loge1884 said:Bora announced the Peter's support team for RvV:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/bora-hansgrohe-name-team-to-back-peter-sagan-at-tour-of-flanders/
Oss and Burghardt will perhaps be his most valuable mates ... Bodnar could perhaps power if something happens early on ... personally I would rather have chosen Rudi Selig or Benedetti instead of the elder brother, but maybe the family ties give some marginal gains ...
Keram said:As usual in Ronde thread Sagan is again tactically ineptHe did not do more mistakes than Vanmarcke Gva or Benoot. QS again schooled them big time and Rouibax wont be different. Sagan only mistake besides when he missed decisive attack as any other contender was that he was too strong on Paterberg. If Vanmarcke and Bennot sticked to his wheel they would have some chance against Terpstra but Sagan is quite a poor roleur comparing to Terpatra or other classic men. But he tried at least.
Dekker_Tifosi said:Sagan is overrated in these kind of races.
He's explosive, but cannot hold a gap. So then it's hard to win. He had one year where he did hold the gap. But now seems to have lost even that quality again
Keram said:Dekker_Tifosi said:Sagan is overrated in these kind of races.
He's explosive, but cannot hold a gap. So then it's hard to win. He had one year where he did hold the gap. But now seems to have lost even that quality again
He maybe should try ardennes insted of cobbles than. But yeah. He is quite poor roleur and in small groups nobody wants to collaborate with him. Almost impossible for him to win
Gigs_98 said:Yeah it's just super difficult to ride against Quickstep. If Sagan follows the move the Terpstra stops working, if Sagan himself attacks Quickstep will counter and then refuse to work. Sagan either has to be strong enough to just drop everyone or a Quickstep rider who attack with him has to be so strong that he fancies his chances against Sagan. You know, Boonen in his prime definitely hadn't refused to work with Sagan as he would have had a good chance to win. If Sagan rides to the Kwaremont together with Stybar, Stybar won't expect to have a big chance if he works as much as Sagan. And even if he had a decent chance QS chances would probably still be better if he sits on his wheel as there are still guys like Gilbert and Terpstra in the team who in a 1 on 1 against any rider in the peloton definitely have a better chance than Stybar against Sagan.
Imo Sagan only made one big mistake, which was not putting the hammer down right at the beginning of the Kwaremont. Remember how close Cancellara came to him in 2016 despite being far down at the beginning of the climb? Sagan only really went all out on the last few meters of the Paterberg and that way you might gap the rest of your group, but you can't catch the rider in front. Tbf catching Terpstra would have been close to impssbile anyway, but that way it at least could have gotten closer.
SKSemtex said:Keram said:Dekker_Tifosi said:Sagan is overrated in these kind of races.
He's explosive, but cannot hold a gap. So then it's hard to win. He had one year where he did hold the gap. But now seems to have lost even that quality again
He maybe should try ardennes insted of cobbles than. But yeah. He is quite poor roleur and in small groups nobody wants to collaborate with him. Almost impossible for him to win
This I said three years ago. Ardenas are much better for him.
Keram said:As usual in Ronde thread Sagan is again tactically ineptHe did not do more mistakes than Vanmarcke Gva or Benoot. QS again schooled them big time and Rouibax wont be different. Sagan only mistake besides when he missed decisive attack as any other contender was that he was too strong on Paterberg. If Vanmarcke and Bennot sticked to his wheel they would have some chance against Terpstra but Sagan is quite a poor roleur comparing to Terpatra or other classic men. But he tried at least.
Anticipating the last sequence (Oude Kwaremont - Paterberg) is the winning formula these past few years.Dekker_Tifosi said:Sagan is overrated in these kind of races.
He's explosive, but cannot hold a gap. So then it's hard to win. He had one year where he did hold the gap. But now seems to have lost even that quality again
Blanco said:SKSemtex said:Keram said:Dekker_Tifosi said:Sagan is overrated in these kind of races.
He's explosive, but cannot hold a gap. So then it's hard to win. He had one year where he did hold the gap. But now seems to have lost even that quality again
He maybe should try ardennes insted of cobbles than. But yeah. He is quite poor roleur and in small groups nobody wants to collaborate with him. Almost impossible for him to win
This I said three years ago. Ardenas are much better for him.
