• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

READ THIS! (Posting Violations)

Page 4 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Aug 13, 2009
12,855
1
0
Visit site
Slayer said:
Well I am mostly talking about a wider cultural here at the clinic in relation to those that take differing views - those that are not part of the 'in the know' groupset are often treated with contempt - but you can always just ignore this particular poster. The reaction to him has caused more disruption that the poster himself.

I think a certain amount of people probably enjoy that - and yes it must be fun to gang up on him - but it can come across as bullying. A lot of people don't like to read nastiness, so maybe the ignore function is the way to go.

It is not a "Wider Cultural" it is you. You are singled out because of your deliberate attempts to highjack threads and bait posters. If you review the threads that have gotten hostile in the clinic over the last few months there is one common thread, one of your many usernames had been involved in disrupting the discussion. Without this intentional disruption that you cause it is possible for this to be a very civil place.
 

Slayer

BANNED
Dec 29, 2009
108
0
0
Visit site
Race Radio said:
As usual you are attempting to confuse the issue.

I label you, and your multiple banned usernames troll, because that is what you are. I do not use this for everyone that I disagree with, just you. This is largely the case with most posters here. You highjack a thread, bait posters, then claim persecution when multiple posters call you out on your trolling.

You are the target of multiple posters bile because of your deliberate actions, not because they incapable of civil discussion.

Nope, it's like talking to a wall. There is no way on earth RaceRadio is going to address any aspect of his style here. This dogmatic response from him in this thread - not even addressing the fact he, along with many others, has been told off by the Mod OP for being a bit nasty to another poster (that has nothing to do with me, yet he still claims I am claiming persecution) - rather proves my point.

Maybe it's understandable that you wouldn't want to do this here, RR, but as long as you take note of the OP and take account of this in future, and don't pretend you can just go on as before, then that will be good enough. Nobody should duck their role here.
 
Slayer said:
Well I am mostly talking about a wider cultural here at the clinic in relation to those that take differing views - those that are not part of the 'in the know' groupset are often treated with contempt - but you can always just ignore this particular poster. The reaction to him has caused more disruption that the poster himself.

I think a certain amount of people probably enjoy that - and yes it must be fun to gang up on him - but it can come across as bullying. A lot of people don't like to read nastiness, so maybe the ignore function is the way to go.


Why can you just not admit that somebody who is making ridiculous posts and using lies to back them up is just here to disrupt. As I mentioned in my last post, if it was just a case of disagreeing with somebody like I did with Ludwig, there would be not a problem between many people.

Secondly, if Rise of the Dead is not part of the 'In the Know group', if his knowledge is just limited, why does he ignore everything they that is pointed out to him. There was a poster ages ago who came on with a lack of insight into a particular subject. After those 'in the know' answered all his questions and points, he realised what was going on, done some research and then acknowledged that he was unaware beforehand and now had a better understanding of things.

Rise of the Dead has no interest in such a thin because he is not here to gain a wider view on things. Simple.
 

Slayer

BANNED
Dec 29, 2009
108
0
0
Visit site
Race Radio said:
It is not a "Wider Cultural" it is you. You are singled out because of your deliberate attempts to highjack threads and bait posters. If you review the threads that have gotten hostile in the clinic over the last few months there is one common thread, one of your many usernames had been involved in disrupting the discussion. Without this intentional disruption that you cause it is possible for this to be a very civil place.

But we all know about your definition of "disrupting discussion". You're extremely intolerant. This is not your forum and you do not have the right to dictate. It's that mentality that is part of the problem.
 
Slayer said:
But we all know about your definition of "disrupting discussion". You're extremely intolerant. This is not your forum and you do not have the right to dictate. It's that mentality that is part of the problem.

Umm, you realize no one else is complaining about RR, other than it would be nice if he ignored you, but there have been numerous people who have complained about you in your various incarnations. Also, does repeat banning not actually demonstrate that you are not learning, and are in fact just trolling.

Put me down as OK with IP banning :mad:
 

Slayer

BANNED
Dec 29, 2009
108
0
0
Visit site
pmcg76 said:
Why can you just not admit that somebody who is making ridiculous posts and using lies to back them up is just here to disrupt.

Well, as I keep saying, I think he is simplistic and repetative, and clearly he needs to be warned about that. But there is an element of truth in what he says, from my point of view, so I don't think he is lying as such. He's just a bit cackhanded.

I don't go along with these conspiracy theories about people coming here to "disrupt the threads", even if their actions are causing a disruption. That's often used about anyone who stands up for themselves that doesn't buy into the whole clinic religion, so to me it's a slippery slope - an easy tactic to get the mods to silence people. First its him, but who is next?

I would advise our friend to try to straighten the edges of his approach so as not to provoke people, stop repeating the same point in nearly every post, and take a little break so people can have a rest of him. And others should just ignore him.

The thing is, though they won't admit it, there are some who quite like having someone around making ignorant points about EPO so they have a punch bag to play with. That's why he gets so many responses.
 

