VeloCity said:
I don't think that's true - I believe that there are a lot of clean riders, even to the point where we'd be surprised to learn that there really are that many. But it's impossible for us to "know" who's doping and who's not. And that goes for the Moncoutie's and Fedrigo's as much as it does the Gilbert's and Cancellara's.
We don't "know". But we can make educated guesses, and we can believe. I believe in Moncoutié and Fedrigo, and I know that most fans do. I don't "know" that they're clean, but there is nothing about them as personalities, riders, results-getters that flags anything up.
The only thing is the team association thing, and we've been through that many a time. I've been shouted at for pointing out Cadel Evans' dodgy team history, but ultimately we make a judgement call based on rider character, rider results, rider behaviour and personal bias. Hence Cadel Evans rides on several dubious teams but is considered by many to be clean (splits audiences), while Ángel Vicioso rides on several dubious teams but is considered by most to be dirty. Our own biases and what we WANT to believe affects things. I want to believe Mikel Astarloza's protestations of innocence. Hell, I wanted to believe Valverde's but simply couldn't. There's always the argument that "He couldn't do it, he's one of the nice guys". Well, people on this forum have met and liked Tyler Hamilton. I've met and liked Patrik Sinkewitz. I wanted to believe Sinky was coming back clean because he had had such a difficult time of making a comeback and looked so happy to have got a ride back. But when he tested positive in February, it wasn't a big shock.
I want to believe in Moncoutié and Fedrigo, sure, but I don't have any reason to believe that my faith would be misplaced. If one of them tested positive, it really WOULD be a big shock. And there aren't many riders around today for whom I can say that.