Race Design Thread

Page 354 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Feb 20, 2010
33,224
15,730
28,180
Stage 20: Segovia - Colmenar Viejo, 208km

ek1Fho5m_o.png


xSgHpThw_o.png


GPM:
Puerto de Navacerrada (cat.1) 13,6km @ 4,9%
Alto de Abantos (cat.1) 11,5km @ 5,4%
Alto de Robledondo (cat.3) 4,3km @ 5,5%
Puerto de Navacerrada (cat.1) 18,4km @ 5,3%
Puerto de la Morcuera (cat.1) 11,5km @ 5,5%
Alto del Cerro Peñote (cat.3) 2,7km @ 6,9%

A final mountain stage in true 2000s fashion: the Sierra de Guadarrama was almost invariably the site of final mountains in the era (2006 the sole exception, which had flat stages and an ITT after La Pandera in week 3), often including Abantos which appeared several times during the decade. I’ve added a little twist, but this is otherwise somewhat along the lines of what we would frequently see in the era, such as 2005 and 2009’s stages to La Granja de San Ildefonso, or 2004’s Navacerrada MTF after a sequence of similar climbs. Admittedly this type of descent finish may have more to do with the rash of 80s and 90s finishes at the Destilerías DYC distillery in Palazuelos de Eresma when they were sponsoring the race, but those La Granja finishes and the Collado Villalba descent finish on the antepenultimate stage in 2003 (they had an Abantos MTT on stage 20 that year, uncharacteristically for the time not finishing with an ITT in Madrid) show that this format was still living on through the 2000s.

adobestock-301489895-1500x999.jpeg


The stage starts in the historic city of Segovia, so we will get those iconic shots of its aqueduct and actually cross over yesterday’s stage, which passed south of here. We do see a bit of overlapping of stages around the Sierra de Guadarrama throughout the 90s and 2000s in the Vuelta, so I don’t see too much trouble with this. Segovia hosted the Vuelta twice in the 2000s, a stage start mid-race in 2002, and the late-race intermediate stage I referenced during the last write-up in 2008, which reprised the circuit from the national championships of 1995. That 2008 stage I remember well - Caisse d’Épargne were monitoring the break with David Arroyo for the express and stated purpose that he was there to tank the break for Valverde to go for a stage win behind. Except they hadn’t banked on how strong Vasil Kiryienka was, and the Tinkoff Credit Systems man (back when that was a ProConti team rather than when Tinkoff took over as sponsor of the old CSC/Saxo Bank team) dropped his break mates and kept a lead over everybody - bar Arroyo, who hadn’t done a single turn. Arroyo then took advantage to take the stage win at the line to disappointment from the crowd and commentators. Unzué went to apologise to Kiryienka… and offer him a contract.

2008 Segovia stage

Climbing starts early, as we head through La Granja (which hosted a couple of downhill finishes in the era) and ascend the northern face of the Vuelta classic that is the Puerto de Navacerrada. This is the shorter side - essentially divided into a false flat half and a steeper - 7-8% mainly - half. It’s, like much of these Sierra de Guadarrama ascents, kind of a generous cat.1 but difficult for a cat.2; these are often elevated to cat.1 for historic reasons more than to say that they are equivalent in difficulty to some of the climbs from earlier in the race that were also given that rating - certainly I wouldn’t say Navacerrada north matches up to, say, Peyresourde east, Fumanyà north or Portichuelo de Cástaras, but it’s tougher than most of the cat.2 ascents we’ve used. It is however here an early stage climb that won’t impact the stage results other than by selecting who will be in the breakaway for the day.

