The_Captain said:
I know this topic has been argued to death in the clinic already but I think there is a clear difference between attitudes to doping and the aptitude to dope.
I think (and whether or not it's true is another discussion) is that the point here is that one culture has more of a "it's only cheating if you get caught" attitude whether as the other culture (unless you're Lance Armstrong) know full well that it's cheating but do it anyway.
The temptation to break the rules to win is unfortunately uniformly human, it's just at what point on the scale of external pressures that you're willing to do it they fall. I'd suggest that culturally this just means that for one culture it's just further along the scale than for the other. How much so obviously depends on a whole host of other factors.
And, if you are like Lance Armstrong, then it is part of the explicit choreography with as much attention and investment, if not more, than any other part of the preparation including selection of teammates, as well as the explicit contracting of insurance deals on fraudulent premises to multiply the payout.
Lance exemplifies: If you want to win, you need to be all in.
And, I would suggest, that the shear number of blood bags collected and stored via OP for some athletes underscores that the Lance strategy was neither limited to Lance, nor was it selectively applied by Spanish, Italian or Anglo-Saxon cyclists exclusively.
Of course, at least the Italian cyclist of note didn't inhale.
Dave.