The Hitch said:Im surprised he doesn't speak english yet though.
he spoke basic english already in his unibet days. but he doesn't want to learn it I think. similar with most colombians.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
The Hitch said:Im surprised he doesn't speak english yet though.
Afrank said:"we are not like Froome"
Translation
"we will not wait for Wiggins"
I hope Froome & his other half interpret his words right
keithmcmahon said:Great stuff from Uran, loyalty only ups his value in the market place.
I would not be surprised if Sky get out their checkbooks and keep the Colombians and drop others.
keithmcmahon said:Great stuff from Uran, loyalty only ups his value in the market place.
I would not be surprised if Sky get out their checkbooks and keep the Colombians and drop others.
Ryo Hazuki said:he spoke basic english already in his unibet days. but he doesn't want to learn it I think. similar with most colombians.
jamesmasters said:What do you mean? Look at what he said:
“I don’t know what will happen, but [Sergio] Henao and I are different than Froome. We always work for the team and we’ve never had any problems with the team”
"Sergio and I are different than Froome, we always work for the team" can only possibly mean one thing - "We are team players and Froome isn't." It is not a compliment to Froome. There was no need to mention Froome at all - he could have just said he had no issues with Wiggins, full stop.
Anyway, like I said, he seems a very nice and professional guy (more so than either Froome or Wiggins) and I hope he gets his chance here, although it is difficult to see him taking 2 mins from Nibali.
The Hitch said:Was this the first gt stage by the esabarjos emergentes? The only Colombian i remember winning a stage in recent years is Rubiano
Agree with this. Uran is being a bit unfair on froome. Very unfair on froome in fact. Froome not wiggins was the one who lost out in the tour, to paint wiggins as the victim is ridiculous.
Afrank said:"we are not like Froome"
Translation
"we will not wait for Wiggins"
Afrank said:"we are not like Froome"
Translation
"we will not wait for Wiggins"
hrotha said:This might not be a ridiculously and hilariously public conflict like Wiggins vs Froome, but not all is peachy.
jamesmasters said:What do you mean? Look at what he said:
“I don’t know what will happen, but [Sergio] Henao and I are different than Froome. We always work for the team and we’ve never had any problems with the team”
"Sergio and I are different than Froome, we always work for the team" can only possibly mean one thing - "We are team players and Froome isn't." It is not a compliment to Froome. There was no need to mention Froome at all - he could have just said he had no issues with Wiggins, full stop.
Anyway, like I said, he seems a very nice and professional guy (more so than either Froome or Wiggins) and I hope he gets his chance here, although it is difficult to see him taking 2 mins from Nibali.
The Hitch said:Agree with this. Uran is being a bit unfair on froome. Very unfair on froome in fact. Froome not wiggins was the one who lost out in the tour, to paint wiggins as the victim is ridiculous.
Jelantik said:wow the only thing that's interesting about Uran's comment, the saga between froome and wiggins does get to the other sky's riders. Some is probably pro Froome and some is probably pro Wiggins *I don't mean in physically make an ally, but in their mind, how each of them interpret the saga between Froome and Wiggins.*
It's definitely not unity as the sky management's claim.
Froome only needs Vasil Kiryienka. Wiggins can keep the rest of the team at the tour!maxmartin said:It will be funny in the Tour, Froom has two men train, Wiggins has another two men train, riding parallel to each other. Wouldn't that be something!
Jelantik said:Here's another thought.
Hypothetically, if Uran wins the Giro or at least podium, and he'll decide to stay with Sky, I can guarantee that his attitude will change just like Froome. What does that mean? He wants leadership too for next year Giro . Guess what? Now, the battle of leadership will be between Richie and Uran. Uran probably feels that he has proven his GT pedigre (if he won or podium in this year Giro). While richie hasn't had any GT yet (it would be a strectch if he can leapfrog Froome in TDF). De ja vu anyone? Exactly. Sky will have so many drama in hand.
but again.. this is just a conspiracy theory
Ryo Hazuki said:uran and henao stand on their own. btw read this:
"I'll have to speak to Rigoberto tonight. He went all out for the stage. It's just whether he feels now he can go for that GC. There's a time trial. He's quite inconsistent like that; he can have a really good day, win a stage like today and then lose a few seconds tomorrow, so we'll have to see how he feels."
pathetic is not even the word to describe what wiggins says here about uran.
jamesmasters said:As for Rigoberto having to wait - in fact, I don't think this has actually made much difference at all. If he had been closer in the GC, Nibali would not have let him go. So it has evened itself out.
Unfortunately the most likely scenario is that Urán, being a lot closer in the GC and riding for Sky, would have saved himself instead of attacking with 8 km to goRyo Hazuki said:agnoli would not have rode 50 seconds faster if uran was closer to gc, so no. and nibali or no one counters an attack with 8 km to go on a mountain. that is modern cycling
hrotha said:Unfortunately the most likely scenario is that Urán, being a lot closer in the GC and riding for Sky, would have saved himself instead of attacking with 8 km to go