22, 2009
10,644
2
0
theyoungest said:
What's with all this Gesink talk in a thread about a race in which he doesn't even compete?

BTW, Rabo for Paris-Nice:
Bauke Mollema
Lars Boom
Dennis van Winden
Jos van Emden
Rick Flens
Tom Leezer
Bram Tankink
Joost Posthuma

That's right, a completely Dutch squad. Average age: 25.

Really think mollema could ride well here. Little time trialing, he should make the top ten here.
 
Mar 17, 2009
11,341
1
22,485
KazakhNeRider said:
Astana roster: it seems that "flat stage team" is stronger than "mountain team", De la Fuente is out...

I hope Martinelli knows what he's doing. Who is taking DDLF's place? Grivko?
 
Mar 17, 2009
11,341
1
22,485
ImmaculateKadence said:
Yeah why isn't DDLF going? Did I miss something? I'm good at that.

I honestly don't know. He did leave Algarve early because of a knee injury but beyond that all we have at the moment is Khazakhnerider's comments about a flat stage team vs mountain team (which doesn't make any sense looking at the route, but maybe that's just me). Grivko isn't very big and I know there was early talk about him riding the Tour so maybe AC and Martinelli want to see how things workout. All a mystery at the moment.
 
Feb 14, 2010
2,202
1
0
Publicus said:
I honestly don't know. He did leave Algarve early because of a knee injury but beyond that all we have at the moment is Khazakhnerider's comments about a flat stage team vs mountain team (which doesn't make any sense looking at the route, but maybe that's just me). Grivko isn't very big and I know there was early talk about him riding the Tour so maybe AC and Martinelli want to see how things workout. All a mystery at the moment.
Specialized has it:

"We changed out two riders in the last days," Martinelli continued. "Jesús Hernández and David De LA Fuente are unable to start, so we brought in Andriy Grivko and Gorazd Stangelj. Hernández is really ready to race, but he has a small knee problem that he is working on. But he was not 100% sure and there was a risk of making the situation worse. We would rather be safe and have him ready for Volta a Catalunya and País Vasco.

"De La Fuente's kneecap was bothering him on the last day of Algarve and it basically stopped him for 10 days."

http://iamspecialized.com/road/news-article/paris-nice--contador-faces-first-serious-test
 

ravens

BANNED
Nov 22, 2009
780
0
0
ImmaculateKadence said:
If AC shows up wanting to race, it should be an easy win for him, but Valverde and Leipheimer will challenge. I even have a hunch about Christian VDV doing something of note. Ultimately, I suspect AC with an easy victory and Team RS taking the team classification....which we all know is a far greater accomplishment than winning the GC. :rolleyes:

I hear team class. is the rage.
 
Feb 21, 2010
1,007
0
0
Call your shot. Who will win P-N.

With decent form from Valv. and Sanchez, should not be tough for one of them to prevail.

Now, though I consider Danielson to lack sufficient intellect, his uphill snap is undeniable. Perhaps he can arrive, unless plans to use this race as a learning experience.

I don't see Levi having enough form yet. Nor do I think AC will appear for more than a stage or two, should be part of a larger training bloc for him at this point.

Gerrans could show as well.

any notion on the possible weather conditions?
 
Jun 18, 2009
2,078
2
0
Colm.Murphy said:
With decent form from Valv. and Sanchez, should not be tough for one of them to prevail.

Now, though I consider Danielson to lack sufficient intellect, his uphill snap is undeniable. Perhaps he can arrive, unless plans to use this race as a learning experience.

I don't see Levi having enough form yet. Nor do I think AC will appear for more than a stage or two, should be part of a larger training bloc for him at this point.

Gerrans could show as well.

any notion on the possible weather conditions?

What about Frank Schleck? I agree on AC too though he may want to avenge last year's debacle.

Tell ya what though, if AC does win, look out for the rest of the season.
 
Feb 21, 2010
1,007
0
0
richwagmn said:
What about Frank Schleck? I agree on AC too though he may want to avenge last year's debacle.

Tell ya what though, if AC does win, look out for the rest of the season.

I think this is a bit early for AC or Schleck. Levi is easing into the year, so I feel guys targeting July will not be turning mega watts this early.

for my money, sanchez would be my pick.
 
Sep 16, 2009
3,164
4
13,485
Caisse will win this race. It's a matter of which rider.

Sanchez wants to defend. Was ****ed off he wasn't in the initial selection of the team.

