Netserk said:You bolded that yourself in the quote in your very first post.
ok, now it makes sense. but as normal race radio I meant just the one on the team cars
ok, that could be ok. rider's radios to listen to official race radio.
Netserk said:You bolded that yourself in the quote in your very first post.
LaFlorecita said:I agree pastro. I guess the races would be more unpredictable but not in a good way. But hopefully Vaughters is right and radios will still be allowed in 2015.
I think we've seen plenty of good racing with radios. I am with you pastro, I wouldn't want to see one of my favorites lose out because he couldn't communicate with teammates.
LaFlorecita said:I agree pastro. I guess the races would be more unpredictable but not in a good way. But hopefully Vaughters is right and radios will still be allowed in 2015.
It's simple, they should re-learn how to race without team radios. Race radio and logistics should take care of most safety issues. I really hope this ban goes through.pastronef said:I am thinking about carrefour de l'arbre, Wiggo with a flat and Thomas in the break with no radio. I'D GET MAD, MAD
pastronef said:I guess that will stay as always.
ps. about entertainment: your favourire rider is chasing a breakaway with a teammate in it. they have 30 seconds time gap. he crashes or has a flat. team car without team radio can't stop the teammate up front to wait for your favourite rider. he loses the race or time in GC.
grrrrrr
Zinoviev Letter said:There is always an element of randomness to bike racing. But just as with crashes, even the apparently random elements are actually an interaction between luck on the one hand and skill or intelligence on the other. Being more likely to know what the hell was going on without radios was an advantage for smart riders and alert riders. Being more likely to respond wisely to a changing situation without a DS pouring the necessary tactical instruction into their ear was an even bigger one.
Radios take a lot of that out of the hands of the riders. They reduce the importance of racing intelligence as a factor. The main reason why team radios are bad is that they allow teams to make races more controlled and orderly and thus less entertaining. But they also reward the stupid and oblivious rider.
Zinoviev Letter said:Radios take a lot of that out of the hands of the riders. They reduce the importance of racing intelligence as a factor. The main reason why team radios are bad is that they allow teams to make races more controlled and orderly and thus less entertaining. But they also reward the stupid and oblivious rider.
RedheadDane said:I don't think it can be boiled down to a case of radios make the riders mindlessly follow their DSes orders vs. without radios the safety will be gone.
The riders are able to think for themselves even with radios - the crosswind racing of Saxo in last years TdF was done without any directing from the car - and sometimes too much radio contact can also be an issue; Stelviogate anyone?
Maybe a solution would be having the official radio delay general information to the team cars who'd then have to pass it on to the riders. However, in situations where the message needs to be given to the riders now without the added time of having riders from each team get to the cars, the message could be sent directly to the riders, maybe just a few respected riders.
This might also help avoid a situation in which a rider goes "All this talking in my ear is really annoying!" *removes radio*.
cyclingPRpro said:Sorry, but radios are coming back. If you want "purity" go ride L'Eroica.
The DS is the director of the team, period. I understand you guys don't care about logistics... but if that stuff didn't happen your favorite rider likely wouldn't even finish the stage. It's a hell of a lot easier to radio back and let the wrench know you're coming so he or she can be prepared, especially if you're unlucky enough to pull car 18.
Far better to shake things up would be to disallow power meters. IMO, too many riders lock in on a number like a RONCO oven then set it and forget it... That makes for boring racing.
They must! Besides race radio can be complemented by technology and motorbikes.Jancouver said:The team radios on the other hand must go. Race radios will provide all the important info including the race number of a rider with mechanical so the team can wait end help.
<golf clap>cyclingPRpro said:Sorry, but radios are coming back. If you want "purity" go ride L'Eroica.
Yawn. So how was anyone actually capable of winning, or finishing, or doing anything before race radios?cyclingPRpro said:The DS is the director of the team, period. I understand you guys don't care about logistics... but if that stuff didn't happen your favorite rider likely wouldn't even finish the stage.
Yeah, well it's not likely that anyone here would disagree with that. But I'm confused by the fact that that's a direct contradiction of this:cyclingPRpro said:Far better to shake things up would be to disallow power meters. IMO, too many riders lock in on a number like a RONCO oven then set it and forget it... That makes for boring racing.
cyclingPRpro said:ban all carbon, all new fabrics and use only water.
As technology advances so should the sport.
Jancouver said:... Race radios will provide all the important info including the race number of a rider with mechanical so the team can wait end help.
Dazed and Confused said:no the crosswind stage was far more planned than you think.
At the breakfast meeting before the stage started two teams decided to ride hard. Can you guess the name of these two teams?
(clue: none of them involved saxo)
RedheadDane said:And yet it was Saxo who started the crosswind racing...
We are talking about the same stage, right? Stage 13 of the 2013 TdF.
cyclingPRpro said:Sorry, but radios are coming back. If you want "purity" go ride L'Eroica.
The DS is the director of the team, period. I understand you guys don't care about logistics... but if that stuff didn't happen your favorite rider likely wouldn't even finish the stage. It's a hell of a lot easier to radio back and let the wrench know you're coming so he or she can be prepared, especially if you're unlucky enough to pull car 18.
pastronef said:Luuc Eisenga @EisengaL
There still will be use of 2-way radios in bike races in 2015, same conditions as in 2014; cfm'ed by @UCI_cycling.
https://twitter.com/EisengaL/status/549332017717190656
jens_attacks said:at least until the imminent introduction of drones in the races, there will be race radios. i confirm
LaFlorecita said:No, Saxo did not start the echelon racing.
OPQS and Belkin were riding hard from the start of the stage. Which is why for example Valverde fell behind. Then Saxo forced the final (and most important) selection.
I was terribly annoyed by the Dutch media, who only mentioned Belkin when it came to that stage. Belkin, Belkin, Belkin. It was mainly Saxo who made it an awesome stage. But they did not start it all.
Viskovitz said:You must be a hell of a good rider because you never ride anything outside the WT races, do you? There you don't have radios and NOBODY ****ing cares. You don't complain, managers don't complain... Wanna know why? Managers don't care if they lose a small race because of idiotic riders and tactics, but they want the big goals, the WT races, strictly under their boring control.
cyclingPRpro said:It's pretty obvious you guys are only looking at this from a fan perspective and have never worked in the sport at the pro level.
Radios are needed for many reasons. Rider safety, logistics (feeding - flats - mechanicals - injury/illness) and yes tactics. But if we all have radios and use them it's a level playing field.