Only Amstel. Other two he can not win, he would need to shred at least 5 kilos for that.
Pretty much. He did it in Flanders 2016, but in 2016-2017 he was also better than this. Quite a lot actually - I don't know whats wrong with him this year.Dekker_Tifosi said:Sagan is overrated in these kind of races.
He's explosive, but cannot hold a gap. So then it's hard to win. He had one year where he did hold the gap. But now seems to have lost even that quality again
Yeah, but that was 2 years ago and a very easy stage, relatively, up until that point. In this scenario, in 2018, there's no chance he is remotely close to hold that gap to the group. Mads Pedersen, the 21 year old dude who had spent lots of time in the break, was better after Paterberg.SKSemtex said:Some people say he is not good rouler but when was the last time somebody cooperate with him when he made the selection.
Probably TDF 2016 with Froome in echelon stage. He was pretty damn good rouler that day.
Blanco said:SKSemtex said:Keram said:Dekker_Tifosi said:Sagan is overrated in these kind of races.
He's explosive, but cannot hold a gap. So then it's hard to win. He had one year where he did hold the gap. But now seems to have lost even that quality again
He maybe should try ardennes insted of cobbles than. But yeah. He is quite poor roleur and in small groups nobody wants to collaborate with him. Almost impossible for him to win
This I said three years ago. Ardenas are much better for him.
Only Amstel. Other two he can not win, he would need to shred at least 5 kilos for that.
Valv.Piti said:Pretty much. He did it in Flanders 2016, but in 2016-2017 he was also better than this. Quite a lot actually - I don't know whats wrong with him this year.Dekker_Tifosi said:Sagan is overrated in these kind of races.
He's explosive, but cannot hold a gap. So then it's hard to win. He had one year where he did hold the gap. But now seems to have lost even that quality again
Yeah, but that was 2 years ago and a very easy stage, relatively, up until that point. In this scenario, in 2018, there's no chance he is remotely close to hold that gap to the group. Mads Pedersen, the 21 year old dude who had spent lots of time in the break, was better after Paterberg.SKSemtex said:Some people say he is not good rouler but when was the last time somebody cooperate with him when he made the selection.
Probably TDF 2016 with Froome in echelon stage. He was pretty damn good rouler that day.
I hope so too. But for Sagan to win, it must come to a sprint, he won't win solo this year, that's for sure. The more I see, the more I start to think, that for some reason he really is targeting Innsbruck.Keram said:Imo for Roubaix Bora should be more offensive than cotrolling the race. Bodnar, Burghardt and Oss are more suited to Roubaix than Ronde. Maybe Burghardt or Bodnar should try some early attack. Would be good if Oss race was similar as last year. Easier to said than did of course.
Blanco said:SKSemtex said:Keram said:Dekker_Tifosi said:Sagan is overrated in these kind of races.
He's explosive, but cannot hold a gap. So then it's hard to win. He had one year where he did hold the gap. But now seems to have lost even that quality again
He maybe should try ardennes insted of cobbles than. But yeah. He is quite poor roleur and in small groups nobody wants to collaborate with him. Almost impossible for him to win
This I said three years ago. Ardenas are much better for him.
Only Amstel. Other two he can not win, he would need to shred at least 5 kilos for that.
Matthews was 4th in LBL last year. If it's raced passively, no reason for Sagan to not be up there.Koronin said:Blanco said:SKSemtex said:Keram said:Dekker_Tifosi said:Sagan is overrated in these kind of races.
He's explosive, but cannot hold a gap. So then it's hard to win. He had one year where he did hold the gap. But now seems to have lost even that quality again
He maybe should try ardennes insted of cobbles than. But yeah. He is quite poor roleur and in small groups nobody wants to collaborate with him. Almost impossible for him to win
This I said three years ago. Ardenas are much better for him.
Only Amstel. Other two he can not win, he would need to shred at least 5 kilos for that.
Amstel maybe. However for Fleche Wallone and LBL he needs to wait until Valverde retires and even then it's unlikely unless he sheds several kilos and starts climbing better.