What will be the other objectives of your season?

LLS: “I would like to do as well as I did in 2009 and win a race like Paris-Nice again, which I consider is ‘my’ race since I have been trying to win it since I turned professional. Currently the team does not intend to let me start but I hope that Eusebio Unzúe will change his mind so that I can race in France. Apart from that it would of course be great to be able to win a third stage in the Tour de France and fight for the general classification in the Tour and the Vuelta at which I hope to arrive at the start in good condition and very motivated.”

As far as I'm concerned, Valverde is paying $6.50 for the win. Sanchez is paying $8.00 for the win. Put $100 on both and providing no one else wins, you will win your bet. Maybe do a $10-$20 hedge on Kreuziger and Martin at longer shots. Kreuziger is at 26-1 and Martin is at 34-1.
 
Aug 6, 2009
1,901
1
0
Sasquatch said:
As far as I'm concerned, Valverde is paying $6.50 for the win. Sanchez is paying $8.00 for the win. Put $100 on both and providing no one else wins, you will win your bet. Maybe do a $10-$20 hedge on Kreuziger and Martin at longer shots. Kreuziger is at 26-1 and Martin is at 34-1.

And then if Contador wins, which is the most likely, you'll have lost 250$. I don't bet for a very simple reason: The bookmakers tend to know more than I do, and they put enough slack into their odds, that even if some of you do in fact know more about cycling than they do, you still won't turn a profit.
 
May 6, 2009
8,522
1
0
Not sure if it has been posted, but I believe Paris - Nice is on Eurosport from 1:15am (QLD time) in Australia. Providing you have cable TV that is.
 
Jun 18, 2009
2,078
2
0
Colm.Murphy said:
I think this is a bit early for AC or Schleck. Levi is easing into the year, so I feel guys targeting July will not be turning mega watts this early.

for my money, sanchez would be my pick.

I could see Sammy taking this. Still... last year should have been ACs and his early season form didn't seem to hurt him in July one bit.
 
Sep 16, 2009
3,164
4
13,485
Cerberus said:
And then if Contador wins, which is the most likely, you'll have lost 250$. I don't bet for a very simple reason: The bookmakers tend to know more than I do, and they put enough slack into their odds, that even if some of you do in fact know more about cycling than they do, you still won't turn a profit.

I'm prepared to lose that 250.

And in anycase, I have made a profit over the last year.

To make a profit in cycling betting, you bet live.

For example.

Tour of Qatar - Stage 2.

Mol and Steurs in a 2 man break. 30km to go, 10 minutes on the peloton. Peloton split into 3. Both $8.

Back them both, you come out with a profit because they were never going to be caught.

Another example.

Tour of Qatar - Stage 4 or 5. Haussler over Farrar @ $1.90. Farrar, at the time, had a puncture and the winds were strong so he was off the back and was never going to contest the sprint. A bonus to this was he had another puncture not long after, and was out of contention. Haussler was in contention. Back Haussler, you win.

A further example.

Kuurne-Bruxells-Kuurne

3 were in the lead. The peloton were split. Thor Hushovd had 8 people with him. They were dropping off one by one. 40km to go. Heavy rain, heavy wind. Peloton breaking up, half of them would have pulled out (and they did). Hushovd group couldn't make the numbers. He was decreasing in numbers and was never going to catch them. They were over a minute up on the Hushovd group.

Odds at that stage:

Traksel $34
Flens $34
Stannard $28
Hushovd $4

All you needed was to put $10 on those first three and risk losing $30 to gain a profit of a couple hundred bucks. You could have put $10 on Hushovd and if it got up, you would have got your money back.

Also during KBK, there was a head to head. Someone crashed and was in pain, and he was up against someone else that was in the Hushovd group, his team-mate. I forget the guys name. You back the guy that didn't crash. I mean, if both don't win the stage, you get your money back. In those conditions, the guy that crashed was always going to pull out so you couldn't lose. You just needed to hope the other guy made it to the finish to win. If he didn't, you would have got your money back.

You wait for the situation to arise - and trust me, if you're patient enough, something will happen.

That's just three of many examples I have noticed over the last 12 months in doing live betting.

Live betting is the way to go. However, I can afford to lose $250, so it doesn't bother me if I lose $250 if Contador gets up to win. I will make a profit if one of them wins. That's enough for me.

