Pure climbers.

Page 2 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jun 10, 2009
478
119
9,480
1. Alberto Contador
2. Joaquin Rodriguez
3. Andy Schleck
4. Thibaut Pinot
5. Nairo Quintana
6. Domenico Pozzovivo
7. Igor Anton
8. Pierre Rolland
9. Jose Rujano
10. Mikel Nieve
 
Jan 27, 2012
15,230
2,614
28,180
Jakob747 said:
1. Alberto Contador
2. Joaquin Rodriguez
3. Andy Schleck
4. Thibaut Pinot
5. Nairo Quintana
6. Domenico Pozzovivo
7. Igor Anton
8. Pierre Rolland
9. Jose Rujano
10. Mikel Nieve

and we have take off.
 
Aug 23, 2012
1,114
1
0
Jakob747 said:
1. Alberto Contador
2. Joaquin Rodriguez
3. Andy Schleck
4. Thibaut Pinot
5. Nairo Quintana
6. Domenico Pozzovivo
7. Igor Anton
8. Pierre Rolland
9. Jose Rujano
10. Mikel Nieve

Nice list. Only one thing. IMO Antón is overrated. I think Pierre Rolland is far better and younger. How i can forget Nieve:eek::D
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
Jakob747 said:
1. Alberto Contador
2. Joaquin Rodriguez
3. Andy Schleck
4. Thibaut Pinot
5. Nairo Quintana
6. Domenico Pozzovivo
7. Igor Anton
8. Pierre Rolland
9. Jose Rujano
10. Mikel Nieve

pretty much this I guess
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
Dazed and Confused said:
He isn't, but his climbing skills are still better than most (all?) of the so called pure climbers currently active and relevant at the top level.

mother of god... people with so little sense of cycling should just not comment
 
Aug 23, 2012
1,114
1
0
I think the 2011 Giro D'Italia Rujano was the third best pure climber of the last five years only after Contador and Andy Schleck. In 2007 also Rasmussen was stronger IMO.
 
Mar 17, 2012
1,069
0
0
Libertine Seguros said:
Nah, Horner claimed to be the 2nd best climber in the world. Rujano claimed to be the 3rd best, naming Contador and Rodríguez as the top 2. At that point Rodríguez had only just moved from Caisse d'Epargne to Katyusha, so it was seen as crazy from that angle too.

Anyway, guys like Tiernan-Locke and Jelle Vanendert are a bit too classics-styled for me to think of as pure climbers, though I guess you could argue that that makes them little different to Purito.

Ah, yeah, Rujano also was there, saying funny staff.

Tiernan-Locke, I´m not so sure what type of rider he will become. I think apart from Route du Sud 2012, he probably never rode km-long mountains in any competition. At Murcia, he was even good in TT.
Will be very interesting to see what he can do in 2012. We know not much about him: how will he recover in 10- or 21 day long stage races? What about long climbs and TTs? Does he do well also in the heat?
Given what he showed in 2012, I could imagine and strongly hope he´ll be a factor in 2013.
One race should fit him perfectly, that´s, of course... Fleche Wallonne.
He´s in the right hands at Sky, they´ll build him up slowly, knowing he´s still fresh for a 1984 born rider, though probably lacks tactical skills.
I think they won´t demand 100 race days from him, given he certainly never had more than max. 40-60 a year all career long.
Would like to see him shine right from the start, at TDU´s Willunga Hill, but expect him to rather kick off in Oman or Algarve, dependent on where Sky will be st the start line.
 
Mar 10, 2009
9,245
23
17,530
RHRH19861986 said:
If you define "pure climber" as someone who can´t sprint, can´t TT, can´t win a race like Roubaix, then I´d change most names you named. Quintana, Rujano and Pozzovivo can stay.

To add just a few:
Nieve
Santambrogio
Zaugg
Szmyd
Jelle Vanendert

All GC guys have to be good in climbing and TT, and in the important stage races, if they recover properly and keep their HCTs up, good climbers suddenly also show good TTs, remember 55-Kilo-Pantani.

Igor Anton should be in that list too.
 
Mar 10, 2009
9,245
23
17,530
HiCadence said:
1. Locke
2. Wiggins
3. Froome
4. Zubeldia
5. Horner
6. Valverde
7. moncoutie
8. Visconti
9. Contador
10. Gesink

You have to be kidding! (the riders in bold)

....and how is Visconti in this list????
 
Mar 10, 2009
9,245
23
17,530
RHRH19861986 said:
Who claimed he was the best climber in the world behind Contador and Rodrigue? Wasn´t it Horner?


Actually Horner said behind Contador and Andy Schleck.

Rujano said he was the 3rd best behind Contador and Purito.
 
Mar 10, 2009
9,245
23
17,530
shades1 said:
in recent years contador and schleck are a mile in front of all these young pretenders and if AS can recover fully from his injury there is still plenty more to come , not that many on this forum will agree as its just a contador love forum and pretty much hatred for schleck .

Andy gets his respect here equal to what he deserves for the most part. You seem to be about a year behind in measuring the pulse of this forum.
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
Jason_Mercier said:
I think the 2011 Giro D'Italia Rujano was the third best pure climber of the last five years only after Contador and Andy Schleck. In 2007 also Rasmussen was stronger IMO.

the 2009 rujano was the best climber I've seen since pantani. in 2011 he was getting better and better until he got sick. but on grossglockner he was already stronger than contador imo. I will never forget etna, rujano realized there that he was even stronger than contador, before that he always thought contador was the best climber in the world.

still for rujano to shine everything must fall in place. especially the weather. he is so vulnerable wth his 48 kg
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
Dazed and Confused said:
well, let us know when you start with the intelligent bits.

it would be pointless to tell you, as you couldn't see intelligence if it was personified in a naked girl dancing on a wide open field, holding a board with "intelligence" on it