After descending into Navacerrada itself, we head southward through Guadarrama to the town of El Escorial, which sits below the more famous San Lorenzo de El Escorial. We could have gone straight to San Lorenzo, but that would be no fun. After all, we all know of the great murito in the great monastic city, but while the road has since fallen into disrepair that makes it an unlikely race host without a bit of time and money being invested into to its tarmac, the city is also the base of the Alto de Abantos, which hasn’t been seen in pro racing since 2007 but during the early 2000s was an absolute staple and was an essential inclusion for me as a result. Abantos itself is not the most frightening climb you’ll ever see - it’s only just a cat.1 in all honesty, 11,5km at 5,4% although that’s with a short flat and descent in the middle. But like a lot of the climbs in the Sierra de Guadarrama, it gets over-categorised due to its usual race-ending prominence.

Abantos1.gif


Abantos was first introduced to the Vuelta in the 1980s, usually as a mid-stage climb linked to El León by the Collado de la Mina, a cat.2 climb which is no longer suitable for passage by road bike. 1989 and 1990 saw identical stages over Morcuera, Cotos, Abantos, Mina and Navacerrada to finish at the DYC distillery in Palazuelos, for example. The loss of La Mina meant that the climb sat out until 1999, and from then on it could only be used as either a mountaintop finish, or via a multi-stepped descent via a couple of either uncategorised or cat.3 climbs back toward San Lorenzo de El Escorial. The race got its money’s worth out of the climb, however, with a 1999 mountaintop finish (won by Roberto Laiseka), a 2000 functionally Unipuerto stage (won by race leader Roberto Heras in a two-up sprint against Gilberto Simoni), and then in 2001 introducing the same sequence of downhill that I use here, as they went for a double climb (misleading profile) of Abantos, won by Simoni in a two-up against José María Jiménez (the very last time Chava would be seen in his playgrounds of the mountains). 2003 was the climb’s most iconic moment, however, as it was seen on stage 20, with a mountain time trial. ONCE’s Isidro Nozal had been grinding his way up the motley collection of 4-5% climbs of that edition, merrily dodging both his opposition and the shower along the way. The first cracks in his armour came on stage 19 when Roberto Heras gained over a minute, but Nozal had almost 2 minutes ahead of the cronoescalada… whereupon he completely choked, melting down and losing all of his advantage and more on this otherwise rather unthreatening ascent. Heras would pull on the maillot oro for the first time on the final parade. In 2004, it would be a mid-stage climb on a transitional stage, and then in 2007 it would see its final inclusion, as a mountaintop finish won by Samuel Sánchez, ahead of Dani Moreno, Carlos Sastre and the race leader - and eventual winner - Denis Menchov. After that, Abantos went out of vogue, and the road rapidly deteriorated due to weathering, which has rendered it off-limits for many years. A Vuelta focusing on the 2000s needs to include it, though, so here it is.

We return to El Escorial via the uncategorised ascent into San Martín de la Alameda and then the cat.3 climb to Robledondo. We don’t cross over or retrace our steps from earlier, but we do head for an intermediate sprint in Collado Villalba, which hosted stages of the Vuelta in 2002, 2003, 2004 and the race’s penultimate-day ITT in 2007. And then it’s on to the always-classic Puerto de Navacerrada, pretty much an ever-present from when Unipublic acquired the race until the early 2010s where the preference for a long transfer to have final mountains somewhere other than the Sistema Central meant these climbs around Madrid fell from prominence. It has still had its moments - the 2015 Cercedilla stage springs to mind - but it has been used more in recent years for its being the greater part of the ascent to the Bola del Mundo summit.

Navacerrada.gif


Puerto_de_Navacerrada_14-10-2006.jpg


There’s still 68km to go at the summit here, but if anybody is going to dare on this stage, this would be when to go for it, unless there are smaller-than-expected gaps in the GC. That last 8km at over 7% are our last real sustained uphill threats at difficult gradients, and the fact we are descending via the Puerto de Cotos (retracing backward our steps from stage 19) means that there’s a plateau to deal with rather than immediate respite at the summit. This also means that the descent is slightly less trodden than the north face that we climbed at the start of the stage - but should still be familiar to many. We then climb the - easier - northern face of the Puerto de la Morcuera. The southern side is actually one of the better climbs in this mountain range, but unfortunately only links to Navafría - which doesn’t have a logical stage host at the summit or at the end of its descent - or Cotos, which is one of the least threatening climbs in the area. This is the single most generous cat.1 climb in the race - statistically it actually looks slightly harder than Abantos, but this is much more consistent and does not have that notable kilometre at 10%+ partway through. It is, however, only 31km from the line, and with its hardest gradients at the bottom, so there’s that.

