Paris-Roubaix 2026, one day monument, April 12

Page 81 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Sep 5, 2016
5,807
9,117
23,180
I am really trying to wrap my head around that what people saw this morning was something less than miraculous. So many great rides hard to think of a better finishes in both men's and women's race, 2 up on the velodrome for the men, close call and 3 up for the women with the singled out rider, leading it out and beating Visma great effort. Awesome racing!
 
Jun 19, 2009
6,402
1,481
20,680
Well done WVA, great to see him win after all his troubles the past few seasons. He needed and deserved to add another big win to his palmares, just a pity it wasn't a three way dust-up with MDVP, he rode brilliantly today despite the poor luck. Props to Pogacar as well for animating things as always. Will be difficult for him to win this race if WVA/MDaVP are there in shape, though maybe the chase today dented his strength. As for posters trying to claim WVA was not a worthy winner, what are ye smoking!!
Lots of opinions about who is strongest, who suffered the most time-losing situations, etc. It still takes an unusually strong and focused rider to win. And a sh*tload of luck. That goes for MvP who was just on the backside of that perfect day, again. Kudos to Wout and his team.
 
Sep 13, 2019
45
43
3,630
@ unchained

seriously?

I find it pathetic - not the dedication bit but self-contentment that it was a win OVER a world champion. He literally carried him over the finish line
 
Last edited:
Dec 6, 2013
8,716
8,152
23,180
We're not seeing many cases of a leading group being caught in the last 10-15 kilometers (at least in the big races). A shame. It used to be one of the characteristics of cycling, and as a viewer, you knew that the suspense would increase towards the end.

Now, the motorbikes keep the speed up and reduce factors like the wind and the drag. It's not that costly to be sitting out in front.

I know some say the motorbikes have always been there, sure - but the races are also different these years. The top 5 riders are much stronger than the second best. They don't need help to be dominating.

It would be great if there was more focus on removing the mentioned external factors. We have great ways of filming the riders nowadays, with drones supplementing the helicopters well. The front view shots from motorbikes are no longer as important to the understanding of the races. I also doubt that the world really needs dozens of still photographers on the road in a race.

In any case, fairness should be prioritised above media access. My suggestion is introducing a 3 second rule as the default minimum distance between motorbikes and riders.

(And yes, I was happy to see Van Aert take the win today instead of the usual suspect, but it doesn't change my view on the tendency.)
A lot to unpack there. The leading group in most races used to be out there so that their team didn't have to work and/or to help later in the race. Now the leading group is frequently the favorites who expect to win.*

I would argue that safety should be the priority followed by 'fairness' (hard to define I suppose), and then media access. They are usually more than three seconds away so IMO you are bringing them closer with a three second rule.

*In one day races. Obviously stage racing is a different beast most of the time.

You can read my thoughts about using drones in both of the related threads.
 
Jul 10, 2012
2,297
2,061
14,680
That was not my point. Sport as a competition makes sense if a better sportsman wins. If the logic that rewards a lesser sportsman prevails, sport looses and mediocracy (and show) takes over.

Without Pog WvA never wins today (and this I could not say for VdP's win last year). He should recognise that. Since he hasn't, I assume he believes he deserved it. If this logic prevails, the sport is dead.
That's absolutely not ciclismo

Sport would be very boring were it not for underdogs winning sometimes.
 
Apr 7, 2026
5
10
60
@ unchained

seriously?

I find it pathetic - not the dedication bit but self-contentment that it was a win OVER a world champion. He literally carried him over the finish line
“..I did stop believing a lot of times, but the next day I always woke up and fought for it again…honestly, there’s no more beautiful way than going to the line with the world champion… beating him in the sprint mano a mano is something really special for me…there were so many times where I was on the limit to stay on his wheel…” (maybe not word for word, but close)

Yes, Wout, how pathetic of you! And not once in the interview did he credit Tadej for towing him 50k, finishing it off with a beautiful leadout. Rude!
 
Mar 6, 2009
4,612
533
17,080
@ unchained

seriously?

I find it pathetic - not the dedication bit but self-contentment that it was a win OVER a world champion. He literally carried him over the finish line
If Wouts win bothered people today, they are either Pogacar fanboys or else cycling is the wrong sport for them. Never has cycling been about the strongest always winning, tactics and playing the game will always be part of the sport.

Now if it was a sprinter who does nothing the entire race and then sprints at for the win, there might be a case, but not today. Wout was the one who attacked to pull Pog clear, he set the pace over a few cobble sections, had to chase back on without team-mates and took his turns when he should. WVA played it perfectly today and was a very deserving winner. I really cannot believe are upset by that.
 
Congrats to Wout van Aert - great to see.

What can we say but an amazing edition and a very deserved champion in my opinion. Fastest P-R in history despite the crashes. All the contenders had bad luck. Wout had his bad luck but was so strong to fight back into a position where he could win. Once he was with Pogi he was always going to win the sprint in the velodrome.

Tadej did everything he could to win the race, another bridesmaid for him but no shame. After watching his skill on those cobbles it would be a brave person who bets he won't win this race one day - perhaps 2027?
 
