The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
BroDeal said:I would get a hardtail if it was the year 2000. It is not so I would not.
hiero2 said:Based on what Bro sez here, I would say his opinion is based on style, appearance, and opinion only. Therefore - do what works best for you - and don't worry about silly opinions about style. [Anything year based is likely styling. Sure, some tech advancements interim, but no worries, old tech is not automatically bad - just different.]
BroDeal said:Some tech advancements? Telling someone who wants to get into MTBing to get a hardtail is like telling someone to buy a model T to commute to work. You might as well recommend V brakes instead of discs. The hardtail ship sailed, was hit by an iceberg, and sank at sea years ago. Unless you are a granola type with skillz--you know, the same types who probably also owns a single speed, which may be fully rigid--then you want full suspension. This is especially true if local trails are littered with these hard, lumpy things that are sometimes referred to as rocks. Don't be the sorry bastrd with a hardtail that tries to ride with friends who all have dual boingers.