MorcueraRascafria.gif


The descent from Morcuera sees us into a final intermediate sprint just 14km from the line in Soto del Real, and then we have a little sting in the tail that I discovered via 39x28 Altimetrias, a site which usually doesn’t play in this kind of mountain range, preferring to map España Verde, in particular Asturias - and often doesn’t pay much mind to whether a climb is reasonably achievable for a road bike either, so can sometimes be misleading. However, the site did make me aware of this small but potentially interesting obstacle - to date unused by the Vuelta (I can’t find it in the annals of the Vuelta a la Comunidad de Madrid, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it hasn’t been seen as records that I can find are incomplete, and in some cases it may have been uncategorised as well). 2,7km @ 6,9% doesn’t sound very threatening, but the last 1700m are at over 8%, which could make it a good option for stage hunting if the GC guys aren’t bothered too much (definitely a possibility) or to make gaps from small groups if they have decided to make it active. Their proposed stage uses the same combination as the second half of my stage, but frankly unless you went over Navafría then Morcuera, or just offered a much less challenging climb from a mountain perspective (if you wanted a hilly-to-medium-mountain Worlds prep type stage, for example, you could go La Trampa-Bustarviejo-Cerro Peñote, or for a medium mountain type stage you could do a loop from Soto, with Morcuera sur and Canencia before this same finish. The hill on which this summit lies was used as part of the loop between the two passes of Morcuera in the 2015 stage, but not from the side used here.

And then, it’s just a descent into Colmenar Viejo, a city of just under 50.000 inhabitants in the north of Comunidad de Madrid, which strangely enough was never a Vuelta host until 2019; it did, however, in the late 2000s and early 2010s, feature heavily in the Vuelta a Madrid, with the likes of Javier Moreno and Ángel Vicioso winning in the city, and also featuring as a start for stages to Puerto de la Morcuera during the era when that was the race’s main MTF, with Giovanny Báez winning there, along with a couple of hilarious sputnik performances, such as 2012 when Sergey Firsanov - pre-Rusvelo but still 29 years old - somehow lost no time on the climb despite being in the break of the day to Nairo Quintana, Mikel Landa and the most heavily charged José Belda that we ever saw - and trust me, José Belda in 2012 was a sight to behold as this 37-year-old amateur just went full Alarcón in the amateur scene - to win the GC by two minutes. Its only Vuelta appearance is the 2019 Becerril stage where they tried to recapture 2015’s lightning in a bottle to predictably disappointing effect. This is however the last chance for any decisive climbing so we shall see how things go.

Colmenar-Viejo-1024x683.png
 
Feb 20, 2010
33,224
15,730
28,180
Stage 21: Parque Warner - Madrid, 41,2km (CRI)

K89KNyZa_o.png


MX4aOKgD_o.png


In true 2000s fashion, we’re finishing with a contrarreloj, which means, yes, there’s a solid chance of the lead changing on the very last day of the race. While conventional wisdom has seen the ‘race of truth’ increasingly marginalised in La Vuelta - just as everywhere else - and final day parade stages have become the norm in all three GTs, as recently as the mid 2000s it was not unusual for only one of the three - the Tour, naturally - to feature such a stage, with both the Giro and Vuelta preferring a final day ITT more often than not. While this has very much become a rarity now, typically only featuring on those occasional editions finishing away from Madrid (Santiago de Compostela in 2014, for example), from 2000 to 2004, the only time the Vuelta did not finish against the clock was 2003, and that was because the previous day had been an MTT. And not only that, but twice among those four final day time trials - a 50% record - the overall race lead would change hands on that final day.

