Re: Re:
oncehadhair said:
It's all part of the game at PR. The best riders usually spend quite a lot of energy making sure they are as close to the front as possible throughout the race.
That's what makes Hayman's win so good. He was at the front the whole race and making the pace. Those expressing disappointment that the favourites did not win need to ask them why they didn't ride to win - by staying at the front and out of trouble.[/quote]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is impossible to be always at the front in a race like this, what, well, I agree. and if I put an 8 is becouse it was a great race, but I can rate more for that.
I understand that if somebody is not at the front, maybe becouse they dont have the better possible teams, and becouse Arenberg was close, and the next step was to be at the very front, they payed that, well...Acording to Sagan, he was involved in both crashes, so it is not a question to be at the front, but bad luck. As I said, Ettixx should be doing what thet were doing before, to be at the front, but not to pull in an stronger way. Doing that Cancellara and Sagan get a dissdvantage, but a fair dissadvantage, If you attack that way becoue you have very good teams, as Etixx or SKY, well, you can, but I am not going to praise your race the same way.
If Sagan consider that he and Cancellara lost the race by bad luck, it is the same that to ssay that others got good luck, and I can put of course the perfection, that is a 10, or close to the perfection, a 9,...becouse it was a result very influenced by luck.. no more.
Of course Hayman has no blame of that and hi victory is meritable, deserved and there is nothing to say on that.