Alex Simmons/RST said:
+1
I work with some riders at this stage outside of the "system", and there is a need for at least some form of good pastoral care*
* not in the religious context, but as often understood in an Aussie/UK context.
That’s right. I work in a school where we are producing some outstanding cyclists, but the pressure they get to throw in school in unbelievable. We are one of the top performing academic schools in Australia and 100% of our kids will go onto university. One of our best cyclists is just starting his VCE and is likely to be in the top one % in the state at year 12. He will most likely become a doctor and he has morons telling him that if he wants to succeed in cycling he needs to think about training full time.
The result of this is that the current system loses some of the best prospects from both a talent and personality point of view because there is no place for them in the current system.
It is also ironic that our town has produced a whole raft of national level juniors, because one guy with a bit of passion but no background in elite cycling got track cycling stated for junior school kids as safe and exciting sport option riding cobbled together bikes. (cheers Roger).
That program has led to over half a dozen state and national titles for juniors, but the transition into the old school development squads does not work for a lot of these kids who want to balance their studies with their riding and maybe even take a year off during their year 12.
Cycling Australia employing someone who focussed on person development rather than just talent identification, would be a good start to developing a meaningful pastoral care program.