Slayer

BANNED
Dec 29, 2009
108
0
0
Visit site
Ripper said:
Umm, you realize no one else is complaining about RR,

I think Michael's post may have summed up the silent majority. There have been posters that have talked about the "a***hole gang" that often developes here.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,855
1
0
Visit site
Slayer said:
Nope, it's like talking to a wall. There is no way on earth RaceRadio is going to address any aspect of his style here. This dogmatic response from him in this thread - not even addressing the fact he, along with many others, has been told off by the Mod OP for being a bit nasty to another poster (that has nothing to do with me, yet he still claims I am claiming persecution) - rather proves my point.

Maybe it's understandable that you wouldn't want to do this here, RR, but as long as you take note of the OP and take account of this in future, and don't pretend you can just go on as before, then that will be good enough. Nobody should duck their role here.

Once again you lie, I have not been told off by any of the Mods. In fact they all agree that you are a troll who is bringing down the forum. That should make you happy as that is your goal.
 

Slayer

BANNED
Dec 29, 2009
108
0
0
Visit site
Race Radio said:
Once again you lie, I have not been told off by any of the Mods. In fact they all agree that you are a troll who is bringing down the forum. That should make you happy as that is your goal.

Alpe d'Huez was addressing the hoohah that has surrounded Rise of the Dead - both him and the reaction to him - in recent days. Given that you were apart of that, you must be one of the people he is addressing. Just take note of it. Your bickering spoils threads.
 
Slayer said:
Well, as I keep saying, I think he is simplistic and repetative, and clearly he needs to be warned about that. But there is an element of truth in what he says, from my point of view, so I don't think he is lying as such. He's just a bit cackhanded.

I don't go along with these conspiracy theories about people coming here to "disrupt the threads", even if their actions are causing a disruption. That's often used about anyone who stands up for themselves that doesn't buy into the whole clinic religion, so to me it's a slippery slope - an easy tactic to get the mods to silence people. First its him, but who is next?

I would advise our friend to try to straighten the edges of his approach so as not to provoke people, stop repeating the same point in nearly every post, and take a little break so people can have a rest of him. And others should just ignore him.

The thing is, though they won't admit it, there are some who quite like having someone around making ignorant points about EPO so they have a punch bag to play with. That's why he gets so many responses.

Not lying, he made up a story about a post Tour press conference that never happened.

He took haematocrit figures of 2 riders from 95 & 02 respectively and said they were both from 97.

He says that the UCI 50% limit had no effect on Bjarne Riis perfromance when he was once recorded with a level of 56% and was known as Mr.60%.

David Millar dednt improve on EPO when Millar himself said he improved with EPO and his results reflect that.

These are all lies yet he sticks to these lies. If you have been proven to be wrong, just admit it and move on, otherwise you are just trolling. What part of these lies do you believe to be true.
 
Slayer said:
I think Michael's post may have summed up the silent majority. There have been posters that have talked about the "a***hole gang" that often developes here.

No, the silent majority wonders why you are still allowed to post here despite being banned time and time again.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
"What the hell happened to this place?

I walk away for a half-day and the place has turned into a food fight. My inbox fills with complaints, even direct e-mails, and threads fill with post after post of bickering, antagonizing, nonsense":

Boy, I bet Alpe is pretty happy at starting this thread! (Being ironic here of course....) He had good intentions anyhow...
 

Slayer

BANNED
Dec 29, 2009
108
0
0
Visit site
pmcg76 said:
Not lying, he made up a story about a post Tour press conference that never happened.

Someone may have got their facts muddled - they're not necessarily lying.

David Millar dednt improve on EPO when Millar himself said he improved with EPO and his results reflect that.

The more subtle point is he didn't improve by an astonishing amount. He's done fairly well since he's been clean. That's what you should take away from that.
 

Slayer

BANNED
Dec 29, 2009
108
0
0
Visit site
Cash05458 said:
"What the hell happened to this place?

I walk away for a half-day and the place has turned into a food fight. My inbox fills with complaints, even direct e-mails, and threads fill with post after post of bickering, antagonizing, nonsense":

Boy, I bet Alpe is pretty happy at starting this thread! (Being ironic here of course....) He had good intentions anyhow...

Yeah, the idea was good. What we need now is a little bit of courage to back it up.
 
Slayer said:
Someone may have got their facts muddled - they're not necessarily lying.



The more subtle point is he didn't improve by an astonishing amount. He's done fairly well since he's been clean. That's what you should take away from that.

Muddling facts, you cannot muddle facts like that to make a point, its called lying. Fact.

Millar didnt improve!! no he just became World Champion in the TT, won 2 road stages at the Vuelta and beat at peak Lance in a final Tour TT and finished 2nd in the Dauphine Libere. He has never performed nowhere near that level before or after his EPO usage. Fact.

So you are saying its ok to distort the truth to follow an agenda and thats not trolling!!!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Slayer said:
Yeah, the idea was good. What we need now is a little bit of courage to back it up.

ummmm...Slayer, no offence, but my point is not your point...I believe he was talking about endless bickering.
 
