• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Rate the 2014 Tour De France!

Page 6 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

Rate the 2014 Tour De France!

  • 1 (Crap)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Apr 15, 2013
954
0
0
Visit site
I gave it an 8, had the Risoul stage started at St Jean de Maurienne with Galibier than Izoard and Risoul, I would have given it a 9, because as others say, what is missing is one epic stage.

But than again I understand the organisers' fear that that one epic stage blocks the rides which end up waiting for it. Same rationale for a weakish Hautacam stage.
 
Jun 28, 2012
798
0
0
Visit site
Given the same start and end towns for each stage (although I neutralized about 10 km out of Grenoble to get that stage below 240), I altered four stages for content (and a few others to get under the 3500 km distance, although I don't count those in this), therefore, with a point off for each stage, I gave it a six.
 
gregrowlerson said:
8. Very good, though could do with some more ITT. Stages 8 & 10 look excellent, and finishing climbs in high mountains are not overused ones.

I don't like the idea of one TT. I think it's okay but it's also more noticeable now that they are cutting the length of stages also. Probably not such a bad thing. Virenque like breakaways over entire mountain ranges on long stages are history. Also a good thing even if it was entertaining to watch.
 
Mar 13, 2009
2,890
0
0
Visit site
Woah, this is a rant.

I like cobbles being included, but I always think they should play a part in the race beyond who crashes and who doesn't. Even include 2 cobbled stages of a distance and difficulty that will create gaps even if no one crashes. I think to reduce crashes placing them in the final week would be better. Worth a shot or must we see high mountains and a TT decide things in the final week?
A tour from a GC excitement standpoint for me is determined by how easy to knock off the favourite it is. Which is really hard if the favourite is the best climber and flat TTer. Far easier if you are pitting Schleck vs Evans than Froome vs Quintana. Froome is only vulnerable on the flat once isolated from his team, cobbles are an unknown, downhill I've not seen anything to show he's particularly vulnerable. 5 uphill finishes definitely fall in Froome's favour. Long flat ITT definitely falls in his favour.
IMHO if want to beat Froome, beat Sky in the hills and Froome on the flat. Even queen stages up and down all day can fall into his favour, as with a little patience Froome and Sky may lose the leaders on a climb. Then they can regroup drive hard to the next climb and then Froome can use the climb to bridge the gap, same same with a MTF. IMHO the best stages to beat Sky would be ridiculous hard starts and long flat finishes. These don't exist this tour. With 5 uphill finishes and a long TT I'd say the next best rider needs to find minimum 5 minutes over Froome to win. For surprise sake, best to do it one hit.

Stages 10, 14, 17, and 18 are chances. Stage 10 is great, but it is the first stage for real gaps (apart from crashes on cobbles) in the Tour and these have a habit being something of a let down as the contenders feel each other out. Stage 14 is a good chance. Though I'll argue if you want to win the Tour Froome needs to be with max 2 teammates over col du lauteret and the attacks need to be constant from there on, if you wait until izoard, you may make a minute, but not 5. Stage 17 could be the most exciting stage of the tour, but I can't see big time gaps. Stage 18 depends on what has happend up until now, and many folk may be looking more to move from 5th to 4th, which spoils any opportunity presented coupled with Tourmalet being so obvious, and finishing up Hautacam means a Sky don't have to catch the leaders, just get close. I'd say you have almost no chance of taking 1 minute let alone 5.
There are many stages I like for the interest of who wins the stage, but for GC overall this isn't much of a tour. I'd prefer to see the race week 3, then week 1 then week 2 to be honest.
 
Oct 29, 2011
252
0
0
Visit site
karlboss said:
I like cobbles being included, but I always think they should play a part in the race beyond who crashes and who doesn't. Even include 2 cobbled stages of a distance and difficulty that will create gaps even if no one crashes. I think to reduce crashes placing them in the final week would be better. Worth a shot or must we see high mountains and a TT decide things in the final week?
A tour from a GC excitement standpoint for me is determined by how easy to knock off the favourite it is. Which is really hard if the favourite is the best climber and flat TTer. Far easier if you are pitting Schleck vs Evans than Froome vs Quintana. Froome is only vulnerable on the flat once isolated from his team, cobbles are an unknown, downhill I've not seen anything to show he's particularly vulnerable. 5 uphill finishes definitely fall in Froome's favour. Long flat ITT definitely falls in his favour.
IMHO if want to beat Froome, beat Sky in the hills and Froome on the flat. Even queen stages up and down all day can fall into his favour, as with a little patience Froome and Sky may lose the leaders on a climb. Then they can regroup drive hard to the next climb and then Froome can use the climb to bridge the gap, same same with a MTF. IMHO the best stages to beat Sky would be ridiculous hard starts and long flat finishes. These don't exist this tour. With 5 uphill finishes and a long TT I'd say the next best rider needs to find minimum 5 minutes over Froome to win. For surprise sake, best to do it one hit.

