Mr.DNA said:Please tell us which other crimes should be ignored in the interest of saving taxpayer money.
I wasn't aware all crimes went to congressional hearing.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Mr.DNA said:Please tell us which other crimes should be ignored in the interest of saving taxpayer money.
TeamSkyFans said:completely off topic but just noticed you are from aachen. Weve were there on holiday two weeks ago
redtreviso said:Good....Rafael Palmeiro should be next
Mr.DNA said:Please tell us which other crimes should be ignored in the interest of saving taxpayer money.
eleven said:Well you certainly can't allow perjury to go unchallenged but Clemens should have never been hauled in front of congress in the first place. It was just a congressional ****show.
And of course, as a visitor you don't have to pay for this crap
eleven said:I suspect Clemens and Bonds are actually worth more than Armstrong, but that's neither here nor there. All 3 can afford damn good representation .... though it doesn't appear the first two go damn good advice.
There's also an important distinction here: Bonds and Clemens are being indicted for perjury. I suspect the good representation hired by Armstrong will dissuade him from perjuring himself at all costs. As we now know, perjury is Novitsky's bread and butter (and rightfully so).
stephens said:He could avoid all that by not saying a word. There would be no cross examination. He can just keep hammering the "witch hunt" thing in the press and his attorneys can cross examine all the witnesses and all the evidence the prosecution enters.
stephens said:That these cases only end up with perjury charges is just ridiculous. "Sir, what you've actually done is not serious enough to warrant any sort of punishment whatsoever, but the fact that you lied about this not-very-serious thing is serious and therefore you are going to jail." Huh? I mean, come on. Either the act is a big enough deal on it's own, or it's not.
None of these guys should have ever answered a single question. I suspect that's the strategy Lance and all other future "suspects" will take. Nothing good can come of it, and certainly an individual shouldn't be under any obligation to assist the authorities in "proving" he has done something they don't fancy.
Cobblestoned said:Not yet really, but I am thinking about some Botox or a beauty operation for my laugh lines.
I think an Armstrong-clinic subforum would be great, with all posts and threads referring Armstrongdoping/fraud moved to that.
Just to be satisfactory to the other clinic´s inmates. They are suffering and disadvantaged because of Lord Lance.
This thread is the best example that it just takes a few posts till........ I have to and congratulate.
frizzlefry said:Clemens volunteered to testify. He was not under subpeona.
Cobblestoned said:Another Lance Armstrong thread.
Great !
Lajeretta4Ever said:Ahh, now I know what Flandis meant in his infamous "Big Tex is going down" text. It was always about Clemens.