I wonder where ASO draws the line with this 'protecting the image of cycling' argument, (and even more how strict and impartially they are going to apply it...)
If a cyclist turns out to be a racist, is that enough reason to exclude him from participation?
If a cyclist openly admits he is gay, could that perhaps taint the image of cycling?
If a cyclist votes Vlaams Blok/Democrat/Partido Popular, could they make a call on that as well?
If a cyclist is an alcoholic/gambling addict, will ASO assist in getting him into rehab instead of letting him compete for the Polka Dot Jersey?
What if we have a Maddof-style cyclist who embezzles money, but somehow evades jail time. Can they exclude him for that...
I think they need to start defining what the "image of cycling" really is.
If a cyclist turns out to be a racist, is that enough reason to exclude him from participation?
If a cyclist openly admits he is gay, could that perhaps taint the image of cycling?
If a cyclist votes Vlaams Blok/Democrat/Partido Popular, could they make a call on that as well?
If a cyclist is an alcoholic/gambling addict, will ASO assist in getting him into rehab instead of letting him compete for the Polka Dot Jersey?
What if we have a Maddof-style cyclist who embezzles money, but somehow evades jail time. Can they exclude him for that...
I think they need to start defining what the "image of cycling" really is.