Red mRick said:Dumoulin starts the Tour
The Vuelta starts to look like a wasteland.
Isn't it always pretty much? Some people crashes, some people unexpectedly gets better in the Vuelta than in the Tour or whatever, it usually ends up as a race on a very high level. But maybe more so this year than previous years, I will agree with that. The Giro-Tour doubles doesn't help on that.Red Rick said:Dumoulin starts the Tour
The Vuelta starts to look like a wasteland.
Red Rick said:Dumoulin starts the Tour
The Vuelta starts to look like a wasteland.
The Vuelta has had very good fields in the last few years and in some cases easily the strongest field of the year, partially because of many of the stronger GT riders doubling up and because nobody in their right mind attempted Giro/Tour.Valv.Piti said:Isn't it always pretty much? Some people crashes, some people unexpectedly gets better in the Vuelta than in the Tour or whatever, it usually ends up as a race on a very high level. But maybe more so this year than previous years, I will agree with that. The Giro-Tour doubles doesn't help on that.Red Rick said:Dumoulin starts the Tour
The Vuelta starts to look like a wasteland.
I have a feeling that Movistar absolutely will dominate that race.
Is this when we start the Contador comeback campaign...?Red Rick said:Dumoulin starts the Tour
The Vuelta starts to look like a wasteland.
Let the man enjoy his retirementLaFlorecita said:Is this when we start the Contador comeback campaign...?Red Rick said:Dumoulin starts the Tour
The Vuelta starts to look like a wasteland.
If he can be good for 3 weeks already, then sure. Right now it seems to me it would be great for Yates to go for it. 3rd week breakdown shouldn't be nearly as much of a problem in this Vuelta than in this Giro. But then there's the Worlds.Valv.Piti said:Sure, right now it looks like a weak Vuelta, but its hard to say anything until after the Tour depending on lots of stuff.
We could see a surprise winner, but the Movistar-riders haven't ridden much and are probably all going for Tour + Vuelta. Apart from that, its hard to see so many contender as of now. Bernal could realistically have won, I think.
Red Rick said:Dumoulin starts the Tour
The Vuelta starts to look like a wasteland.
LaFlorecita said:That makes sense - still, won't matter all that much, domestiques will just have to spend a tiny bit more energy to get to their team leader.Netserk said:No neutral start that day.LaFlorecita said:Much ado about nothing - my guess is this new "starting order" won't change anything. Only thing I am wondering is if they'll cut the neutralized start - if not, the effect will be even smaller.
Valv.Piti said:Sure, right now it looks like a weak Vuelta, but its hard to say anything until after the Tour depending on lots of stuff.
We could see a surprise winner, but the Movistar-riders haven't ridden much and are probably all going for Tour + Vuelta. Apart from that, its hard to see so many contender as of now. Bernal could realistically have won, I think.
drebelo said:Valv.Piti said:Sure, right now it looks like a weak Vuelta, but its hard to say anything until after the Tour depending on lots of stuff.
We could see a surprise winner, but the Movistar-riders haven't ridden much and are probably all going for Tour + Vuelta. Apart from that, its hard to see so many contender as of now. Bernal could realistically have won, I think.
I really dont get this Bernal hype. I know he is a extreme talented guy, but look at his results and tell me how can this show anything that makes you think he can perform over 3 weeks and win the GC in the Vuelta. In catalunya the guy was going really great but was second to a guy who I hardly doubt can be a GT podium contender anymore. In Romandie he was beaten by Roglic, which never did a top 10 in a GC and in California the only guy he beat that is a top 10 GT GC contender was Yates coming from an injury.
I´m not downsizing is achievements, I just dont get how a guy who never raced a GT, and never shown any capability whatsoever to hold a shape for three weeks be considered an hevy favourite for the Vuelta. I still think he can make top 5 or so but from top 5 to win it goes a big distance.
Honestly, I'd just go for it and see how it goes. I'd basically tell him to test out if he can fight for the win, and go for it if he can, and if he can't, the hell with it and go for stages.Climbing said:drebelo said:Valv.Piti said:Sure, right now it looks like a weak Vuelta, but its hard to say anything until after the Tour depending on lots of stuff.
We could see a surprise winner, but the Movistar-riders haven't ridden much and are probably all going for Tour + Vuelta. Apart from that, its hard to see so many contender as of now. Bernal could realistically have won, I think.
I really dont get this Bernal hype. I know he is a extreme talented guy, but look at his results and tell me how can this show anything that makes you think he can perform over 3 weeks and win the GC in the Vuelta. In catalunya the guy was going really great but was second to a guy who I hardly doubt can be a GT podium contender anymore. In Romandie he was beaten by Roglic, which never did a top 10 in a GC and in California the only guy he beat that is a top 10 GT GC contender was Yates coming from an injury.
