taiwan said:Wonder how this relates to him losing time in the third week.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TphEh0Qgv0
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
taiwan said:Wonder how this relates to him losing time in the third week.
Telmisartan new said:Oh well,if Cookson wins its business as usual then.
Tygart shouldn't have called Postal the most sophisticated team doping program ever,its yet to be unmasked as we all know.
taiwan said:Wonder how this relates to him losing time in the third week.
Trudgin said:Makes sense that after Di Luca was caught 2nd rest day that he'd probably ease up...
I've always favoured the theory that the Giro organizers told them to tone it down so as to not turn the race into a complete farce. They had their stage win, but they shouldn't go for the podium.Bannockburn said:Or that the numerous tests in the first week spooked him. Or that since he tested positive after stage one the benefit of whatever he was using prior to the race started to tank. Or some combination of all of the above.
hrotha said:I've always favoured the theory that the Giro organizers told them to tone it down so as to not turn the race into a complete farce. They had their stage win, but they shouldn't go for the podium.
thehog said:Well they are getting away with daylight robbery.
Can't blame the other teams trying to keep up.
Di Luca was caught during the non-conventional rest day of stage 19. Santambrogio had already cracked on stage 16.Trudgin said:Makes sense that after Di Luca was caught 2nd rest day that he'd probably ease up...
Trudgin said:Somewhere in the clinic, someone is calling out every rider in the peloton when they have a good day... So it's not really worth mentioning that it was said in the clinic..
Christ, there's has been doubt placed over everyone by the Clinic... I'm guilty as well, just a bit selective
taiwan said:Wonder how this relates to him losing time in the third week.
argyllflyer said:Average late mid career rider dopes and stands out enough to win / challenge on mountain stages and draw suspicion on himself.
Does this mean everyone else - people who have podiumed in grand tours and / or won them, and are likely much more talented - is actually doping far more than Santambrogio, in such a way that cannot be detected by the blood passport so that only dodgy Italians (but not Nibali) microdosing EPO get caught?
A rhetorical question for the Clinic I suppose.
You are right. the ease up because of Di Luca's positive does not apply. But the increase in tests in the first two weeks could have been an alarm on him, thinking out loud. Then the ease up came and the results showed during the third week. Or maybe he was warned. Who knows.Eshnar said:Di Luca was caught during the non-conventional rest day of stage 19. Santambrogio had already cracked on stage 16.
IzzyStradlin said:
For the sake of comparison...
Trudgin said:Somewhere in the clinic, someone is calling out every rider in the peloton when they have a good day... So it's not really worth mentioning that it was said in the clinic..
Christ, there's has been doubt placed over everyone by the Clinic... I'm guilty as well, just a bit selective
Moose McKnuckles said:The Clinic called this one a month ago.
Dude, i like you but please don't steal my thunderElChingon said:Well this proves that not only EPO works and that no matter how many tests are devised against it or to identify it, its benefits outweigh the risks of getting caught. Those riders still using it know they can get away with it and are, the testing if its still going on is still the same random testing and I'm sure there are still riders who can find out if they're on the random test list and plan accordingly, its not like that secret test scenario has changed. The supposed old unused PED EPO was put on the dopers shelves as a momento but as we see it has not been put up on the shelves and is still helping some get a contract and earn a living way past the official post 2006 there is no doping in cycling time line. The changes are proving to be in pro cycling marketing not the reality of what is going on or still going on. Is it dumb to use EPO? Well if you add up the salary earned with it and the statistics of getting caught and if caught its totally worth it.
All the riders who are now coming out saying they knew or had a hint of what was going on with these two recent EPO positives, well everyone on the planet knew/knows. Much like the reasoned decision, these guys will not say one F-ing thing because their own skins are backed by these EPO fueled riders, but after the fact they come out like Nostradamus, and of course stating they are clean! Wait didn't we hear that before? Yet it repeats.
Nothing has changed and nothing will, those who preach change are just basically living out on some alternative reality from Pro Cycling.
In closing, I should know, "I'm involved with Pro Cycling", AB 3:16.
Just the ones starting from a low baseline.thehog said:Yes it shows that the new era of clean cycling you can beat dopers.
thehog said:When Di Luca went down obviously Santa laid off his last two micro-doses and he went back to being his normal self.