The two occasions when the race leader safely negotiated the final day both saw Roberto Heras coming into the final day in gold. In 2000 he came into the final stage with four and a half minutes’ advantage over Ángel Casero and, while Casero came just 6” shy of Santos González’ stage-winning time in the final 38km test against the clock, that advantage was far too large to overcome. A near-identical 38km route would be seen again the following year, with Santiago Botero taking the stage win. Of much more importance to most in attendance, however, was the narrow lead held by Óscar Sevilla over the stronger time triallist Casero; with just 26” to overcome, Casero was the overwhelming favourite to take the race win, much as Nairo Quintana came into the final day time trial against Tom Dumoulin in the 2017 Giro with every expectation from fans and pundits alike that the Dutchman would be the favourite to take the victory; and this time the Festina man delivered. 2002’s race saw a 41,2km final stage time trial from the Warner Brothers theme park to the south of the city to a finish at the Santiago Bernabéu stadium (yes, that distance and route may seem familiar) with Roberto Heras leading by just over a minute - but crucially that lead was over TERMINAITOR©, a destructive diesel-fuelled Aitor González who would rumble through the stage at such a pace that, let alone Heras, nobody at all, not even the remaining time trial specialists, could get within a minute of him and his eventual GC victory margin would be over two minutes despite having not worn the golden jersey at all during the race, marking the second year in a row that the race winner would not actually wear the jersey during the race. Kelme’s success came at a price, however, as Sevilla would fall off the podium in an echo of the previous year’s heartbreak, being relegated to 4th by Joseba Beloki.

As mentioned, the following year saw a sprint in Madrid due to the penultimate day’s mountain time trial - so Heras at least got to wear the jersey for a day en route to victory - before the final day time trial came back the following year, a shorter affair this time, 28km which served as a dress rehearsal for Madrid’s 2005 World Championships route, with a lap of the planned circuit in the Casa del Campo before returning to the city centre and finishing with the closing stretches of the tri-star circuit taking in the Paseo del Prado that we have now grown accustomed to. Heras, as in 2000 and 2002, was coming in with the lead, and like Sevilla in 2001 it was only a slender one too - a mere 43 seconds separated him from the revelation of the race, Santiago Pérez, on red-hot form (after 11 stages he had been over 4 minutes down and outside the top 10, and he’d not got any of the time gained back from breakaways either) and producing some of the most Riccardo Riccò climbing you will ever see (before even Riccò himself had the chance to). Not a noted time triallist, Pérez somehow won the stage as the top end of the stage results were all GC favourites; Heras finished 4th - ahead of the likes of Bert Grabsch and Victor Hugo Peña even - to keep his losses to just 13” and defend his title. And then, of course, Pérez would test positive and serve two years on the shelf - possibly the biggest reason why the race-ending chrono went the way of the dodo.

From that point on, we would see a more standard sprint finish finale in Madrid. At first we would have a Madrid to Madrid stage, which would head out to the suburbs before returning to the city. 2005’s stage finished with two laps of a 17,3km circuit but closing such a long circuit proved troublesome and in 2006 we saw the now-familiar tricorn circuit finishing on the Paseo del Prado introduced for the first time.

