Altitude said:That applies more to the early-mid 90's. By the time Lance was dominating they had already gone back to good old fashioned blood doping.
Armstrong was still using EPO in the 2000's
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Altitude said:That applies more to the early-mid 90's. By the time Lance was dominating they had already gone back to good old fashioned blood doping.
ad9898 said:Armstrong of 2000-2001 would have Contador beaten relatively easily, he could put minutes into his rivals, including Pantani, who is still lorded as probably the best pure climber, despite the dope issues.
Hautacam in 2000 stands out particularly, he dropped Pantani and Ullrich quite easily then rode across 2 mins to the best climbers in that tour (Virenque, Escartin, Jiminez), then dropped them by a minute plus.
Probably the most impressive climb in modern TdF history and IMO much better than Alpe in 2001. Contador has done nothing remotely comparable, although he's by far the most gifted rider around today.
flicker said:Alberto needed to cheat in 2010 to beat Lance in 2010. I speculate that his entire Astana team were charged.
Race Radio said:Armstrong was still using EPO in the 2000's
Race Radio said:Very few riders hit 60 and with Plasma expanders, drips, and advanced notice of testing it is easy to make 55 look like 49.5
Altitude said:Still some did (Pantani, Riis to name just a few) so you could take as much as you wanted before the 50% threshold. After the 50% rule you could not. So again, he could not take "all the drugs he wanted, whenever he wanted."
Race Radio said:No exactly. Riis' got his nickname of Mr. 60% from Virenque who figured to climb that fast he must be at 60%. The Festina riders were no allowed to be over 55% According to the Conconi Files Riis' HCT ranged from 41-56%.
Pantani had some High Hct's measured after a crash and a loss of blood but one of his most dominate performance was in the 99 Giro where the 50% level was in place. He only tested 52% on the next to last stage of the race.
Advanced notice of "Surprise" out of competition testing is huge. it opens up a wide variety of PED's that are great for building muscle and losing weight.
La Pandera said:Contador on a big wheel would've beaten the tarmac obsessed Armstrong of 2010. Armstrong spent more time kissing the pavement than ACF does kissing a certain rider's bootay.
Race Radio said:No exactly. Riis' got his nickname of Mr. 60% from Virenque who figured to climb that fast he must be at 60%. The Festina riders were no allowed to be over 55% According to the Conconi Files Riis' HCT ranged from 41-56%.
Pantani had some High Hct's measured after a crash and a loss of blood but one of his most dominate performance was in the 99 Giro where the 50% level was in place. He only tested 52% on the next to last stage of the race.
Advanced notice of "Surprise" out of competition testing is huge. it opens up a wide variety of PED's that are great for building muscle and losing weight.
WonderLance said:Obvously Lance would win. The dont put drungs into American beef.
and looking at what a prime piece he is only proves how he would kick contadoper.JMBeaushrimp said:Unless that cow's name is Armstrong...
Altitude said:Still some did (Pantani, Riis to name just a few) so you could take as much as you wanted before the 50% threshold. After the 50% rule you could not. So again, he could not take "all the drugs he wanted, whenever he wanted."
Altitude said:Pantani:
June 1994-- 58%
July 1994-- 57.4%
May 1995-- 57.6%
October 1995-- 60.1%
Difficult to imagine that Marco was the only one. Anyhow this is getting into a different discussion entirely.
Wallace said:...and NASA would never let anyone duct tape a bike to the shuttle (and I don't think any launches are scheduled for a while anyway), but theoretically, I feel quite strongly that the hypothesis is valid.