You wait for the situation to arise and you be patient. If you can spare a couple hundred, you wait for long odds like this that can go in your favour. As it turns out, I thought the odds would have been Contador 2-3 and Valverde 3-4. Not Valverde at 6.50.

You can make a profit on cycling if you are smart about it and asses the risks.

If push comes to shove and you are worried about losing $250, you can always whack $200 on Contador.

20 on Kreuziger @ $19 - -$60
20 on Martin @ $41 - +$370
100 on Valverde @ $6.50 - +$210
100 on Sanchez @ $8.00 - +$340
200 on Contador @ $2.00 - -$40

So you can always hedge and instead of losing 450, you lose only 40 if Contador wins. But you gain to stand a profit if either Valverde or Sanchez win. Or even Martin for that matter.

One of those five riders will win. I will be surprised if another rider takes it. Considering all of those 5 riders can time trial better than Schleck but not S.Sanchez. But, those 5 riders, the finish on Stage 5, 10.7% over 3km, suit them more than Sanchez. But it suits Schleck.

The winner will be the rider that does a solid 8km time trial and gains 10-20 seconds and then can sprint to the line on that finish and get a further few seconds. Those 5 riders are capable of it.

But Sanchez isn't capable of it but he is capable of time trialing and Schleck is capable of it, but will lose time in that short time trial, so those two guys don't have what it takes compared to the other boys who can do both.
 
Jun 22, 2009
10,644
2
0
richwagmn said:
I could see Sammy taking this. Still... last year should have been ACs and his early season form didn't seem to hurt him in July one bit.

AC wins almost every stage race he enters. Obviously he peaks at certain times, but he rarely - almost never - seems out of form. Plus he had a lengthy break, should be able to go pretty hard (while resting up a bit in may) until july without getting fatigued.
 
Aug 6, 2009
1,901
1
0
Sasquatch said:
I'm prepared to lose that 250.

And in anycase, I have made a profit over the last year.

To make a profit in cycling betting, you bet live.

For example.

Tour of Qatar - Stage 2.

Mol and Steurs in a 2 man break. 30km to go, 10 minutes on the peloton. Peloton split into 3. Both $8.

Back them both, you come out with a profit because they were never going to be caught.

Another example.

Tour of Qatar - Stage 4 or 5. Haussler over Farrar @ $1.90. Farrar, at the time, had a puncture and the winds were strong so he was off the back and was never going to contest the sprint. A bonus to this was he had another puncture not long after, and was out of contention. Haussler was in contention. Back Haussler, you win.

A further example.

Kuurne-Bruxells-Kuurne

3 were in the lead. The peloton were split. Thor Hushovd had 8 people with him. They were dropping off one by one. 40km to go. Heavy rain, heavy wind. Peloton breaking up, half of them would have pulled out (and they did). Hushovd group couldn't make the numbers. He was decreasing in numbers and was never going to catch them. They were over a minute up on the Hushovd group.

Odds at that stage:

Traksel $34
Flens $34
Stannard $28
Hushovd $4

All you needed was to put $10 on those first three and risk losing $30 to gain a profit of a couple hundred bucks. You could have put $10 on Hushovd and if it got up, you would have got your money back.

Also during KBK, there was a head to head. Someone crashed and was in pain, and he was up against someone else that was in the Hushovd group, his team-mate. I forget the guys name. You back the guy that didn't crash. I mean, if both don't win the stage, you get your money back. In those conditions, the guy that crashed was always going to pull out so you couldn't lose. You just needed to hope the other guy made it to the finish to win. If he didn't, you would have got your money back.

You wait for the situation to arise - and trust me, if you're patient enough, something will happen.

That's just three of many examples I have noticed over the last 12 months in doing live betting.
I'm surprised they actually let you do that, but it makes sense.

Sasquatch said:
Live betting is the way to go. However, I can afford to lose $250, so it doesn't bother me if I lose $250 if Contador gets up to win. I will make a profit if one of them wins. That's enough for me.

You wait for the situation to arise and you be patient. If you can spare a couple hundred, you wait for long odds like this that can go in your favour. As it turns out, I thought the odds would have been Contador 2-3 and Valverde 3-4. Not Valverde at 6.50.
[...]
Fair enough, Personally I barely have 250$, let alone 250 I can afford to loose. Plus as I said I'm far from confident in my ability to outsmart the bookmakers, I'd like to take a look at the live betting though. What site(s) offer live betting?
 

Latest posts