Re: Re:
Oh yeah, I meant to write 'as great a descender', not that he's 'not great'. He's pretty good (not Zakarin or Moncoutie), but he's definitely not Valverde or Bardet either.
Gigs_98 said:Didn't yates attack on the aspin descent?Cannibal72 said:Eshnar said:Valverde is the same guy who didn't follow Nibali in Lombardia. Being a good descender doesn't really say much when the most important thing is being tactically aware. Say Yates attacks, Quintana looks at Valverde, Valverde looks at Froome, Froome says "lol why should I risk anything" and in the meantime Bardet is already gone with Yates. All the better for the australian, who only needed to gap Quintana, Bardet can follow.Cannibal72 said:Slightly confused why only Quintana could possibly chase when Valverde, a much better descender than Yates or Quintana, was still in the group, and Bardet was just 35 seconds up on Yates.
Ofc he can also fail, everybody jumps on his wheel at the same time like it never happened in recent history and he achieves nothing. But he f'n TRIED.
Yeah, Valverde is a singularly atrocious tactician, but I don't think it comes down to anyone following Yates, but to the fact that he'll simply be swept up if Valverde decides to lead the chase down - on the descent or, quite possibly, the flat. My attitude is that Yates, who isn't a great descender and had been fighting to stick with the lead group all Tour, was simply spent - physically, mentally, everything. I think he was just trying to cling on.
(Also, Yates is British, not Australian. )
And what happened to eshnar? Aspin, ruta del sol, Australian?
Oh yeah, I meant to write 'as great a descender', not that he's 'not great'. He's pretty good (not Zakarin or Moncoutie), but he's definitely not Valverde or Bardet either.