EXpXpAoWkAAMQ4l.jpeg


Set in green land outside the commuter town of San Martín de la Vega, Parque Warner was opened in 2002 to great fanfare (hence wanting to host the 2002 Vuelta, which saw a rather dull 20th stage finish there and then the start of the stage 21 ITT) as Warner Bros. Movie World Madrid / Warner Bros. Park Madrid and was managed by American theme park conglomerate Six Flags for the first two years of its existence, before being renamed Parque Warner Madrid in 2006 following the end of that arrangement after Six Flags sold off its European commitments. This course is a faithful reproduction of that 2002 Vuelta race-ending ITT in order to both meet my commitment to a 2000s-era Vuelta and also as this is very specifically 2000s as a location, due to its opening at that point to fanfare - similar to the Eurotunnel stages in the 1994 Tour de France, and also following Spain’s adoption of the fad of the 90s in the Tour de France for stage hosts at theme parks, with Futuroscope (1990 and 2000) and Le Puy du Fou (1993 and 1999) in particular being notable. Salou’s Port Aventura would also host the Vuelta in 2001, so while the fad was less pronounced in Spain, it was nevertheless still present.

After looping around the theme park complex, it’s a fairly straight south-to-north power test that takes us into the centre of Madrid. The profile makes it look like there are some slopes, but they are realistically not more than false flat; it’s by and large a slight uphill (the finish is 140m higher in altitude than the start, and there is a slight drop after leaving the park into San Martín de la Vega, but this is only 200m altitude gain in 30km, not even averaging 1%) so this will be a pretty pure power test. The one thing that’s unusual for a Vuelta of today is that we pass what has become the Vuelta’s traditional finishing spot at 37,4km and still continue for another 4km or just under up the heart of the city to finish at Real Madrid’s Santiago Bernabéu stadium. This is because this was where the 2002 stage finished (also with the Cáceres TT being under 30km, we ought to be at over 40km for balance), and also that was also at the heart of the 2005 Madrid World Championships course. It’s a slight variation on a theme, but it’s perfectly reasonable as a finish location. It was used in the 2000s era that I’m trying to ape, and so it’s a perfect place to finish my race.

Santiago-bernabeu.jpg


I have tried to keep loyal to the spirit of the era - that era allowed big turbo diesels like Casero and Aitor González to win the race, but was still the era when Roberto Heras took his record-breaking number of wins. There was plenty of innovation but also sops to tradition; for me looking at this from 15-25 years down the line, some of the “traditional” hosts are the ones that were established as regulars in the Vuelta in the 2000s, and some of the innovation has come in to racing since this era ended. I have already put a lot of the era’s most iconic mountaintop finishes off limits, but I feel I was able to encapsulate a lot of the characteristics of the era even without them - and was able to keep the non-MTF stages varied and suited to the era, bringing in iconic stage finishes like Córdoba after Trassierra and the cobbled uphills of Cuenca and Ávila which were staples of Spanish cycling in the 2000s but much rarer today, and giving final mountain stages through the Sierra de Guadarrama as the final chance for the climbers, which is now pretty atypical with longer transfers from final mountains being de rigueur. I gave two decent length ITTs while not having them be long enough that they remove the pure climbers from contention, and finished on an ITT so that the final weekend can offer chances to be decisive on both days, in a way that has only been the case in the Vuelta on rare occasions since 2005 (notably being the case in the two editions that finished in Galicia, when no parade stage was included). Whether a route like this would work in modern cycling I don’t know, but it’s a throwback design that showcases a bit more of what the Vuelta used to be about than what it currently is.

Maybe one day I’ll do a 70s-style one with those weird medium mountain routes and ending with a bunch of looping around the Basque Country. That was usually good for some exciting finishes.
 
Apr 30, 2011
48,941
31,571
28,180
After descending into Navacerrada itself, we head southward through Guadarrama to the town of El Escorial, which sits below the more famous San Lorenzo de El Escorial. We could have gone straight to San Lorenzo, but that would be no fun. After all, we all know of the great murito in the great monastic city, but while the road has since fallen into disrepair that makes it an unlikely race host without a bit of time and money being invested into to its tarmac,
huh

wasnt that murito part of the circuit in the 23 vuelta ?
 
Apr 13, 2026
48
28
130
Tdf- needs to keep last years finish, the usual champs fayre is very dull.
Vuelta - as many big mountains as possible.
Giro - finestre every year, or other slightly sketchy gravel/snowy/dodgy climbs.