Pulling a Wiggins

Page 45 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
Dear Wiggo said:
Perfect. Linda Mcartney folded very early that year, and Wiggo's team is not listed on any of the results on cqranking.com

Very helpful.
Spencer Smith had massive quads tho. Like Tom Platz at Venice Muscle Beach but in a triathlon body, he could not find a pair of pants that fit his quads.

And it was good for Dave McKenzie to get on a omnivore diet, he was lacking in B-12. He specified at iTeam Nova, only omnivores need to apply.
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
Dear Wiggo said:
Perfect. Linda Mcartney folded very early that year, and Wiggo's team is not listed on any of the results on cqranking.com

Very helpful.

wiggins won fleche du sud that year.
 
Sep 29, 2012
12,197
0
0
sniper said:
wiggins won fleche du sud that year.

Looking at those race's entry lists, it appears he rode anything that allowed national teams. So I'm doubting the Rabo connection unless something else solid is revealed.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
the Inner Ring ‏@inrng 10h10 hours ago

Biggo: Wiggins at 80kg, added 8kg since Ponferrada as he works on explosive power for Paris-Roubaix, via @baxterophobe in L'Equipe

So first Wiggo lost weight to increase power, but now he has to gain weight to do the same :rolleyes:
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
Catwhoorg said:
Different types of power.
Sustained power/weight for climbing up mountains
Versus explosive shorter effort.


but I have a feeling you knew this.

what I find funny is that Wiggins can easily lose and gain weight depending on what he wants to do. Now he wants to win Roubaix, so what could be more natural than turning into Cancellara?
 
the sceptic said:
what I find funny is that Wiggins can easily lose and gain weight depending on what he wants to do. Now he wants to win Roubaix, so what could be more natural than turning into Cancellara?

I agree that its odd. He does seem to slim down (and bulk up if you can call any classics rider bulky) much easier than most folk. (even other pro riders)


I have my suspicions, shared here before, that he uses stimulants and/or cortisone OOC to slim down so fast. Not against the WADA code, but not what people expect from a 'clean team' either.

There is the caveat that I never truly trust any riders comments about their weight or power. So and so may say he has lost 10 pounds, when he has lost 4-5, its all part of the psychological games they play with each other.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
Catwhoorg said:
I agree that its odd. He does seem to slim down (and bulk up if you can call any classics rider bulky) much easier than most folk. (even other pro riders)


I have my suspicions, shared here before, that he uses stimulants and/or cortisone OOC to slim down so fast. Not against the WADA code, but not what people expect from a 'clean team' either.

There is the caveat that I never truly trust any riders comments about their weight or power. So and so may say he has lost 10 pounds, when he has lost 4-5, its all part of the psychological games they play with each other.
they are peptides. lipotropin for one.

then to reverse the weight loss, diet and roids. or cjc peptide
 
To me, Lipotropin would be implicitly (it is not explicitly) included under S2.5, but it wouldn't take much of a legal argument to make a case that it fell outside of some clumsy wording in that section.
 
Did he ?

He said he did, that's for sure (but see above caveat)

Could adjustments in his lactate threshold have pushed his TT'ing to a higher level, whilst his peak power was lower ? Would that have been enough to show the improved TTing at the longer distances ?

Sort of like the difference between a 5K runner and a marathon runner ?

I simply don't know.

I do think his technique and positioning was just a little more refined in 2012 than in 2008, but only marginally so, couple of watts at most.
 
Jul 5, 2009
2,440
4
0
Right. Adjusted his lactate threshold. Kind of like adjusting your saddle height. Easy stuff; only takes a few minutes.

Sorry, I couldn't help myself.

John Swanson
 
Dec 7, 2010
8,770
3
0
Catwhoorg said:
Did he ?

He said he did, that's for sure (but see above caveat)

Could adjustments in his lactate threshold have pushed his TT'ing to a higher level, whilst his peak power was lower ? Would that have been enough to show the improved TTing at the longer distances ?

Sort of like the difference between a 5K runner and a marathon runner ?

I simply don't know.

I do think his technique and positioning was just a little more refined in 2012 than in 2008, but only marginally so, couple of watts at most.

Its all in the marginal gains not the science.
 
ScienceIsCool said:
Right. Adjusted his lactate threshold. Kind of like adjusting your saddle height. Easy stuff; only takes a few minutes.

Sorry, I couldn't help myself.

John Swanson

Exactly.

Sometimes he adjusts it by losing weight. In a few minutes.

Sometimes he adjusts it by gaining weight. In a few minutes.

All this gain/lose weight crap sounds like Lance.

But, that field has already been plowed.

Dave.
 
Catwhoorg said:
I agree that its odd. He does seem to slim down (and bulk up if you can call any classics rider bulky) much easier than most folk. (even other pro riders)


I have my suspicions, shared here before, that he uses stimulants and/or cortisone OOC to slim down so fast. Not against the WADA code, but not what people expect from a 'clean team' either.

There is the caveat that I never truly trust any riders comments about their weight or power. So and so may say he has lost 10 pounds, when he has lost 4-5, its all part of the psychological games they play with each other.

Not against the WADA code means ok in some peoples eyes. In my view this is SKYs position. Whether you agree or not, they can claim to be clean within the letter of the law. Maybe not the spirit, but certainly the letter, which of course does open up a whole number of discussions - many of which are very much underway (or even concluded).
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
TheSpud said:
Not against the WADA code means ok in some peoples eyes. In my view this is SKYs position. Whether you agree or not, they can claim to be clean within the letter of the law. Maybe not the spirit, but certainly the letter, which of course does open up a whole number of discussions - many of which are very much underway (or even concluded).

Is EPO and AICAR within the WADA code as well Martin?
 
TheSpud said:
Not against the WADA code means ok in some peoples eyes. In my view this is SKYs position. Whether you agree or not, they can claim to be clean within the letter of the law. Maybe not the spirit, but certainly the letter, which of course does open up a whole number of discussions - many of which are very much underway (or even concluded).

It means okay to many at the highest levels of the sport. No controversy, please! Add the assistance of the UCI so a favored rider is never sanctioned, and you have the current state of cycling.
 

Latest posts