Re:
WOW! You have to wonder what that guy was thinking...or not thinking.FilipeFD said:
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
WOW! You have to wonder what that guy was thinking...or not thinking.FilipeFD said:
jmdirt said:WOW! You have to wonder what that guy was thinking...or not thinking.FilipeFD said:
Jancouver said:
I don't like to start a big discussion after such an accident, but I have a feeling not much is happening to prevent it in the future.
Imagine Formula 1 with 10 safety cars driving around the Formula 1 cars all the time and anyone with a driver license can apply for the job.
That's pretty much the situation in cycling right now...
Ok, that's the exaggerated, emotional version, but you get the point don't you? Let's try to be objective:
80% of all the motorbikes we need in the peloton to prevent accidents and the 20% we need for race footage (no footage>no money).
And most of the time I'm very happy that they are there. And most of them have a lot of experience and are very good in the bunch.
But some are not and some are even more aggressive and full of adrenaline than us riders.
We need to have motorbikes in the peloton that are the opposite of us riders: calm, patient and reasonable. Let us do the racing.
Motorcyclists: we need you for our safety. We don't need you to do your own little race before a corner, trying to overtake the bunch.
So the solution? Better rules when to overtake and when not to. More experience required. Some motorcyclists need a different mentality.
Totally agree with Tom on that. It sounds reasonableice&fire said:Boonen disagrees with this thread title. Interestingly, his explanation makes sense.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/boonen-argues-that-more-vehicles-would-make-peloton-safer/
RedheadDane said:Yeah... why not have more race vehicles connected to the race, but they wouldn't all be in the race at the same time?
ice&fire said:Boonen disagrees with this thread title. Interestingly, his explanation makes sense.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/boonen-argues-that-more-vehicles-would-make-peloton-safer/
PremierAndrew said:(But there should have been a heli to catch the footage)
If the numbers would have been reduced, he might not have even been in the race to cause the crash/injuries.Arredondo said:It's absolutely horrible and disguisting what happened, but it's not evidence to reduce the number of cars and/or motos.
This was just an example of a motard who is totally unfit to serve as a motard. It was an individual mistake, not a consequence of a bigger problem imo.
Lequack said:They're going to be using electric motorbikes at tour of California that starts today. Still not the solution but they're supposed to be much less bulky.
Source:
http://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/racing/tour-california-use-electric-motos-stage-six-time-trial-326221
benzwire said:Lequack said:They're going to be using electric motorbikes at tour of California that starts today. Still not the solution but they're supposed to be much less bulky.
Source:
http://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/racing/tour-california-use-electric-motos-stage-six-time-trial-326221
I was at the first 2 stages of the Women's Tour of California and the motorbikes seemed exactly the same. They look and sound the same, so I don't know if that will change with the men's race, but they certainly aren't any smaller. Most had 2 guys on them. Still going to be a major problem if they collide with a bicycle.