Feb 20, 2012
55,385
46,696
28,180
That was not my point. Sport as a competition makes sense if a better sportsman wins. If the logic that rewards a lesser sportsman prevails, sport looses and mediocracy (and show) takes over.

Without Pog WvA never wins today (and this I could not say for VdP's win last year). He should recognise that. Since he hasn't, I assume he believes he deserved it. If this logic prevails, the sport is dead.
In all my years of wasting time on the cycling internet, I'm not sure I've ever read a comment as wrong as this one. It is wrong on every single level apart from the fact that it does appear to be English.
 
Apr 21, 2025
627
1,018
4,680
I'm still buzzing from that race. I feel like we've had a really good set of Spring races so far - the cobbled classics as a whole have been highly entertaining, MSR was an absolute riot, and now we've finally had a really fun Roubaix again, after a couple of years of impressive but uncompetitive van der Poel solos. I'm fairly optimistic for the Ardennes too, especially with del Toro out of Amstel and Flèche, and Remco and Seixas in great form, so hopefully a more competitive LBL than the last two years.
 
Sep 5, 2016
5,807
9,117
23,180
@ unchained

seriously?

I find it pathetic - not the dedication bit but self-contentment that it was a win OVER a world champion. He literally carried him over the finish line
We obviously disagree on racing,
Pogacar and Van Aert played zero games, each guy knew that a bunch of monkey business for position would give hope to the chase.
Each rider traded decent pulls, and I would have bet even money that in a drag race after 258k would be one thing but the Tadej chase obviously burned some matches,
Pogacar instead of taking even a momentary rest after chasing really, really hard, he jumped again and caused further chaos. Brilliant bike racing, Van Aert did everything that has been criticized from other races this year, he put some serious responsibility on Laporte who raced as good as anyone including the winner.
To lose by less than a bike against Wout is a no shame event. Please keep in mind what Van Aert accomplished, he didn't just beat World Champion Pogacar he kept him from a classics sweep. I get the idea of trying to downplay the win, I don't agree or understand it,
but just poopooing because you can is a thing I get it.
If you think the race blew and guys were holding something back, chases after crashes, bike problems, bike changes were all fake.. Cool..
This all could have been AI generated ,
my beer brothers from Sint -Niklaas were there in person and enjoyed it, I think it was a great day for the race, for the World Champion, for Belgium, for bike racing, and for Wout and his family, friends, teammates, fans..no wet blankets will ruin how good all this made me feel.. Incredible race.
 
Mar 4, 2011
8,889
11,913
23,180
It was a great race in the end even though I wasn't a fan of all the randomness. Having that opinion definitely isn't the reason I have a problem with half the forum, it's quite easy to see what is if you're willing.
That is the case sometimes, which is when I just switch to just watching rather than reading/ commenting.
 
Jun 1, 2015
2,495
3,786
17,180
As it was said Pogacar looked gassed with 50 km to go.
If MVDP didn't have a flat he would have destroyed him by minutes.

That was not my point. Sport as a competition makes sense if a better sportsman wins. If the logic that rewards a lesser sportsman prevails, sport looses and mediocracy (and show) takes over.

Without Pog WvA never wins today (and this I could not say for VdP's win last year). He should recognise that. Since he hasn't, I assume he believes he deserved it. If this logic prevails, the sport is dead.

@ unchained

seriously?

I find it pathetic - not the dedication bit but self-contentment that it was a win OVER a world champion. He literally carried him over the finish line
Some surprising takes on here. A guy wins the fastest P-R in history, has multiple mechanicals, looks strong AF, never falters, launches multiple attacks, plays it perfectly, and wins without any indication that he was at his limit, and this is what some have to say? Wout has had some monstrous performances, from C-E to Mont Ventoux to Montmartre to today. When he is at his best, he is as good as anyone. That’s it. He is better than Pogacar at this type of race, at least today. And I see no evidence that MVDP would have done anything other than ridden with them had he not made some dumb decisions after a mechanical.
 
Jul 20, 2017
606
764
12,180
I'm a big fan of Pogacar, and wanted him to win Roubaix this year, to achieve 5 monuments in one year. He was strong today, but not as strong as VDP.
Not strong enough to be WVA (3rd strongest today).

For once WVA played it correctly (at least from Arenberg ).
After all those failures, he is the most beautifull winner here.
I have not forget that heavy crash just before the holy week, after missing precious time with his young kid(s) in winter, preparing for nothing.
I have not forget that it took 3 falls to remove him from a Vuelta where he was leading KOM and Points.
I have not forget that punctures in Carrefour de l'arbre, the one year he looked stronger than VDP.
I do have forget the countless falls, punctures, injuries, bringing back VDP on your wheel, that made most people think Wout was washed up.
Last year he won in Paris. Today in Roubaix. He won against the greatest rider of all time, again.

Pogacar may win in the future, and I hope he will once, but today, we got perhaps the most deservefull winner. One can say cycling won.
 

TRENDING THREADS