Merckx index said:This was discussed in the thread: What percentage gain does blood doping/epo actually give? As I summarized in post #33:
In which thread? Not this one.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Merckx index said:This was discussed in the thread: What percentage gain does blood doping/epo actually give? As I summarized in post #33:
In which thread? Not this one.
halamala said:Criterium du Dauphine, Stage 6, Final Climb Le Collet d'Allevard
Joaquim Rodriguez
Elevation / Höhenmeter [m] : 961 m
Distance / Streckenlänge [Km] : 11.2 Km
Time in seconds / Fahrzeit in Sekunden [sec] : 1926 = 32 min 6 sec = 32:06
Weight rider / Gewicht Fahrer [kg] : 57 kg
Weight bicycle, clothes etc. / Gewicht Fahrrad [kg] : 8 kg
Grade / mittlere Seigung : 8.5 %
Average speed / mittlere Geschwindigkeit : 20.9 Km/h
Total weight / Gesamtgewicht : 65.0 kg
Power : 385.0 Watt
Power / kg : 6.7 Watt / kg
Source: [ http://www.rst.mp-all.de/bergauf.htm ]
18-Valve. (pithy) said:That's a VAM of 961 m / .5335 h = 1801
Very impressive for a 32-minute effort...
halamala said:Criterium du Dauphine, Stage 6, Final Climb Le Collet d'Allevard
Joaquim Rodriguez
Elevation / Höhenmeter [m] : 961 m
Distance / Streckenlänge [Km] : 11.2 Km
Time in seconds / Fahrzeit in Sekunden [sec] : 1926 = 32 min 6 sec = 32:06
Weight rider / Gewicht Fahrer [kg] : 57 kg
Weight bicycle, clothes etc. / Gewicht Fahrrad [kg] : 8 kg
Grade / mittlere Seigung : 8.5 %
Average speed / mittlere Geschwindigkeit : 20.9 Km/h
Total weight / Gesamtgewicht : 65.0 kg
Power : 385.0 Watt
Power / kg : 6.7 Watt / kg
Source: [ http://www.rst.mp-all.de/bergauf.htm ]
Sorry, my source is ASO.Le breton said:Where did you get those numbers?
Given A.S.O.'s lack of attention to such details I hope they are not your source..
halamala said:Sorry, my source is ASO.
Alex Simmons/RST said:Haven't read whole thread. I note lots of calculations without taking wind conditions into account. Even slight head/tail winds (or drafting from leading vehicles) make quite a sizeable difference to the power estimates (or ascension rates for a given W/kg).
I plotted the variance in W/kg estimates for Alpe d'Huez given different wind conditions in this 2010 blog post here:
http://alex-cycle.blogspot.com/2010/07/ascent-rates-and-power-to-body-mass.html
Re-calculation [Elevation 947 m]Ferminal said:The range would be between 947m and 961m. Take the bottom as either 461m (ASO) or 475m (Salite). I think the finish is most likely the 1422m given by ASO, as it finishes before it flattens out. ASO probably just started the climb a few hundred metres lower (hence the 461m). The ASO numbers look to be quite correct.
You have to wait until Tuesday afternoon (GMT+0).Escarabajo said:Where is Halamala with those Tour de Suisse numbers?
Ok.halamala said:You have to wait until Tuesday afternoon (GMT+0).
It does not take much wind. For instance we would barely feel a wind of 0.5 - 1m/s, yet even that can have a sizeable impact on the power estimate.Le breton said:I have never felt wind in the bottom half of Alpe d'Huez. However, in the last km it can be a factor, unfavorable.
+11Alex Simmons/RST said:<snip>
Estimates need to have error bars or ranges shown. Not just for wind, but also for other assumptions (especially mass & gradient).
Alex Simmons/RST said:It does not take much wind. For instance we would barely feel a wind of 0.5 - 1m/s, yet even that can have a sizeable impact on the power estimate.
Fixed for strict accuracy.python said:+11 +/-15%
i lost count how many times this has been stressed.
i believe some regular contributors realise this, most readers likely don't.
Add to that the constant changes in kinetic energy which usually if not never is taken into account because we usually assume constant speed. The closest we get to the power numbers is when we do it by sections but even then you have to assume constant speed for that section and wind hitting in the same direction.acoggan said:It is also worth mentioning that most vane- or cup-type anemometers (by far the most common type, especially of those sold to consumers) can't measure wind speeds that are that low.
IOW, you could be standing at the side of the road taking measurements with one, record a value of zero, and yet the rider(s) would need to produce more (or less, depending on which way the wind is blowing) power than you calculate because of the wind.