Sep 9, 2009
532
0
0
Visit site
pmcg76 said:
Muddling facts, you cannot muddle facts like that to make a point, its called lying. Fact.

Millar didnt improve!! no he just became World Champion in the TT, won 2 road stages at the Vuelta and beat at peak Lance in a final Tour TT and finished 2nd in the Dauphine Libere. He has never performed nowhere near that level before or after his EPO usage. Fact.

So you are saying its ok to distort the truth to follow an agenda and thats not trolling!!!

pmcg, just drop it. Ignore the dumb mother****er; it's not worth your time or intellect.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
I arrived here about a month ago after avoiding forums for a year. I suffer from depression related to a car crash and unemployment, so I try to avoid negativity. So far I have forty people, or at least names, on my ignore list. The problem is that when I check back on a forum thread, there are quotes from people I'm trying to ignore all over the place. That's why I'll start a thread on a topic I feel is important but only pop back in with fresh quotes or links. I miss out on a lot of other people's opinions because the ignore list doesn't work when others repeat the negative stuff so they can respond. Cheers
 
theswordsman said:
I arrived here about a month ago after avoiding forums for a year. I suffer from depression related to a car crash and unemployment, so I try to avoid negativity. So far I have forty people, or at least names, on my ignore list. The problem is that when I check back on a forum thread, there are quotes from people I'm trying to ignore all over the place. That's why I'll start a thread on a topic I feel is important but only pop back in with fresh quotes or links. I miss out on a lot of other people's opinions because the ignore list doesn't work when others repeat the negative stuff so they can respond. Cheers

My friend, you are a good poster, I think most of us consider a good poster as someone who can be realsitic and discuss items without resorting to insults. The Clinic can be a negative place, even for me at times but I have followed cycling for 20 years. The first 10 were all sweetness and light but Festina and the last 10 years have changed everything.

Thats why so many are nostalgic for the 80s and 90s even though we know these years were also corrupt was corrupt. Pro Cycling is like The Matrix, all normal and bright, full of heros and great drama but once you swallow the Festina pill, you enter a completely different world, a nastier, seedier, darker world. We are like the guy in the movie who wanted to be re-inserted into The Matrix- He said 'Ignorance is Bliss'
 
Jun 21, 2009
847
0
0
Visit site
pmcg76 said:
I know but I am not working this week and I am in an argiung mood and the more they post their rubbish, the more it will become obvious to the mods what they are really about and hopefully....

i guess you've realised that rise and slayer is one and the same person? which is also is the same person as max power, deadlift, banprocycling, unbanprocycling, britishprocycling etc.

and i'm with the posters early on who said that these problems aren't down to normal posters on here, it is down to this madman who creates login upon login and THE MODS/ADMINS on here who quite simply do not do their job, report after report has been sent to make them aware of the bleeding obvious that the banned troll is back.

why does it take them three weeks to ban him each time? seriously, it makes me wonder. Don't tell me it's to do with free speech - he's already been banned so that can't possibly be the explanation.

at this rate we'll lose people like dr. maserati, pmcg76, theswordsman, race radio etc. Who thinks the lads from the science of sport can be bothered to come on here with their views any more? or betsy a. or vaughters. or any other people which are interesting to hear from.

if an ip ban of the whole of the uk is what is needed, i'm all for it (if that is where he actually is based that is).
 

Slayer

BANNED
Dec 29, 2009
108
0
0
Visit site
workingclasshero said:
i guess you've realised that rise and slayer is one and the same person? which is also is the same person as max power, deadlift, banprocycling, unbanprocycling, britishprocycling etc..

epic_fail.jpg
 
Jun 29, 2009
111
0
0
Visit site
workingclasshero said:
i guess you've realised that rise and slayer is one and the same person? which is also is the same person as max power, deadlift, banprocycling, unbanprocycling, britishprocycling etc.

and i'm with the posters early on who said that these problems aren't down to normal posters on here, it is down to this madman who creates login upon login and THE MODS/ADMINS on here who quite simply do not do their job, report after report has been sent to make them aware of the bleeding obvious that the banned troll is back.

why does it take them three weeks to ban him each time? seriously, it makes me wonder. Don't tell me it's to do with free speech - he's already been banned so that can't possibly be the explanation.

at this rate we'll lose people like dr. maserati, pmcg76, theswordsman, race radio etc. Who thinks the lads from the science of sport can be bothered to come on here with their views any more? or betsy a. or vaughters. or any other people which are interesting to hear from.

if an ip ban of the whole of the uk is what is needed, i'm all for it (if that is where he actually is based that is).
Ouch, a little harsh there. We're not all demented trolls over here you know lol.

Gotta say I was a bit embarrassed when Alpe said this nutcase was from the south east of England, precisely my location. However apparently he's with the largest ISP, which my guess puts him with BT, which hopefully means I will be safe if they go ahead with an ip ban. I don't want this freak taking me and others down with him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.