I can see why the Giro would toss Lance and the shack. The Giro is not a race for the Shack B squad. BMC is going so I would think that George will miss the ToC
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
flicker said:I do not understand this thread. Il Giro is an Italian race. Your team rides the race to win. It is a very hard and takes great preparation.
The riders riding the Giro must attain great form after an aradous preparation period. Please, please respect the Giro.
The Radio Shack team will not ride the Giro because their focus is upon other cycling competions.
bianchigirl said:One last question - what exactly was the point of going all out for the PT licence, which guarantees invites to the top tier races - if you're not going to ride them?
richwagmn said:I have to agree. Makes more sense for them (and their sponsors) to ride in the ToC than the Giro.
Not sure what all the fuss is about.
theswordsman said:The fuss is because pro teams have a minimum of 23 riders so they can ride more than one race at once. Pretty much every team that has the option of riding both the Giro and the Tour of California will split their leaders and try to do well at both. The Giro d'Italia is a much more prestigious race. The TOC doesn't even offer UCI points - something a team ranked 24 out of 26 might consider important. Also, grand tours are a way for younger riders to improve their fitness level for the future, and even completing one is a plus for the palmares. So the shack is sacrificing the development and careers of some of their riders so that guys at the end of their careers can try to win a one week race?
I started the thread initially because RS declared themselves to be a Dream Team - pretty much the same squad that the press said was unstoppable last year plus some strong additions, but when the rubber hit the road, they declared themselves not strong enough to do two races at once. They dissed the Giro. They weren't invited to Tirreno-Adriatico, and they're setting the stage to be a massive failure established...well, never mind. If they don't win California, and they don't do well at the Tour after skipping the Giro, they're pretty much a joke.
janraaskalt said:Besides the TDU and the ToC, does anyone know Radioshack's race schedule? Couldn't find one on their website :-(
*G*K*S* said:The opposite of Contador's until the TdF?
Hibbles said:As the Toto turns is, yet again, quality:
http://velocitynation.com/content/toto/2010/toto-turns-175
Lies! Nothing but lies!
python said:+1.
id only add - there is a fair bit of the obvious personal agenda in dissing the giro - old 'dont cross me or else'. not only it looks odd and unprofessional, it is laughable. coming from a team and a rider who haven't delivered any goods yet.
python said:+1.
id only add - there is a fair bit of the obvious personal agenda in dissing the giro - old 'dont cross me or else'. not only it looks odd and unprofessional, it is laughable. coming from a team and a rider who haven't delivered any goods yet.
theswordsman said:The fuss is because pro teams have a minimum of 23 riders so they can ride more than one race at once. Pretty much every team that has the option of riding both the Giro and the Tour of California will split their leaders and try to do well at both. The Giro d'Italia is a much more prestigious race. The TOC doesn't even offer UCI points - something a team ranked 24 out of 26 might consider important. Also, grand tours are a way for younger riders to improve their fitness level for the future, and even completing one is a plus for the palmares. So the shack is sacrificing the development and careers of some of their riders so that guys at the end of their careers can try to win a one week race?
I started the thread initially because RS declared themselves to be a Dream Team - pretty much the same squad that the press said was unstoppable last year plus some strong additions, but when the rubber hit the road, they declared themselves not strong enough to do two races at once. They dissed the Giro. They weren't invited to Tirreno-Adriatico, and they're setting the stage to be a massive failure established...well, never mind. If they don't win California, and they don't do well at the Tour after skipping the Giro, they're pretty much a joke.
I'll bet the start money Lance is getting pays for a tenth of his season. The guy is going around cashing checks and collecting gift bags. He should have married Sandra Bullock it would have been even better for his bottom line.The guy is a human cash registerbianchigirl said:I've just remembered another great reason for choosing Amgen ToC over the dull old Giro - the freebies and the lack of serious drug testing
fatandfast said:I'll bet the start money Lance is getting pays for a tenth of his season. The guy is going around cashing checks and collecting gift bags. He should have married Sandra Bullock it would have been even better for his bottom line.The guy is a human cash register
Hibbles said:As the Toto turns is, yet again, quality:
http://velocitynation.com/content/toto/2010/toto-turns-175
Lies! Nothing but lies!
bianchigirl said:I've just remembered another great reason for choosing Amgen ToC over the dull old Giro - the freebies and the lack of serious drug testing
Plus the guarantee by race officials that Leipheimer will be given the win regardless of what happensbianchigirl said:I've just remembered another great reason for choosing Amgen ToC over the dull old Giro - the freebies and the lack of serious drug testing
Hibbles said:I prefer "cycling prostitute".