Well, i would still have given Mathieu the edge, considering he is better at technical sections, eventhough i think van Aert was equally good (physically). But i don't agree with Adrie, who said Mathieu had the situation perfectly under control, considering what happened at Namur/Gavere. You can't say everything is under control when you lead 5 or 6 seconds.
Let's just say it evens things out a bit for a few seasons ago, when van Aert lost a bundle of races, due to mechanical issues (especially chain issues) i think in 2017.
Wout said he started with too low tire pressure in the first few laps and that was the main reason why he couldn't keep up, he had trouble taking corners and drifting etc. That means he also had to change bikes a few times and lost seconds each time, while Mathieu didn't.
Difference with the other guys, like in the good old days, is huge.
Fully agree. And based upon VdPoels reaction in the post-race interview Adrie was wrong. But he is his dad, he is allowed to give his son an edge.