• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Poll of new era, second round

Page 2 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

How do you feel about SKY team?

  • HATE them.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
spalco said:
That's one of the things I really like about them.

How can you not love 8 men giving their all and sacrificing everything for one of their mates to win? If Colombia or Androni does that effectively to win a stage (let alone a big stage race), everyone here celebrates.
Cycling is not a team sport.
 
May 28, 2012
2,779
0
0
Netserk said:
Cycling is not a team sport.

An individual team sport is the best description, but saying teams don't matter at all goes too far in my book. Close to all victories nowadays are the result of good teamwork.
 
Pentacycle said:
An individual team sport is the best description, but saying teams don't matter at all goes too far in my book. Close to all victories nowadays are the result of good teamwork.
I didn't say that teams don't matter, but that it's not a team sport. Difference.

Today Degenkolb won the stage. Not Argos.
 
Netserk said:
Cycling is not a team sport.

I honestly don't understand how you could say that.

What's the point of 200 men starting in a GT if (maybe) a couple dozen only ever have even a chance for glory? Or half a dozen if you focus on the general classement?

I'm very much baffled by this comment in more ways than I can state in just a short reply.

Why don't you skip the road season and just watch track racing and cyclocross?
 
spalco said:
I honestly don't understand how you could say that.

What's the point of 200 men starting in a GT if (maybe) a couple dozen only ever have even a chance for glory? Or half a dozen if you focus on the general classement?

I'm very much baffled by this comment in more ways than I can state in just a short reply.

Why don't you skip the road season and just watch track racing and cyclocross?
Mentally cycling is an individual sport. There is only one winner. All the rest are losers. Whether you're 2nd or 102nd you still lost.

Did Froome win or lose the Tour last year? He lost it.
 

airstream

BANNED
Mar 29, 2011
5,122
0
0
Netserk, in short you say they are not stronger individually and only helpers is the reason why they win the races?
 
Mar 10, 2009
6,158
1
0
I find them to be yet another Cycling team. Sure they won le Tour and I think that has many with their panties in a bunch because their favorite rider didn't win and well blame everything on the winner, in this case Team Sky. Its been the same since the dawn of Bike Racing, some of you's need to read up, the winners always get hated on by some proportion of the fans because their rider lost to that team (which ever team/rider won). If you look at any team under the same microscope you'll find an equal number of faults, of course when you look at your favorite team/rider's team you won't see anything wrong, but those who don't like your team will see a mountain of faults to poke at.

Had you said if I hated a particular rider on Team Sky well then I might of voted differently.
 

airstream

BANNED
Mar 29, 2011
5,122
0
0
Netserk said:
I have no idea what you tried to say, but I know I didn't write what you just wrote. I guess that mean no? :confused:

I tried to formulate what you meant in your reasonings about 'team sport'
 
indifferent

i'm british ...........been following cycling since the 1970's...........when british

successes were so few and far apart

wiggo stole the glorious moment when at last a british rider won the tour

but listening to all the haterz here on the forum make me like team sky more!

Mark L
 
Apr 8, 2010
1,257
0
0
Netserk said:
Mentally cycling is an individual sport. There is only one winner. All the rest are losers.

I think many cycling fans see cycling as both as an individual and a team sport. Many even say this is part of what makes cycling beautiful.

If you insist on a on-dimensional, binary perception of cycling you could argue that there is one winner of each race and that the rest are losers.
But that is not how things are usually addressed.

For instance, in football or tennis it would be normal to ask the loser of a match how they feel about loosing (in a post-match interview). Nobody in their right mind would ask Danny Pate about how he felt about losing yesterdays GdI stage. It just doesn't make sense to ask that question because the stage was never his to lose.
 
Apr 8, 2010
1,257
0
0
When they first came to the road cycling scene i didn't like them.
But they've followed a steep learning curve and improved a lot, which I respect and I like a lot of their riders (but the again I like most riders).
Overall I guess I'm mostly indifferent about Team Sky as a team.
 
I like them. I believe in clean cycling and I believe SKY is clean. They are making racing more and more professional and show there is a lot of room for improvement with insights from other sports.

Maybe their racing style aint the most fun to watch, but its their tactic and it works.
 

TRENDING THREADS