Stages 10, 14, 17, and 18 are chances. Stage 10 is great, but it is the first stage for real gaps (apart from crashes on cobbles) in the Tour and these have a habit being something of a let down as the contenders feel each other out. Stage 14 is a good chance. Though I'll argue if you want to win the Tour Froome needs to be with max 2 teammates over col du lauteret and the attacks need to be constant from there on, if you wait until izoard, you may make a minute, but not 5. Stage 17 could be the most exciting stage of the tour, but I can't see big time gaps. Stage 18 depends on what has happend up until now, and many folk may be looking more to move from 5th to 4th, which spoils any opportunity presented coupled with Tourmalet being so obvious, and finishing up Hautacam means a Sky don't have to catch the leaders, just get close. I'd say you have almost no chance of taking 1 minute let alone 5.
There are many stages I like for the interest of who wins the stage, but for GC overall this isn't much of a tour. I'd prefer to see the race week 3, then week 1 then week 2 to be honest.
I think Nibali has chance to get some time from Froome in Stage 2, just like Porto Sant'Elpidio in 2013 Tirreno-Adriatico Stage 6
tour-de-france-2014-stage-2-elevation-profile-full.png


very disappointed that there are 20 km between the bottom of descend to the finish line at Mulhouse in Stage 9, if not, Nibali would have had his chance in that stage too.
TourdeFrance2014Vosgesstage.png


Vosges would be excited if some teams are keen to create chaos in Stage 9 and Stage 10, just like Garmin do in TdF 2013 stage 9. Compared to Stage 14 or Pyrenees stages , I think those stages(stage 2, 8, 9, 10) would favor Nibali more. But if Nibali get time from Froome, he is highly possible to wear yellow jersey too early, which will give him extra pressure
 
Mar 13, 2009
2,890
0
0
Visit site
coimbrawu said:
I think Nibali has chance to get some time from Froome in Stage 2, just like Porto Sant'Elpidio in 2013 Tirreno-Adriatico Stage 6
tour-de-france-2014-stage-2-elevation-profile-full.png


very disappointed that there are 20 km between the bottom of descend to the finish line at Mulhouse in Stage 9, if not, Nibali would have had his chance in that stage too.
TourdeFrance2014Vosgesstage.png


Vosges would be excited if some teams are keen to create chaos in Stage 9 and Stage 10, just like Garmin do in TdF 2013 stage 9

Stage 8, I can't see gaps till the final climb and they will be small, 10 I mentioned. 2 is unlikely it's a classic route but not a classic, with the full might of Sky I'm not sure it offers much. Stage 9 I hadn't seen that, the flat at the end offers an opportunity, decent for the gap flat for time, works well.
 
Oct 29, 2011
252
0
0
Visit site
karlboss said:
Stage 8, I can't see gaps till the final climb and they will be small, 10 I mentioned. 2 is unlikely it's a classic route but not a classic, with the full might of Sky I'm not sure it offers much. Stage 9 I hadn't seen that, the flat at the end offers an opportunity, decent for the gap flat for time, works well.
If this article in the blog is correct, there are some nasty steep climb in the final kms, some section with gradient more that 20%, like Jenkin road, that is like Porto Sant'Elpidio, and it is hard for Sky to control races with many steep sections. For those who wants to beat Froome in the next tour, it is hard to expect to beat him in one stage. Get 10 seconds in one stage, and 30 stage in another stage, etc. is more possible IMO. And at least it is highly possible not to see Froome in yellow after stage 10, or even after the 1st/2nd Pyrenees stage. If so, there will be the big improvement comparing to the last 2 editions;)
 

TRENDING THREADS