• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Rate the Ronde van Vlaanderen 2016

How do you rate this Ronde van Vlaanderen

  • 5/7 perfect score

    Votes: 3 3.2%
  • 3

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 4

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 5

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • 6

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • 7

    Votes: 6 6.4%
  • 8

    Votes: 28 29.8%
  • 10

    Votes: 15 16.0%
  • 9

    Votes: 40 42.6%

  • Total voters
    94
  • Poll closed .
It was extremely close to a 9.5, but in the end it was more like an 8. Had the final chase gotten to within 10 seconds of Sagan, as opposed to going backwards, it would've been simply unbelievable.
 
pedromiguelmartins said:
You have to fix the pool.

11910278_1623846804537253_1166857694_n.jpg
 
I gave it a 7. Nice for Sagan to win a monument at last but I don't find gap-watching for 10km more exciting than a group of favourites repeatedly attacking each other, which is what I was hoping for, and perhaps what might have happened without the GVA crash. Maybe I'm being negative though.
 

TRENDING THREADS