I´m not downsizing is achievements, I just dont get how a guy who never raced a GT, and never shown any capability whatsoever to hold a shape for three weeks be considered an hevy favourite for the Vuelta. I still think he can make top 5 or so but from top 5 to win it goes a big distance.
And most of all shouldn't race a GT with GC in mind at that age imho.
That's exactly how you burn young riders...
Gigs_98 said:Lol at Dumoulin having better odds than Nibali. What are froome's current odds btw?Avoriaz said:Latest odds from Bet365 (without Froome):
1. Porte 9/4
2. Quintana 7/2
3. Landa 11/2
4. Dumoulin 11/2
5. Nibali 13/2
6. Bernal 14/1
7. Bardet 14/1
8. Valverde 16/1
9. Thomas 16/1
10. Uran 18/1
Surprised that Porte would come out on top, but could be influence of an English language site maybe.
Fuglsang is 25/1, Mollema 40/1. Soler 200/1, kelderman 80/1, Gaudu and Meintjes 600/1...
Avoriaz said:Gigs_98 said:Lol at Dumoulin having better odds than Nibali. What are froome's current odds btw?Avoriaz said:Latest odds from Bet365 (without Froome):
1. Porte 9/4
2. Quintana 7/2
3. Landa 11/2
4. Dumoulin 11/2
5. Nibali 13/2
6. Bernal 14/1
7. Bardet 14/1
8. Valverde 16/1
9. Thomas 16/1
10. Uran 18/1
Surprised that Porte would come out on top, but could be influence of an English language site maybe.
Fuglsang is 25/1, Mollema 40/1. Soler 200/1, kelderman 80/1, Gaudu and Meintjes 600/1...
No odds currently being offered for Froome
Where is Roglic? There are some riders that are not proven GC and are there. So should Roglic.Gigs_98 said:Lol at Dumoulin having better odds than Nibali. What are froome's current odds btw?Avoriaz said:Latest odds from Bet365 (without Froome):
1. Porte 9/4
2. Quintana 7/2
3. Landa 11/2
4. Dumoulin 11/2
5. Nibali 13/2
6. Bernal 14/1
7. Bardet 14/1
8. Valverde 16/1
9. Thomas 16/1
10. Uran 18/1
Surprised that Porte would come out on top, but could be influence of an English language site maybe.
Fuglsang is 25/1, Mollema 40/1. Soler 200/1, kelderman 80/1, Gaudu and Meintjes 600/1...
Escarabajo said:Where is Roglic? There are some riders that are not proven GC and are there. So should Roglic.Gigs_98 said:Lol at Dumoulin having better odds than Nibali. What are froome's current odds btw?Avoriaz said:Latest odds from Bet365 (without Froome):
1. Porte 9/4
2. Quintana 7/2
3. Landa 11/2
4. Dumoulin 11/2
5. Nibali 13/2
6. Bernal 14/1
7. Bardet 14/1
8. Valverde 16/1
9. Thomas 16/1
10. Uran 18/1
Surprised that Porte would come out on top, but could be influence of an English language site maybe.
Fuglsang is 25/1, Mollema 40/1. Soler 200/1, kelderman 80/1, Gaudu and Meintjes 600/1...
Roglic: 20/1Escarabajo said:Where is Roglic? There are some riders that are not proven GC and are there. So should Roglic.Gigs_98 said:Lol at Dumoulin having better odds than Nibali. What are froome's current odds btw?Avoriaz said:Latest odds from Bet365 (without Froome):
1. Porte 9/4
2. Quintana 7/2
3. Landa 11/2
4. Dumoulin 11/2
5. Nibali 13/2
6. Bernal 14/1
7. Bardet 14/1
8. Valverde 16/1
9. Thomas 16/1
10. Uran 18/1
Surprised that Porte would come out on top, but could be influence of an English language site maybe.
Fuglsang is 25/1, Mollema 40/1. Soler 200/1, kelderman 80/1, Gaudu and Meintjes 600/1...
Bot. Sky_Bot said:Roglic: 20/1Escarabajo said:Where is Roglic? There are some riders that are not proven GC and are there. So should Roglic.Gigs_98 said:Lol at Dumoulin having better odds than Nibali. What are froome's current odds btw?Avoriaz said:Latest odds from Bet365 (without Froome):
1. Porte 9/4
2. Quintana 7/2
3. Landa 11/2
4. Dumoulin 11/2
5. Nibali 13/2
6. Bernal 14/1
7. Bardet 14/1
8. Valverde 16/1
9. Thomas 16/1
10. Uran 18/1
Surprised that Porte would come out on top, but could be influence of an English language site maybe.
Fuglsang is 25/1, Mollema 40/1. Soler 200/1, kelderman 80/1, Gaudu and Meintjes 600/1...
Koronin said:Movistar's 3 amigos will be going from the Tour to the Vuelta although most likely a slight shuffling of positions where Valverde will be the first leader as he's chasing history there.
Broccolidwarf said:Why are we talking about the Vuelta, in the TdF thread?