The same debate has been had about Cancellara and Gilbert. They can't handle the mountains and they are too heavy like Sagan.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
movingtarget said:The same debate has been had about Cancellara and Gilbert. They can't handle the mountains and they are too heavy like Sagan.
jaylew said:Valverde hasn't won Amstel but he has won LBL twice.
Anyway, I definitely think it's possible for a Liège winner to win the Tour.
Zweistein said:Andy Schleck has won LBL.
Frank has won Amstel.
Valverde has won Amstel.
Cunego has won Amstel.
I don't think it has really ever been that common for GC riders to win classics. Hinault winning Paris Roubaix is a pretty odd fluke.
theyoungest said:Why is it that every good rider has to be considered a possible Tour contender? Cancellara, Gilbert, Sagan, Devolder ()... it's like saying Messi could make a great central defender. He could, but he would need a complete transformation.
Carlo Algatrensig said:If you think that Sagan will win the TDF in the next five years the British bookmaker William Hill are offering odds of 12/1. They must have been impressed by his performance at TA as the other week it was 16/1.