- Jul 30, 2011
- 7,835
- 263
- 17,880
At the same time I feel like the UCI needs to enforce maximal tire width, mainly for the cobbled classics. Cause someone riding 35mm tires that blow up to 38mm on the rim as their front tire like Pogacar is trying to cheat the nature of this race, it lowers the skill cap needed and makes it easier for the lighter guys.I hold Paris-Roubaix slightly higher than the other Monuments on my estimation / valuation largely because it's not replicable by any other race on the calendar. There are other races on the calendar that ape what you can get from the four other Monuments, hell de Ronde has an entire sequence of races that use many of the same climbs in different orders that lead into it, with only the Koppenberg really being maintained as sacred to RVV. As for Liège, it comes at the end of a week of similarly-profiled hilly races in the same region; Sanremo is "just" a race for the durable sprinter with a few chances to get away in the last part of the course, its unique factor comes from the distance which is not really replicated anywhere on the calendar. Lombardia changes route like, every single year and so while I have a soft spot for it and it has its legendary sights, it doesn't have quite the same feeling of theatre when they reach particular landmarks as some of the other Monuments.
But there are no other races that truly replicate what Paris-Roubaix has to offer.
No. He said the same thing after winning San Remo.Maybe just the sting of losing his most sought prize, beaten in the sprint, in the legendary velodrome!
This was the one he wanted most. How can he even think about skipping next year if he's so obsessively hunting all five Monuments? But maybe not all in a single year anymore...
Also they need to police riding in the gutter better, there are so many rutted paths adjacent to the sectors now that we are seeing a lot of the cobbles simply being bypassed.At the same time I feel like the UCI needs to enforce maximal tire width, mainly for the cobbled classics. Cause someone riding 35mm tires that blow up to 38mm on the rim as their front tire like Pogacar is trying to cheat the nature of this race, it lowers the skill cap needed and makes it easier for the lighter guys.
On the other hand, it didn't seem to help his cornering whatsoever.At the same time I feel like the UCI needs to enforce maximal tire width, mainly for the cobbled classics. Cause someone riding 35mm tires that blow up to 38mm on the rim as their front tire like Pogacar is trying to cheat the nature of this race, it lowers the skill cap needed and makes it easier for the lighter guys.
Im not ready to believe some commentator on this unless team cops to itBad team planning. Different pedals from his teammate? Why?
Maybe thinking he would win PR today.No. He said the same thing after winning San Remo.
Fair enough. I can see your points but I don't really know what you could have realistically hoped for in today's race if a Van Aert win over Pogi is also dismissed as something we've seen lots of times before. It's not like Aivaras Mikutis and Victor Vercouillie were going to be duking it out for the win.To be honest I got pretty fed up of that too, but I got more fed up of the constant dismissing of women's cycling as a whole because of her dominance, admittedly I would therefore defend her to the hilt against that.
Does the top 10 seem random to you?It was a great race in the end even though I wasn't a fan of all the randomness.
Most had these in the top 5, but one was excused as he was really affected by a crash .... 2 months earlier.Does the top 10 seem random to you?
Pog, WVA, MvdP, Mads .... I think most everybody would have predicted them to finish top 10.
I could argue it's the same old faces once again, the opposite of randomness.
It will only be 363 days by tomorrow.And tomorrow, will start my yearly sadness of having to wait 364 days until we get to watch another.
I love that description 😆Asked if he is already looking for more next year, he said that it's not a race he enjoys or looks forward to, just one he is good at.
Of course, but I felt like with the mechanicals it might have left us with a larger selection, or some riders like Pedersen still there as wildcards at least until somewhere like Carrefour de l'Arbre. I think something like 2011 or 2016 where the big guns cancel each other out was unlikely, but I'd hoped that we'd still have more options on the table until a bit later on. As it was, we got a great middle phase of the race, but it all calmed down a lot for the last 40-50k once it was clear that the duo was decisively away, and the most excitement until they actually got to Roubaix was when Mathieu was getting the gap down to only around 20-25 seconds. And I don't really have the attachment to the narrative of van Aert or Visma-LeaseABike as an "underdog", because they're still so OP generally so I wasn't particularly attached to either outcome, I preferred van Aert of the two, but not enough to feel particularly invested in the outcome.Fair enough. I can see your points but I don't really know what you could have realistically hoped for in today's race if a Van Aert win over Pogi is also dismissed as something we've seen lots of times before. It's not like Aivaras Mikutis and Victor Vercouillie were going to be duking it out for the win.
Im not sure which one of Wout and Mads you're talking about here. Surely it's true for both of them.Most had these in the top 5, but one was excused as he was really affected by a crash .... 2 months earlier.
More so about the randomness in terms of deciding the win, if nothing happened MVP was very likely to win IMO, Wout with an outside chance to staying in his wheel for a sprint.Does the top 10 seem random to you?
Pog, WVA, MvdP, Mads .... I think most everybody would have predicted them to finish top 10.
I could argue it's the same old faces once again, the opposite of randomness.
But the randomness is the unique thing about PR that sets it apart from the other races. It is brutal in a way the other races aren’t, both physically and emotionally. It breaks hearts as well as bodies and to win it you need less unluck than your competitors. Indeed there have been many editions of the race where Wout was the strongest rider, but had no luck at all. The cycling gods must smile on you with many other races, but especially so for this one.More so about the randomness in terms of deciding the win, if nothing happened MVP was very likely to win IMO, Wout with an outside chance to staying in his wheel for a sprint.
That's why good teams win these races. Punctures and other mechanicals are going to happen. Teams must be prepared and ready along the route for every possibility.I dont understand people complaining about unfairness at PR with riders getting punctures? That is the nature of the race (and the sport) ...that these things can happen otherwise its not PR, its not cycling
Cycling is most of the time a 5 minute excitement slot in 4 hours of nothing much ,
Paris Roubaix is the most exciting of all pro cycling races imo exactly because anything can happen
Anyway so glad for Wout. It would have been a shame if he completed his career and never won PR considering he is so talented and tenacious and was built for cobbles
My complaint is the opposite. It was ridiculous for Alpecin to wait for Pogacar before Arenberg.I dont understand people complaining about unfairness at PR with riders getting punctures? That is the nature of the race (and the sport) ...that these things can happen otherwise its not PR, its not cycling
Cycling is most of the time a 5 minute excitement slot in 4 hours of nothing much ,
Paris Roubaix is the most exciting of all pro cycling races imo exactly because anything can happen
Anyway so glad for Wout. It would have been a shame if he completed his career and never won PR considering he is so talented and tenacious and was built for cobbles
