How, pray tell, is is possible to increase VO2max without "recruiting" more muscles into the activity?CoachFergie said:They say increased muscle recruitment not utilising different muscles.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
How, pray tell, is is possible to increase VO2max without "recruiting" more muscles into the activity?CoachFergie said:They say increased muscle recruitment not utilising different muscles.
FrankDay said:How, pray tell, is is possible to increase VO2max without "recruiting" more muscles into the activity?
blutto said:...apart from the lack of a control group, what procedural issues does the Dixon study have that would make it invalid...
You could communicate with the authors.acoggan said:How can that question be answered, since the study was never published?
Huh? If one is at VO2 max the local environment is deteriorating so rapidly, interfering with muscle function, that adding new "fresh" muscle is unlikely to increase oxygen uptake in the short term that could be measured.acoggan said:VO2max is not limited by muscle recruitment. This is demonstrated, e.g., by the fact that if someone who is running uphill on a treadmill at VO2max begins to also exercise with their arms, their VO2 does not increase further.
If you ever go to a scientific meeting I suggest you simply ignore the poster presentations. They must all be worthless because not a single one is going to be published.CoachFergie said:Defeats the purpose of science; to get the information out there. If the authors had done a better job in the first place it would have been published. Having discussions with potential supervisors for my Master's thesis they only appear interested in work that will lead to publication.
FrankDay said:If you ever go to a scientific meeting I suggest you simply ignore the poster presentations. They must all be worthless because not a single one is going to be published.
CoachFergie said:Defeats the purpose of science; to get the information out there. If the authors had done a better job in the first place it would have been published. Having discussions with potential supervisors for my Master's thesis they only appear interested in work that will lead to publication.
acoggan said:How can that question be answered, since the study was never published?
blutto said:...what self-serving poppy-k0ck...where do you pull this stuff out of....errr, never mind ,I think I know...
...and before I go, a few questions...first, are your eyes brown...and two, do you occasionally get a brown line on your forehead...inquiring minds need to know...
Cheers
blutto
Boeing said:i hope you spend as much time telling your so called students that you are a coach as much as you do telling us you are
new nickname CoachPunter
What on earth did post #35 of this thread have to do with this thread. If anyone rambles off topic and shoots messengers it would be …180mmCrank said:I am not going to delete this although I probably should. This is a classic example of straying from comments about the topic to commenting on the person posting the comments.
As frustrating as it can be having someone not see your point of view the rules of the game (this forum) are that you CAN object to the mesage but be careful not to shoot the messenger. AND I know it is not always easy to do one without the other.
Make sense? Please (any of you) drop me a note if you want more clarification (or even just let off steam!)
Terry
Admin
CoachFergie said:I see in Marathon that women can only set a World Record in woman only competition. In Kona do the women start separate from the men or do they all start together? Would definitely affect the result. We have a local road race series where the women start with the men and some of the men if they know they can't foot it at the front of the race drop back and support their female team mates.
Fortunate in cycling we have valid and reliable performance measures when so many confounding variables can affect the result. Better days for competition (like Kona was this year on the bike), different course, different weather, different competition etc.
If you actually knew anything about the race you wouldn't have bothered to waste the bandwidth with that question. The race, of course, has a history and that issue was dealt with several years ago. You, of course, know what you know. Perhaps you should refrain from posting about stuff you don't (which seems to be plenty).CoachFergie said:Happy to fill in the gaps for you Frank...
When preparing a rider for any event one needs to know the demands. Part of that will the competition. In Kona does an Elite Woman race by herself like the men do or do they have the men or age groupers in close proximity. This will affect the nature of racing. In Marathon they no longer award a World Record for times set in mixed start events.
Based on measurement of female riders in both mixed and woman's only races there is a different power profile so we need to take into account different demands when preparing riders for each.
FrankDay said:If you actually knew anything about the race you wouldn't have bothered to waste the bandwidth with that question. The race, of course, has a history and that issue was dealt with several years ago. You, of course, know what you know. Perhaps you should refrain from posting about stuff you don't (which seems to be plenty).
Boeing said:i hope you spend as much time telling your so called students that you are a coach as much as you do telling us you are
new nickname CoachPunter
See note below from Admin...
Like some who post about the demands in crits and track racing perhaps?FrankDay said:If you actually knew anything about the race you wouldn't have bothered to waste the bandwidth with that question. The race, of course, has a history and that issue was dealt with several years ago. You, of course, know what you know. Perhaps you should refrain from posting about stuff you don't (which seems to be plenty).
Alex Simmons/RST said:Like some who post about the demands in crits and track racing perhaps?
Fergie, a few years back they changed the start for the pros to 15 then 30 minutes ahead of the age groupers. This was because the better women swimmers thought it was "unfair" that the slower women pros in the swim could get a draft off of the fast age-group men on the bike. Plus some of the women were getting beat to a pulp by some of the more aggressive age-group men trying to get the glory of being first out of the water.CoachFergie said:The whole point of asking the question was missed in the first place. Comes back to the difference between results and performances. In Kona results in the women's and age group sections results can be affected by other competitors on the course. Same as the Marathon. Hence the Woman's WR in Marathon can only be set in Woman's only racing.
How does one prepare for an event if you don't understand the demands of the event?
FrankDay said:So, a WR is what they say it is, not what you think it should be.